Medical abortions provided via telemedicine appear safe

Medical abortions using mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate a pregnancy up to 10 weeks of gestation were associated with similar rates of clinically significant adverse events whether the patient encounters occurred via telemedicine or in-office appointments, according to a retrospective cohort study published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Among the 8,765 medical abortions associated with telemedicine visits and the 10,405 associated with in-person visits at Planned Parenthood of the Heartland clinics in Iowa during the 7-year study period, a total of 49 clinically significant adverse events (hospital admission, blood transfusion, treatment given in an emergency department) were reported. There were no surgeries or deaths in the cohort. Of telemedicine patients, 0.18% had any clinically adverse event (95% confidence interval, 0.11%-0.29%), compared with 0.32% of in-person patients (95% CI, 0.23%-0.45%), wrote Daniel Grossman, MD, of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, and Kate Grindlay, MSPH, of IBIS Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Mass.

“In the 2 years after telemedicine was introduced at [these] clinics, women had an almost 50% higher adjusted odds of obtaining a first trimester abortion instead of a second-trimester abortion, [which] is associated with a higher risk of complications,” Dr. Grossman and Dr. Grindlay wrote. “Rather than increasing risks of abortion, it may be that telemedicine provision of medical abortion helps to reduce such risks by improving access to early abortion.”

Dr. Grossman has served as a consultant to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, providing input on the implementation of telemedicine services. Dr. Grindlay reported no financial disclosures.

Medical abortions using mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate a pregnancy up to 10 weeks of gestation were associated with similar rates of clinically significant adverse events whether the patient encounters occurred via telemedicine or in-office appointments, according to a retrospective cohort study published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Among the 8,765 medical abortions associated with telemedicine visits and the 10,405 associated with in-person visits at Planned Parenthood of the Heartland clinics in Iowa during the 7-year study period, a total of 49 clinically significant adverse events (hospital admission, blood transfusion, treatment given in an emergency department) were reported. There were no surgeries or deaths in the cohort. Of telemedicine patients, 0.18% had any clinically adverse event (95% confidence interval, 0.11%-0.29%), compared with 0.32% of in-person patients (95% CI, 0.23%-0.45%), wrote Daniel Grossman, MD, of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, and Kate Grindlay, MSPH, of IBIS Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Mass.

“In the 2 years after telemedicine was introduced at [these] clinics, women had an almost 50% higher adjusted odds of obtaining a first trimester abortion instead of a second-trimester abortion, [which] is associated with a higher risk of complications,” Dr. Grossman and Dr. Grindlay wrote. “Rather than increasing risks of abortion, it may be that telemedicine provision of medical abortion helps to reduce such risks by improving access to early abortion.”

Dr. Grossman has served as a consultant to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, providing input on the implementation of telemedicine services. Dr. Grindlay reported no financial disclosures.

Medical abortions using mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate a pregnancy up to 10 weeks of gestation were associated with similar rates of clinically significant adverse events whether the patient encounters occurred via telemedicine or in-office appointments, according to a retrospective cohort study published online in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Among the 8,765 medical abortions associated with telemedicine visits and the 10,405 associated with in-person visits at Planned Parenthood of the Heartland clinics in Iowa during the 7-year study period, a total of 49 clinically significant adverse events (hospital admission, blood transfusion, treatment given in an emergency department) were reported. There were no surgeries or deaths in the cohort. Of telemedicine patients, 0.18% had any clinically adverse event (95% confidence interval, 0.11%-0.29%), compared with 0.32% of in-person patients (95% CI, 0.23%-0.45%), wrote Daniel Grossman, MD, of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, and Kate Grindlay, MSPH, of IBIS Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Mass.

“In the 2 years after telemedicine was introduced at [these] clinics, women had an almost 50% higher adjusted odds of obtaining a first trimester abortion instead of a second-trimester abortion, [which] is associated with a higher risk of complications,” Dr. Grossman and Dr. Grindlay wrote. “Rather than increasing risks of abortion, it may be that telemedicine provision of medical abortion helps to reduce such risks by improving access to early abortion.”

Dr. Grossman has served as a consultant to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, providing input on the implementation of telemedicine services. Dr. Grindlay reported no financial disclosures.