User login
Credit: Piotr Bodzek
HOUSTON—A family of hemostatic products can decrease the need for blood transfusions, reduce hospital stays, and cut the cost of care for certain surgical patients, a retrospective study suggests.
Researchers compared the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats—which are based on oxidized regenerated cellulose—to other adjunctive hemostats—flowables, gelatin, and thrombin—in patients undergoing a range of surgical procedures.
The team presented their findings in a poster at the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting. The study was sponsored by Ethicon, makers of the SURGICEL products.
The goal of this research was to compare the healthcare resource utilization, costs, and outcomes associated with SURGICEL products—SURGICEL® ORIGINAL, SURGICEL® NU-KNIT®, SURGICEL® FIBRILLAR™, and SURGICEL® SNOW™—to those associated with other adjunctive hemostats.
The researchers analyzed data from adult patients (18 years and older) from the Premier Research Database who were discharged from the hospital between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012.
Patients had undergone cholecystectomy (n=3045), cardiovascular surgery (n=11,359), hysterectomy (n=4674), or carotid endarterectomy (5445).
The researchers found that fewer units of hemostat were used per discharge among patients who received SURGICEL products than among those who received other hemostats, regardless of the type of surgery.
Hemostat use was 18% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 28% lower for cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 16% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), and 41% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
SURGICEL products were also associated with a reduction in blood transfusions for some patients. Transfusions were reduced by 5% among hysterectomy patients (not significant), 18% in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05), and 32% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The mean length of hospital stay and the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were both lower for certain patients who received SURGICEL products.
Hospital stays were 12% lower in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001). And ICU stays were 3% lower in cholecystectomy patients (not significant) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.05).
ICU costs were not significantly lower for patients who received SURGICEL products. However, the costs of hemostats and all-cause costs were lower with SURGICEL products than with other hemostats.
The cost of hemostats was 59% lower for in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 33% lower in cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 57% lower in hysterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 49% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The all-cause costs per discharge were 1% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), 6% lower for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 14% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001).
Cost savings ranged from $71 to $155 per procedure.
“This study adds to the growing body of evidence that suggests the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats has the potential to reduce burdens associated with bleeding and bleeding-related complications, which translates into cost and resource-use savings for healthcare providers,” said study investigator Jerome Riebman, MD, director of medical affairs at Ethicon.
Dr Riebman and his colleagues did note that this study was subject to limitations. For example, not all of the factors influencing the physicians’ choice of treatment were available in the dataset.
Furthermore, it’s not clear whether the hospitals studied are representative of all US hospitals. And coding errors or omitted procedure/product codes could have led to patient misclassification and potential bias in the results.
Credit: Piotr Bodzek
HOUSTON—A family of hemostatic products can decrease the need for blood transfusions, reduce hospital stays, and cut the cost of care for certain surgical patients, a retrospective study suggests.
Researchers compared the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats—which are based on oxidized regenerated cellulose—to other adjunctive hemostats—flowables, gelatin, and thrombin—in patients undergoing a range of surgical procedures.
The team presented their findings in a poster at the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting. The study was sponsored by Ethicon, makers of the SURGICEL products.
The goal of this research was to compare the healthcare resource utilization, costs, and outcomes associated with SURGICEL products—SURGICEL® ORIGINAL, SURGICEL® NU-KNIT®, SURGICEL® FIBRILLAR™, and SURGICEL® SNOW™—to those associated with other adjunctive hemostats.
The researchers analyzed data from adult patients (18 years and older) from the Premier Research Database who were discharged from the hospital between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012.
Patients had undergone cholecystectomy (n=3045), cardiovascular surgery (n=11,359), hysterectomy (n=4674), or carotid endarterectomy (5445).
The researchers found that fewer units of hemostat were used per discharge among patients who received SURGICEL products than among those who received other hemostats, regardless of the type of surgery.
Hemostat use was 18% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 28% lower for cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 16% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), and 41% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
SURGICEL products were also associated with a reduction in blood transfusions for some patients. Transfusions were reduced by 5% among hysterectomy patients (not significant), 18% in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05), and 32% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The mean length of hospital stay and the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were both lower for certain patients who received SURGICEL products.
Hospital stays were 12% lower in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001). And ICU stays were 3% lower in cholecystectomy patients (not significant) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.05).
ICU costs were not significantly lower for patients who received SURGICEL products. However, the costs of hemostats and all-cause costs were lower with SURGICEL products than with other hemostats.
The cost of hemostats was 59% lower for in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 33% lower in cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 57% lower in hysterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 49% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The all-cause costs per discharge were 1% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), 6% lower for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 14% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001).
Cost savings ranged from $71 to $155 per procedure.
“This study adds to the growing body of evidence that suggests the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats has the potential to reduce burdens associated with bleeding and bleeding-related complications, which translates into cost and resource-use savings for healthcare providers,” said study investigator Jerome Riebman, MD, director of medical affairs at Ethicon.
Dr Riebman and his colleagues did note that this study was subject to limitations. For example, not all of the factors influencing the physicians’ choice of treatment were available in the dataset.
Furthermore, it’s not clear whether the hospitals studied are representative of all US hospitals. And coding errors or omitted procedure/product codes could have led to patient misclassification and potential bias in the results.
Credit: Piotr Bodzek
HOUSTON—A family of hemostatic products can decrease the need for blood transfusions, reduce hospital stays, and cut the cost of care for certain surgical patients, a retrospective study suggests.
Researchers compared the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats—which are based on oxidized regenerated cellulose—to other adjunctive hemostats—flowables, gelatin, and thrombin—in patients undergoing a range of surgical procedures.
The team presented their findings in a poster at the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting. The study was sponsored by Ethicon, makers of the SURGICEL products.
The goal of this research was to compare the healthcare resource utilization, costs, and outcomes associated with SURGICEL products—SURGICEL® ORIGINAL, SURGICEL® NU-KNIT®, SURGICEL® FIBRILLAR™, and SURGICEL® SNOW™—to those associated with other adjunctive hemostats.
The researchers analyzed data from adult patients (18 years and older) from the Premier Research Database who were discharged from the hospital between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012.
Patients had undergone cholecystectomy (n=3045), cardiovascular surgery (n=11,359), hysterectomy (n=4674), or carotid endarterectomy (5445).
The researchers found that fewer units of hemostat were used per discharge among patients who received SURGICEL products than among those who received other hemostats, regardless of the type of surgery.
Hemostat use was 18% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 28% lower for cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 16% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), and 41% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
SURGICEL products were also associated with a reduction in blood transfusions for some patients. Transfusions were reduced by 5% among hysterectomy patients (not significant), 18% in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05), and 32% for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The mean length of hospital stay and the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were both lower for certain patients who received SURGICEL products.
Hospital stays were 12% lower in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.05) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001). And ICU stays were 3% lower in cholecystectomy patients (not significant) and 8% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.05).
ICU costs were not significantly lower for patients who received SURGICEL products. However, the costs of hemostats and all-cause costs were lower with SURGICEL products than with other hemostats.
The cost of hemostats was 59% lower for in cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001), 33% lower in cardiovascular patients (P<0.0001), 57% lower in hysterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 49% lower in carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001).
The all-cause costs per discharge were 1% lower for hysterectomy patients (P<0.05), 6% lower for carotid endarterectomy patients (P<0.0001), and 14% lower for cholecystectomy patients (P<0.0001).
Cost savings ranged from $71 to $155 per procedure.
“This study adds to the growing body of evidence that suggests the SURGICEL family of topical, absorbable hemostats has the potential to reduce burdens associated with bleeding and bleeding-related complications, which translates into cost and resource-use savings for healthcare providers,” said study investigator Jerome Riebman, MD, director of medical affairs at Ethicon.
Dr Riebman and his colleagues did note that this study was subject to limitations. For example, not all of the factors influencing the physicians’ choice of treatment were available in the dataset.
Furthermore, it’s not clear whether the hospitals studied are representative of all US hospitals. And coding errors or omitted procedure/product codes could have led to patient misclassification and potential bias in the results.