User login
You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:
“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”
“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”
“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”
I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.
But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1
It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3
It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.
While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.
1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.
2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.
3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.
You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:
“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”
“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”
“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”
I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.
But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1
It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3
It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.
While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.
You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:
“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”
“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”
“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”
I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.
But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1
It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3
It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.
While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.
1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.
2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.
3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.
1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.
2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.
3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.