Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:18
Display Headline
Driven to distraction

You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:

“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”

“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”

“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”

I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.

But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1

It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3

It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.

While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.

References

1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.

2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.

3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information


Jeff Susman, MD
Editor, JFP

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 56(1)
Publications
Page Number
3
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information


Jeff Susman, MD
Editor, JFP

Author and Disclosure Information


Jeff Susman, MD
Editor, JFP

Article PDF
Article PDF

You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:

“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”

“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”

“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”

I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.

But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1

It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3

It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.

While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.

You say goodbye to your children as they prepare to go out for the evening:

“Don’t forget to smoke a couple of joints before driving in the snow tonight.”

“Grandma, Grandpa, it was great seeing you for the Holidays. To make sure you safely make it home, let’s share a few cocktails before you hit the road.”

“Hi, honey. I should be home in 15 minutes if this traffic doesn’t kill me.”

I suspect few of us would suggest our children or grandparents drive while impaired. But I bet a lot more you have had a cellular conversation while navigating the rush hour. And most of us take solace that our kids carry a cell phone in case of emergency.

But did you know that according to a recent study, “the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with drinking and driving”?1

It’s time we recognize this important public health hazard. A recent review concluded that cellular phone users had a four-fold risk of a “property-damage-only crash,” and this risk was increased regardless of age, gender, or use of a hands-free phone.2 Moreover, while bans on cellphone use have an initial salutary effect, there is a rapid decline in compliance without regular enforcement and publicity.3

It’s certainly odd to see a well-groomed and seemingly sane businessman gesticulating wildly on a downtown street. It’s bad enough that you can’t even go into the airport restroom or a fine restaurant without the constant cacophony of cellular conversation. But amusement turns to horror as a car full of teens, radio blaring, weaves through traffic or a bleary-eyed commuter blithely converses while applying her makeup and juggling her latte.

While I don’t have the ultimate solution to cellular commotion, we should be counseling our patients about this public health hazard. Driven to distraction could mean a detour to death.

References

1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.

2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.

3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.

References

1. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.

2. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.

3. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 56(1)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 56(1)
Page Number
3
Page Number
3
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Driven to distraction
Display Headline
Driven to distraction
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media