Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/05/2025 - 10:31
Display Headline

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of TikTok Skin Care Routines and the Associated Environmental Impact

To the Editor:

The popularity of the social media platform TikTok, which is known for its short-form videos, has surged in recent years. Viral videos demonstrating skin care routines reach millions of viewers,1 showcasing specific products, detailing beauty regimens, and setting fads that many users eagerly follow. These trends often influence consumer behavior—in 2023, viral videos using the tag #TikTokMadeMeBuy lead to a 14% growth in the sale of skin care products.2 However, they also encourage purchasing decisions that may escalate environmental waste through plastic packaging and single-use products. In this study, we analyzed videos on TikTok to assess the environmental impact of trending skin care routines. By examining the types of products promoted, their packaging, and the frequency with which they appear in viral content, we aimed to investigate how these trends, which may be imitated by users, impact the environment.

A search of TikTok videos using #skincareroutine was conducted on June 21, 2024. Sponsored content, non–English language videos, videos without demonstrated skin care routines, and videos showing makeup routines were excluded from our analysis. Data collected from each video included username, date posted, number of likes, total number of skin care products used, number of single-use skin care products used, average amount of product used, number of skin care applicators used, and number of single-use applicators used. Single-use items, defined as those intended for one-time use and subsequent disposal, were identified visually by packaging, manufacturer intent, and common consumer usage patterns. The amount of product used per application was graded on a scale of 1 to 3 (1=pea-sized amount or less; 2=single full pump/spray; 3=multiple pumps/sprays). Videos were categorized as personal (ie, skin care routine walk-throughs by the creator) or autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR)(focused on product sounds and aesthetics).3 A Mann-Whitney U test was utilized to statistically compare the 2 groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (α=0.05). 

A total of 50 videos met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The average number of likes per video was 499,696.15, with skin care routines featuring an average of 6.4 unique products (Table). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.1809) between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes. A total of 320 products were used across the videos, 23 of which were single-use (7.2%).On average, single-use skin care items were used 0.46 times per routine, comprising a mean 7.99% of total products per video. The average score for the amount of product used per application was 2.18. There was no difference in personal vs ASMR videos with regard to the total number of skin care products used or the average amount of product used per application (P>.05). Thirty-three (70.2%) of the 47 applicators used across all videos were single-use. An average of 0.94 applicators per routine were utilized, with a mean 68.83% being single-use applicators. Common single-use products were toner wipes and eye patches, and single-use applicators included cotton pads and plastic spatulas. 

CT116003107-Table

Our findings indicated a prevalence of multiple products and large amount of product used in trending skin care routines, suggesting a shift toward multistep skin care. This implies a high rate of product consumption that may accelerate the carbon footprint associated with skin care products,3 which could contribute to climate change and environmental degradation. Consumers also may feel compelled to purchase and discard numerous partially used products in order to keep up with the latest trends, exacerbating the environmental impact. Furthermore, the utilization of single-use products and applicators contributes to increased plastic waste, pollution, and resource depletion. Single-use items often are difficult to recycle due to their mixed materials and small size,4,5 and therefore they can accumulate in landfills and oceans. This impact can be mitigated by switching to reusable applicators, refillable packaging, and biodegradable materials. 

The substantial average number of likes per video indicates high engagement with skin care content among TikTok users. The continued popularity of complex multi­step skin care routines, despite a weak correlation between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes per video, likely stems from factors such as aesthetic appeal, ASMR effects, and creators’ established followings, which may drive user engagement to contribute to unsustainable consumption patterns. Factors such as presentation style, aesthetics, or creators’ pre-existing online following may have a major impact on how well a video performs on TikTok. The similarity between personal and ASMR videos, particularly in the number of products used and the amount applied, suggests that both formats employ common approaches to meet audience expectations and align with promotional trends, relying more on sensory and aesthetic strategies than substantive differences in skin care routines.

Our use of only one tag in our search as well as the subjective quantity scale limits the generalizability of these findings to broader TikTok skin care content.

Overall, our study underscores the role of brands and social media influencers in skin care education and promotion of sustainable practices. The extensive number of products used and generous application of each product in skin care routines demonstrated in TikTok videos may mislead viewers into believing that using more product improves outcomes, when often, less is more. We recommend that dermatologists counsel patients about informed skin care regimens that prioritize individual needs over social media fads.

References
  1. Pagani K, Lukac D, Martinez R, et al. Slugging: TikTokTM as a source of a viral “harmless” beauty trend. Clin Dermatol. 2022;40:810-812. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.005
  2. Stern C. TikTok drives $31.7B in beauty sales: how viral trends are shaping the future of cosmetics. CosmeticsDesign. August 20, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cosmeticsdesign.com/Article/2024/08/20/tiktok-drives-31.7b-in-beauty-sales-how-viral-trends-are-shaping-the-future-of-cosmetics/
  3. Fountain C. ASMR content saw huge growth on YouTube, but now creators are flocking to TikTok instead. Business Insider. July 4, 2022. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.businessinsider.com/asmr-tiktok-instead-of-youtube-growth-subscribers-2022-7
  4. Rathore S, Schuler B, Park J. Life cycle assessment of multiple dispensing systems used for cosmetic product packaging. Packaging Technol Sci. 2023;36:533-547. doi:10.1002/pts.2729
  5. Shaw S. How to actually recycle your empty beauty products. CNN Underscored. Updated April 17, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/beauty/how-to-recycle-beauty-products
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Aarushi K. Parikh is from Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Aarushi K. Parikh has no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation and Moberg Pharma.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Cutis. 2025 September;116(3):107-108. doi:10.12788/cutis.1259

Issue
Cutis - 116(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
107-108
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Aarushi K. Parikh is from Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Aarushi K. Parikh has no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation and Moberg Pharma.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Cutis. 2025 September;116(3):107-108. doi:10.12788/cutis.1259

Author and Disclosure Information

Aarushi K. Parikh is from Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Aarushi K. Parikh has no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation and Moberg Pharma.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Cutis. 2025 September;116(3):107-108. doi:10.12788/cutis.1259

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

The popularity of the social media platform TikTok, which is known for its short-form videos, has surged in recent years. Viral videos demonstrating skin care routines reach millions of viewers,1 showcasing specific products, detailing beauty regimens, and setting fads that many users eagerly follow. These trends often influence consumer behavior—in 2023, viral videos using the tag #TikTokMadeMeBuy lead to a 14% growth in the sale of skin care products.2 However, they also encourage purchasing decisions that may escalate environmental waste through plastic packaging and single-use products. In this study, we analyzed videos on TikTok to assess the environmental impact of trending skin care routines. By examining the types of products promoted, their packaging, and the frequency with which they appear in viral content, we aimed to investigate how these trends, which may be imitated by users, impact the environment.

A search of TikTok videos using #skincareroutine was conducted on June 21, 2024. Sponsored content, non–English language videos, videos without demonstrated skin care routines, and videos showing makeup routines were excluded from our analysis. Data collected from each video included username, date posted, number of likes, total number of skin care products used, number of single-use skin care products used, average amount of product used, number of skin care applicators used, and number of single-use applicators used. Single-use items, defined as those intended for one-time use and subsequent disposal, were identified visually by packaging, manufacturer intent, and common consumer usage patterns. The amount of product used per application was graded on a scale of 1 to 3 (1=pea-sized amount or less; 2=single full pump/spray; 3=multiple pumps/sprays). Videos were categorized as personal (ie, skin care routine walk-throughs by the creator) or autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR)(focused on product sounds and aesthetics).3 A Mann-Whitney U test was utilized to statistically compare the 2 groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (α=0.05). 

A total of 50 videos met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The average number of likes per video was 499,696.15, with skin care routines featuring an average of 6.4 unique products (Table). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.1809) between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes. A total of 320 products were used across the videos, 23 of which were single-use (7.2%).On average, single-use skin care items were used 0.46 times per routine, comprising a mean 7.99% of total products per video. The average score for the amount of product used per application was 2.18. There was no difference in personal vs ASMR videos with regard to the total number of skin care products used or the average amount of product used per application (P>.05). Thirty-three (70.2%) of the 47 applicators used across all videos were single-use. An average of 0.94 applicators per routine were utilized, with a mean 68.83% being single-use applicators. Common single-use products were toner wipes and eye patches, and single-use applicators included cotton pads and plastic spatulas. 

CT116003107-Table

Our findings indicated a prevalence of multiple products and large amount of product used in trending skin care routines, suggesting a shift toward multistep skin care. This implies a high rate of product consumption that may accelerate the carbon footprint associated with skin care products,3 which could contribute to climate change and environmental degradation. Consumers also may feel compelled to purchase and discard numerous partially used products in order to keep up with the latest trends, exacerbating the environmental impact. Furthermore, the utilization of single-use products and applicators contributes to increased plastic waste, pollution, and resource depletion. Single-use items often are difficult to recycle due to their mixed materials and small size,4,5 and therefore they can accumulate in landfills and oceans. This impact can be mitigated by switching to reusable applicators, refillable packaging, and biodegradable materials. 

The substantial average number of likes per video indicates high engagement with skin care content among TikTok users. The continued popularity of complex multi­step skin care routines, despite a weak correlation between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes per video, likely stems from factors such as aesthetic appeal, ASMR effects, and creators’ established followings, which may drive user engagement to contribute to unsustainable consumption patterns. Factors such as presentation style, aesthetics, or creators’ pre-existing online following may have a major impact on how well a video performs on TikTok. The similarity between personal and ASMR videos, particularly in the number of products used and the amount applied, suggests that both formats employ common approaches to meet audience expectations and align with promotional trends, relying more on sensory and aesthetic strategies than substantive differences in skin care routines.

Our use of only one tag in our search as well as the subjective quantity scale limits the generalizability of these findings to broader TikTok skin care content.

Overall, our study underscores the role of brands and social media influencers in skin care education and promotion of sustainable practices. The extensive number of products used and generous application of each product in skin care routines demonstrated in TikTok videos may mislead viewers into believing that using more product improves outcomes, when often, less is more. We recommend that dermatologists counsel patients about informed skin care regimens that prioritize individual needs over social media fads.

To the Editor:

The popularity of the social media platform TikTok, which is known for its short-form videos, has surged in recent years. Viral videos demonstrating skin care routines reach millions of viewers,1 showcasing specific products, detailing beauty regimens, and setting fads that many users eagerly follow. These trends often influence consumer behavior—in 2023, viral videos using the tag #TikTokMadeMeBuy lead to a 14% growth in the sale of skin care products.2 However, they also encourage purchasing decisions that may escalate environmental waste through plastic packaging and single-use products. In this study, we analyzed videos on TikTok to assess the environmental impact of trending skin care routines. By examining the types of products promoted, their packaging, and the frequency with which they appear in viral content, we aimed to investigate how these trends, which may be imitated by users, impact the environment.

A search of TikTok videos using #skincareroutine was conducted on June 21, 2024. Sponsored content, non–English language videos, videos without demonstrated skin care routines, and videos showing makeup routines were excluded from our analysis. Data collected from each video included username, date posted, number of likes, total number of skin care products used, number of single-use skin care products used, average amount of product used, number of skin care applicators used, and number of single-use applicators used. Single-use items, defined as those intended for one-time use and subsequent disposal, were identified visually by packaging, manufacturer intent, and common consumer usage patterns. The amount of product used per application was graded on a scale of 1 to 3 (1=pea-sized amount or less; 2=single full pump/spray; 3=multiple pumps/sprays). Videos were categorized as personal (ie, skin care routine walk-throughs by the creator) or autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR)(focused on product sounds and aesthetics).3 A Mann-Whitney U test was utilized to statistically compare the 2 groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (α=0.05). 

A total of 50 videos met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The average number of likes per video was 499,696.15, with skin care routines featuring an average of 6.4 unique products (Table). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.1809) between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes. A total of 320 products were used across the videos, 23 of which were single-use (7.2%).On average, single-use skin care items were used 0.46 times per routine, comprising a mean 7.99% of total products per video. The average score for the amount of product used per application was 2.18. There was no difference in personal vs ASMR videos with regard to the total number of skin care products used or the average amount of product used per application (P>.05). Thirty-three (70.2%) of the 47 applicators used across all videos were single-use. An average of 0.94 applicators per routine were utilized, with a mean 68.83% being single-use applicators. Common single-use products were toner wipes and eye patches, and single-use applicators included cotton pads and plastic spatulas. 

CT116003107-Table

Our findings indicated a prevalence of multiple products and large amount of product used in trending skin care routines, suggesting a shift toward multistep skin care. This implies a high rate of product consumption that may accelerate the carbon footprint associated with skin care products,3 which could contribute to climate change and environmental degradation. Consumers also may feel compelled to purchase and discard numerous partially used products in order to keep up with the latest trends, exacerbating the environmental impact. Furthermore, the utilization of single-use products and applicators contributes to increased plastic waste, pollution, and resource depletion. Single-use items often are difficult to recycle due to their mixed materials and small size,4,5 and therefore they can accumulate in landfills and oceans. This impact can be mitigated by switching to reusable applicators, refillable packaging, and biodegradable materials. 

The substantial average number of likes per video indicates high engagement with skin care content among TikTok users. The continued popularity of complex multi­step skin care routines, despite a weak correlation between the number of skin care products used and the number of likes per video, likely stems from factors such as aesthetic appeal, ASMR effects, and creators’ established followings, which may drive user engagement to contribute to unsustainable consumption patterns. Factors such as presentation style, aesthetics, or creators’ pre-existing online following may have a major impact on how well a video performs on TikTok. The similarity between personal and ASMR videos, particularly in the number of products used and the amount applied, suggests that both formats employ common approaches to meet audience expectations and align with promotional trends, relying more on sensory and aesthetic strategies than substantive differences in skin care routines.

Our use of only one tag in our search as well as the subjective quantity scale limits the generalizability of these findings to broader TikTok skin care content.

Overall, our study underscores the role of brands and social media influencers in skin care education and promotion of sustainable practices. The extensive number of products used and generous application of each product in skin care routines demonstrated in TikTok videos may mislead viewers into believing that using more product improves outcomes, when often, less is more. We recommend that dermatologists counsel patients about informed skin care regimens that prioritize individual needs over social media fads.

References
  1. Pagani K, Lukac D, Martinez R, et al. Slugging: TikTokTM as a source of a viral “harmless” beauty trend. Clin Dermatol. 2022;40:810-812. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.005
  2. Stern C. TikTok drives $31.7B in beauty sales: how viral trends are shaping the future of cosmetics. CosmeticsDesign. August 20, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cosmeticsdesign.com/Article/2024/08/20/tiktok-drives-31.7b-in-beauty-sales-how-viral-trends-are-shaping-the-future-of-cosmetics/
  3. Fountain C. ASMR content saw huge growth on YouTube, but now creators are flocking to TikTok instead. Business Insider. July 4, 2022. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.businessinsider.com/asmr-tiktok-instead-of-youtube-growth-subscribers-2022-7
  4. Rathore S, Schuler B, Park J. Life cycle assessment of multiple dispensing systems used for cosmetic product packaging. Packaging Technol Sci. 2023;36:533-547. doi:10.1002/pts.2729
  5. Shaw S. How to actually recycle your empty beauty products. CNN Underscored. Updated April 17, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/beauty/how-to-recycle-beauty-products
References
  1. Pagani K, Lukac D, Martinez R, et al. Slugging: TikTokTM as a source of a viral “harmless” beauty trend. Clin Dermatol. 2022;40:810-812. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.005
  2. Stern C. TikTok drives $31.7B in beauty sales: how viral trends are shaping the future of cosmetics. CosmeticsDesign. August 20, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cosmeticsdesign.com/Article/2024/08/20/tiktok-drives-31.7b-in-beauty-sales-how-viral-trends-are-shaping-the-future-of-cosmetics/
  3. Fountain C. ASMR content saw huge growth on YouTube, but now creators are flocking to TikTok instead. Business Insider. July 4, 2022. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.businessinsider.com/asmr-tiktok-instead-of-youtube-growth-subscribers-2022-7
  4. Rathore S, Schuler B, Park J. Life cycle assessment of multiple dispensing systems used for cosmetic product packaging. Packaging Technol Sci. 2023;36:533-547. doi:10.1002/pts.2729
  5. Shaw S. How to actually recycle your empty beauty products. CNN Underscored. Updated April 17, 2024. Accessed June 24, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/beauty/how-to-recycle-beauty-products
Issue
Cutis - 116(3)
Issue
Cutis - 116(3)
Page Number
107-108
Page Number
107-108
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of TikTok Skin Care Routines and the Associated Environmental Impact

Display Headline

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of TikTok Skin Care Routines and the Associated Environmental Impact

Sections
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • Social media platforms are increasingly influential in shaping consumer skin care habits, particularly among younger demographics.
  • Dermatologists should be aware of the aestheticdriven nature of online skin care trends when advising patients on product use.
  • Viral skin care routines often feature multiple products and applicators, potentially encouraging excessive product use and waste.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 09/04/2025 - 18:18
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 09/04/2025 - 18:18
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 09/04/2025 - 18:18
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date
Thu, 09/04/2025 - 18:18