User login
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.