ST-segment elevation: Differential diagnosis, caveats

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 06/07/2018 - 14:37
Display Headline
ST-segment elevation: Differential diagnosis, caveats

Figure 1.
When the ST segment is elevated on the electrocardiogram, our first concern is whether the patient is having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, a number of other conditions can cause ST elevation, and to complicate matters, some of these can coexist with STEMI.

Nevertheless, careful attention to the ST-T and QRS-complex configurations often allows diagnosis of the cause of ST elevation (Figure 1, Table 1). This paper discusses the differential diagnosis of ST elevation.

MEASURED AT THE J POINT OR LATER

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 Some authors prefer measuring the magnitude of the ST deviation 40 to 80 msec after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment.2,3

ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

A diagnosis of STEMI that mandates emergency reperfusion requires ST elevation equaling or exceeding the following cut-points, in at least two contiguous leads (using the standardization of 1.0 mV = 10 mm)4,5:

  • 1 mm in all standard leads other than V2 and V3
  • 2.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men younger than age 40, 2 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men age 40 and older, and 1.5 mm in these leads in women
  • 0.5 mm in the posterior chest leads V7 to V9; ST elevation is attenuated in the posterior leads because of their greater distance from the heart, explaining the lower cut-point.6

While ST elevation that falls below these cut-points may be a normal variant, any ST elevation or depression (≥ 0.5 mm) may be abnormal and may necessitate further evaluation for ischemia, particularly when the clinical setting or the ST morphology suggests ischemia or when other signs of ischemia such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are also present on the electrocardiogram.

Conversely, ST elevation that exceeds these cut-points may not represent STEMI. In an analysis of patients with chest pain manifesting ST elevation, only 15% were eventually diagnosed with STEMI.7 In addition to size, careful attention to the morphology of the ST segment and the associated features is critical (Figure 1).

Other features of STEMI

Figure 2. Diffuse ST-segment elevation with ST-segment depression in lead aVR. This initially suggests pericarditis. PR depression in leads II, aVF, V5, and V6 further suggests pericarditis. But the presence of features of pericarditis does not necessarily rule out STEMI. The five STEMI features must be ruled out. In this case, the ST-segment morphology and the abnormally wide T wave are features of STEMI. The ST elevation has an upwardly convex shape with a wide and high T wave fused with the ST segment, typical of STEMI (leads V2–V4, arrows). Also, the size of the ST elevation (ie, > 5 mm in V2–V4 and larger than the QRS complex in V4, a feature called “tombstoning”) is more consistent with STEMI than with pericarditis. In this patient, the left anterior descending artery was found to be occluded on coronary arteriography.
In STEMI, the ST elevation is typically a convex or a straight oblique line, blending with a wide T wave to form a dome.8 But ST elevation may be concave in up to 40% of anterior STEMIs, especially in the early stage.3,9,10 The nonconcave morphology is highly specific but not sensitive for the diagnosis of anterior STEMI.3,8,9

Four other features characteristic of STEMI may be present (Figures 2 and 3):

  • Concomitant T-wave abnormalities (wide, ample, or inverted T waves)
  • Q waves
  • ST depression in the reciprocal leads. Reciprocal ST depression is seen in all inferior STEMIs and in 70% of anterior STEMIs.11,12 Diffuse ST elevation mimicking pericarditis may be seen with midvessel occlusion of a left anterior descending artery that wraps around the apex and supplies part of the inferior wall.
  • Figure 3. In a patient with lung cancer, sinus tachycardia is seen with diffuse ST-segment elevation, along with ST-segment depression in aVR. The QRS voltage is low, particularly when compared with the electrocardio-gram recorded a few days earlier (left lower panel). PR depression is seen in lead II. The combination of these findings may suggest pericarditis with a pericardial effusion. However, the ST-T morphology in lead V2, where the ST and T are blended to form one dome, is characteristic of STEMI (top arrow). Moreover, the ST elevation and T wave in leads V2–V4 are larger than the QRS, the QRS voltage is “shrinking” (arrowhead), and the R wave is pulled up by the ST segment (star); this is called “tombstoning.” All these features are characteristic of STEMI, wherein the R wave and the QRS complex shrink before forming a deep Q wave. In fact, an electrocardiogram recorded 1 hour later (right lower panel) shows a fully developed Q wave in lead V2 (bottom arrow).
    ST or T-wave amplitude may approximate or exceed the QRS amplitude in at least one lead.3,13,14 This finding is characteristic of STEMI, in which the QRS “shrinks” as the infarcted area becomes electrically neutral, whereas the ST-T segments become ample.3,13 In fact, early STEMI may be characterized by a small R wave that seems to be “pulled up” by the elevated ST segment. A small or absent R wave along with an ample, convex ST segment that fuses with the T wave and exceeds the height of the remaining R wave is called “tombstoning” (Figure 3). Tombstoning is most commonly seen with anterior infarction and implies more extensive myocardial damage and a worse prognosis than STEMI without tombstoning.15

Note that ST elevation may not be acute STEMI but an old STEMI with a chronically dysfunctional myocardium (dyskinetic or aneurysmal myocardium). In fact, an old STEMI may manifest as a chronic, persistent ST elevation along with Q waves, and T waves may be inverted or upright, but not ample.14 A history of an old MI, old electrocardiograms, if available, and quick bedside echocardiography may allow the diagnosis. In the case of an old dyskinetic infarct, echocardiography shows a thin, bright (scarred), and possibly aneurysmal myocardium, whereas in acute STEMI, the myocardium is neither thin nor scarred yet. If the patient does not report a history of MI, if the T wave is ample (> 75% the size of QRS), or if the patient presents with atypical ongoing angina, presume it is acute STEMI.

 

 

EARLY REPOLARIZATION

Early repolarization is a normal variant of ST elevation that equals or exceeds 1 mm (measured at the J point). It is highly prevalent in people under age 40 and remains prevalent in middle-aged people.

Two distinct and sometimes coexistent forms of early repolarization have been described: (1) ST elevation in the anterior leads V1 to V3,16–19 and (2) ST elevation in the lateral leads (V4 to V6, I, aVL) or inferior leads.18–22 The prevalence of the first form—ie, ST elevation of 1 mm or more in any of the leads V1 through V3—is 60% to 90% in men  age 45 and younger, 20% to 40% in men over age 45, and about 10% in women of any age.16 Thus, this form of early repolarization is called “normal male pattern.”

Even early repolarization that involves the lateral or inferior leads is common, with a prevalence of about 15% in people ages 30 to 40 and about 5% to 10% in those 40 to 65.20–23 It is two to four times more prevalent in men and three times more prevalent in African Americans. It is also highly prevalent in athletes younger than 25 (about 30% to 40%).22

Figure 4. Early repolarization with ST-segment elevation is seen in the inferior leads and in the anterolateral leads V2 to V6. ST elevation is most prominent in lead V4 and lead II, with a concavely upward ST morphology and a notch at the J point (arrows and left magnified image). In half of early repolarization cases, the J point is smooth but well demarcated (right magnified image). Note the slight PR depression in leads II and V5. Slight PR depression may be seen in normal individuals and corresponds to the normal atrial repolarization.
Either way, early repolarization closely resembles the ST elevation of pericarditis and has the following features (Figure 4):

  • The ST segment is concave upward, and the J point is well demarcated and may be notched or slurred (Figure 1).
  • ST elevation is usually no more than 3 mm.
  • ST elevation may be limited to the anterior leads or, in many instances, may extend to the inferior or lateral leads. Early repolarization is very rarely limited to the limb leads, and involvement of some precordial leads is the rule.18,19 The ST segment is depressed in lead aVR in 50% of patients.18,19
  • Figure 5. Early repolarization with a normal variant T-wave inversion in a 33-year-old black man. The ST segment is elevated with a notched J point in leads V2 to V5
    The T wave is usually ample and may be more than 10 mm tall in the precordial leads in one-third of patients,17 but as opposed to the ample T wave of STEMI, it is not broad and remains smaller than the QRS complex. The ample T wave distinguishes early repolarization from pericarditis, and explains the low ST-T ratio in lead V6. In up to 10% of young black men, the T wave has a terminal inversion in leads V3 to V5, and occasionally in V1 and V2, mimicking infarction (Figure 5).24
  • The QRS complex tends to have prominent precordial voltage, in sharp contrast to STEMI, in which QRS shrinking occurs.3,17,22

The early repolarization pattern may be intermittent, may vary among serial electrocardiograms, may decrease with a rise in sympathetic tone, as observed during exercise, and may increase with a rise in vagal tone.18,19,25,26  Although it is usually a benign finding, the early repolarization pattern in leads other than V1 to V3 has been associated with an increased risk of sudden death, particularly when the ST elevation is horizontal-descending rather than upsloping and, possibly, when early repolarization involves the inferior leads with a J point that is notched or elevated 2 mm or more.20,22

PERICARDITIS

Figure 6. Diffuse ST-segment elevation in most leads, with ST depression in lead aVR and an isoelectric ST segment in V1. None of the STEMI features are present: ST elevation is concave upward, no reciprocal ST depression is seen except in lead aVR; the T wave is not wide, inverted, or ample (in relation to the QRS complex); and no Q wave is seen. Furthermore, ST elevation does not exceed 5 mm; ST and T heights are smaller than QRS height; and PR depression is present (circled areas). As opposed to early repolarization, the ratio of ST to T in leads V5 and V6 exceeds 25%. This is consistent with pericarditis, and the hospital course of this patient confirmed this diagnosis.
In pericarditis, ST elevation is concave upward and is widespread to more than one region without reciprocal ST depression, except for the frequent ST depression in leads aVR and V1 (64%)27; ST elevation is seldom greater than 4 to 5 mm (Figure 6).27,28 Since the subepicardial injury is diffuse in pericarditis, the axis of the ST segment follows the anatomic axis of the heart and is generally +45° in the frontal plane. Thus, ST depression is seen in leads aVR and V1; ST elevation is highest in leads II, V5, and V6 and is less in leads III and aVL, where the ST segment may occasionally be depressed.29

Transient PR depression greater than 1 mm is often seen, particularly in leads II, aVF, and V4 to V6, and represents atrial subepicardial injury. PR depression in those leads is always associated with PR elevation in lead aVR and sometimes V1. PR changes often coexist with ST changes but may be isolated and may precede ST changes.30 PR depression is characteristic of pericarditis but may be seen in early repolarization, where it is less marked than in pericarditis (< 0.8 mm) and implies early repolarization of the atrial tissue,31 and in MI, where it implies atrial infarction with atrial injury pattern.

Classically, it is said that in pericarditis, unlike in STEMI, the T wave does not invert until the ST elevation subsides. In reality, up to 40% of patients develop a notched or biphasic positive-negative T wave before full return of the ST segment to the baseline.27,32 And if T-wave inversion antedates pericarditis, concomitant ST elevation and T-wave inversion may be seen once pericarditis develops. However, the T wave inverts less deeply and less completely than in STEMI, and the corrected QT interval remains normal even when the T wave inverts.

Three criteria distinguish pericarditis from early repolarization (but not from STEMI):

  • PR depression greater than 1 mm
  • ST-segment depression in lead V1
  • A ratio of ST-segment height to T-wave height of at least 25% in lead V6, V5, V4, or I. This feature distinguishes pericarditis from early repolarization with a high sensitivity and specificity. In pericarditis, the T waves have normal or reduced amplitude, and the ST-T ratio is therefore high,33 whereas in early repolarization the T waves are tall, so the ST-T ratio is less than 25%.

Widespread ST elevation may be seen with both pericarditis and early repolarization. ST elevation limited to the anterior leads is more likely to be early repolarization than pericarditis.

LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

Figure 7. Supraventricular tachycardia with a typical left bundle branch block pattern in leads I and aVL. Concordant ST-segment elevation is seen in leads I and aVL, while concordant ST depression is seen in the inferior leads (arrows). The ST elevation in lead V2 is discordant but is disproportionately high in relation to the QRS (well above 25% of the QRS height). All these features are diagnostic of STEMI.
In left bundle branch block, a deep and wide S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3 and sometimes in the inferior leads, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex—ie, directed opposite to the QRS (Figures 7–9). The ST elevation is typically concave upward.8,34 Occasionally, ST elevation may be straight or convex, mimicking the dome of STEMI. In the lateral leads, the discordant ST segment is depressed, mimicking a reciprocal ST change.

The following findings imply MI:

  • Figure 8. Left bundle branch block with discordant ST-segment changes. However, the T wave is wide and fused with the ST segment in a domed morphology, and the T wave is larger than the QRS in leads V4, V5, and II (arrows). This implies the diagnosis of STEMI with hyperacute T waves. This patient had an occluded left anterior descending coronary artery.
    ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS complex. Moreover, since ST deviation is mandatory with left bundle branch block, a “normal-looking” ST segment implies ischemia.
  • Inverted T waves concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3). Across the precordial leads, T waves may transition from positive to negative one lead earlier or later than the QRS and ST transition. Therefore, even in the absence of ischemia, the T wave may be inverted in lead V3, in which the QRS is deeply negative and the ST is still elevated (negative T-wave concordance in one lead). Also, the T wave may be upright in leads V5, V6, and I where QRS is upright and the ST segment is depressed (positive T-wave concordance does not imply ischemia).
  • Figure 9. Left bundle branch block with abnormal T waves. Panels A and B show discordant ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3 but concordant T wave inversion (A) or biphasic T wave (B). This is consistent with an anterior injury pattern. Panel C shows concordant T-wave inversion in the inferior leads, consistent with inferior injury. Panel D shows a large concordant T wave in lead V6, larger than the QRS, consistent with injury.
    In addition to concordance, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. For example, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is larger than the QRS height implies ischemia. A discordant ST elevation greater than 5 mm has been suggested by Sgarbossa et al35 as a diagnostic feature of STEMI; however, this feature is seen in 10% of control patients with left bundle branch block and no STEMI, and it is thus poorly specific and also poorly sensitive, frequently missing STEMI.35–37 Smith et al36 have suggested that a discordant ST elevation of at least 25% of the S-wave depth is a far more sensitive and accurate feature but one that may still be found in up to 10% of control patients.36
 

 

LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY

In left ventricular hypertrophy, a deep S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex. Rarely, ST elevation may be straight or convex. The following findings imply MI:

  • ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS.
  • Inverted T waves that are concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3).
  • A discordant ST segment or a T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. In left ventricular hypertrophy, ST elevation is usually less than 2.5 mm in leads V1 to V3 and is rarely seen in the inferior leads, where it would be less than 1 mm.34 When ST elevation is seen in leads V1 to V3 in left ventricular hypertrophy, an ST magnitude of 25% or more of the total QRS voltage has a 91% specificity for STEMI.34

On another note, right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may lead to ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion, but not to ST elevation. Thus, ST elevation occurring with right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block implies STEMI. While only left bundle branch block poses a diagnostic challenge, both types of bundle branch block, if secondary to STEMI, represent equally high-risk categories.38

PREEXCITATION

Figure 10. At first glance, it seems there is ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads II, III, and aVF, with a wide Q wave. Moreover, there is a wide and tall R wave in lead V1 suggesting an associated posterior infarction. All this is consistent with acute inferoposterior STEMI. On further analysis, however, a slur is seen on the upslope of QRS in leads V1 to V6 (arrows), and the P wave is “riding” this slur. In the inferior leads, the P wave is riding the Q wave, which is in fact a negative delta wave. Thus, this electrocardiogram represents preexcitation. The ST deviations are secondary to the preexcitation and have an orientation opposite to the delta wave.
Preexcitation may be associated with negative delta waves that mimic Q waves, and with ST elevation in the leads where the negative delta waves are seen, ie, ST elevation discordant with the delta wave (Figure 10). The QRS morphology and the delta wave allow preexcitation to be distinguished from STEMI.

HYPERKALEMIA

Figure 11. There are ST-segment elevations in leads V1–V4, ST-segment depressions in the inferior leads, and peaked T waves in leads V3–V5. These T waves have a narrow base and seem to “pull” the ST segment, creating ST elevation in the anterior leads and ST depression in the inferior leads (arrows). This shape is consistent with hyperkalemia. In addition, the downsloping ST elevation seen in V1 and V2 is consistent with hyperkalemia (arrowhead). Occasionally, STEMI may have a similar ST-T shape. An rSR’ pattern is seen in V1–V2; this is consistent with STEMI but also with hyperkalemia, in which conduction blocks are common. The serum potassium level was 7.4 mmol/L (normal 3.5–5), and coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries.
The most common finding in hyperkalemia is a peaked, narrow-based T wave that is usually, but not necessarily, tall. ST elevation may be evident in leads V1 to V3 (Figure 11). In contrast with hyperkalemia, the T wave of STEMI is typically wide.

OTHER CAUSES OF ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy mimics all electrocardiographic features of anteroapical STEMI. ST elevation may extend to the inferior leads but cannot be isolated in the inferior leads.39 As in apical STEMI, reciprocal ST depression is uncommon. Within 24 to 48 hours, ST elevation evolves into deep anterior T-wave inversion and a prolonged QT interval. Transient Q waves may be seen.

Myocarditis

Myocarditis may have one of two electrocardiographic patterns: a pericarditis pattern, or a typical STEMI pattern with Q waves sometimes localized to one area.40

Atrial flutter waves

Figure 12. Atrial flutter that simulates ST-segment elevation. An “F” indicates the negative flutter wave; an asterisk indicates the upslope of the flutter wave that is superimposed on the ST segment, mimicking ST elevation.
Atrial flutter waves, particularly of 2:1 atrial flutter, may deform the ST segment so that it mimics an injury pattern on the electrocardiogram. Flutter waves may mimic ST elevation or ST depression (Figure 12).

Large pulmonary embolism

A large pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in the anterior leads or the inferior leads, or both, reflective of cor pulmonale. Less commonly, ST elevation in the anterior or inferior leads is seen. In fact, changes of both anterior and inferior ischemia should always suggest a pulmonary embolism.41,42

Brugada syndrome

Figure 13. Type 1 Brugada pattern in V1 and V1, with a downsloping ST-segment elevation that creates a pseudo-R’ wave (pseudo-right bundle branch block). The QRS does not have a right bundle branch block morphology in leads V5 and V6.
Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST elevation and a right bundle branch block or pseudo-right bundle branch block pattern in at least two of the leads V1 to V3. In pseudo-right bundle branch block, the QRS adopts an rSR morphology in the anterior leads but is normal in the lateral leads. Type 1 Brugada pattern, the pattern that is most specifically associated with sudden death, is characterized by a coved, downsloping ST elevation of 2 mm or more with T-wave inversion (Figure 13).43 The Brugada pattern can be transient, triggered by fever, cocaine, or class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Hyperkalemia, Brugada syndrome, and sometimes pulmonary embolism are characterized by an ST elevation that slopes downward (Figures 11 and 13), which contrasts with the upsloping, convex ST elevation of STEMI.

References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST-segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982–991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2001:194–207.
  3. Smith SW, Khalil A, Henry TD, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:45–56.e2.
  4. American College of Emergency Physicians; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:e78–e140.
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012; 126:2020–2035.
  6. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506–511.
  7. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Martin ML, Beagle C, Aufderheide TP. Cause of ST-segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:25–28.
  8. Brady WJ, Syverud SA, Beagle C, et al. Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:961–967.
  9. Smith SW. Upwardly concave ST-segment morphology is common in acute left anterior descending coronary occlusion. J Emerg Med 2006; 31:69–77.
  10. Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, et al. Value of ST-segment elevation pattern in predicting infarct size and left ventricular function at discharge in patients with reperfused acute anterior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1999; 137:522–527.
  11. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Mager A, Strasberg B, Rechavia E. ST segment depression in a VL: a sensitive marker for acute inferior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1993; 14:4–7.
  12. Engelen DJ, Gorgels AP, Cheriex EC, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in localizing the occlusion site in the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:389–395.
  13. Collins MS, Carter JE, Dougherty JM, Majercik SM, Hodsden JE, Logue EE. Hyperacute T-wave criteria using computer ECG analysis. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:114–120.
  14. Smith SW. T/QRS ratio best distinguishes ventricular aneurysm from anterior myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:279–287.
  15. Balci B. Tombstoning ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009; 5:273–278.
  16. Surawicz B, Parikh SR. Prevalence of male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in the normal ECG of males and females from childhood to old age. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1870–1876.
  17. Klatsky AL, Oehm R, Cooper RA, Udaltsova N, Armstrong MA. The early repolarization normal variant electrocardiogram: correlates and consequences. Am J Med 2003; 115:171–177.
  18. Mehta M, Jain AC, Mehta A. Early repolarization. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22:59–65.
  19. Mehta MC, Jain AC. Early repolarization on scalar electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sci 1995; 309:305–311.
  20. Rollin A, Maury P, Bongard V, et al. Prevalence, prognosis, and identification of the malignant form of early repolarization pattern in a population-based study. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1302–1308.
  21. Tikkanen JT, Anttonen O, Junttila MJ, et al. Long-term outcome associated with early repolarization on electrocardiography. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2529–2537.
  22. Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Anttonen O, et al. Early repolarization: electrocardiographic phenotypes associated with favorable long-term outcome. Circulation 2011; 123:2666–2673.
  23. Noseworthy PA, Tikkanen JT, Porthan K, et al. The early repolarization pattern in the general population: clinical correlates and heritability. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2284–2289.
  24. Wasserburger RH. Observations on the juvenile pattern of adult negro males. Am J Med 1955; 18:428–437.
  25. Kralios FA, Martin L, Burgess MJ, Millar K. Local ventricular repolarization changes due to sympathetic nerve-branch stimulation. Am J Physiol 1975; 228:1621–1626.
  26. Spratt KA, Borans SM, Michelson EL. Early repolarization: normalization of the electrocardiogram with exercise as a clinically useful diagnostic feature. J Invasive Cardiol 1995; 7:238–242.
  27. Surawicz B, Lasseter KC. Electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26:471–474.
  28. Hull E. The electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1961; 7:21–32.
  29. Spodick DH. Diagnostic electrocardiographic sequences in acute pericarditis. Significance of PR segment and PR vector changes. Circulation 1973; 48:575–580.
  30. Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA 2003; 289:1150–1153.
  31. Charles MA, Bensinger TA, Glasser SP. Atrial injury current in pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1973; 131:657–662.
  32. Noth PH, Barnes HR. Electrocardiographic changes associated with pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1940; 65:291–320.
  33. Ginzton LE, Laks MM. The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: new electrocardiographic criteria. Circulation 1982; 65:1004–1009.
  34. Armstrong EJ, Kulkarni AR, Bhave PD, et al. Electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:977–983.
  35. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:481–487.
  36. Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, Dvorak DM, Pearce LA. Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:766–776.
  37. Madias JE, Sinha A, Agarwal H, Ashtiani R. ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3 in patients with LBBB. J Electrocardiol 2001; 34:87–88.
  38. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Topol EJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:105–110.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858–865.
  40. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876–890.
  41. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298–303.
  42. Glancy DL, Mikdadi GM. Syncope in a 67-year-old man. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2005; 18:74–75.
  43. Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, et al; Study Group on the Molecular Basis of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome: consensus report. Circulation 2002; 106:2514–2519.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, 3rd Floor, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70112; e-mail: ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 82(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
373-384
Legacy Keywords
ST, ST segment, ST segment elevation, ST elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, early repolarization, pericarditis, left bundle branch block, hyperkalemia, Elias Hanna, David Glancy
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, 3rd Floor, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70112; e-mail: ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, 3rd Floor, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70112; e-mail: ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Figure 1.
When the ST segment is elevated on the electrocardiogram, our first concern is whether the patient is having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, a number of other conditions can cause ST elevation, and to complicate matters, some of these can coexist with STEMI.

Nevertheless, careful attention to the ST-T and QRS-complex configurations often allows diagnosis of the cause of ST elevation (Figure 1, Table 1). This paper discusses the differential diagnosis of ST elevation.

MEASURED AT THE J POINT OR LATER

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 Some authors prefer measuring the magnitude of the ST deviation 40 to 80 msec after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment.2,3

ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

A diagnosis of STEMI that mandates emergency reperfusion requires ST elevation equaling or exceeding the following cut-points, in at least two contiguous leads (using the standardization of 1.0 mV = 10 mm)4,5:

  • 1 mm in all standard leads other than V2 and V3
  • 2.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men younger than age 40, 2 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men age 40 and older, and 1.5 mm in these leads in women
  • 0.5 mm in the posterior chest leads V7 to V9; ST elevation is attenuated in the posterior leads because of their greater distance from the heart, explaining the lower cut-point.6

While ST elevation that falls below these cut-points may be a normal variant, any ST elevation or depression (≥ 0.5 mm) may be abnormal and may necessitate further evaluation for ischemia, particularly when the clinical setting or the ST morphology suggests ischemia or when other signs of ischemia such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are also present on the electrocardiogram.

Conversely, ST elevation that exceeds these cut-points may not represent STEMI. In an analysis of patients with chest pain manifesting ST elevation, only 15% were eventually diagnosed with STEMI.7 In addition to size, careful attention to the morphology of the ST segment and the associated features is critical (Figure 1).

Other features of STEMI

Figure 2. Diffuse ST-segment elevation with ST-segment depression in lead aVR. This initially suggests pericarditis. PR depression in leads II, aVF, V5, and V6 further suggests pericarditis. But the presence of features of pericarditis does not necessarily rule out STEMI. The five STEMI features must be ruled out. In this case, the ST-segment morphology and the abnormally wide T wave are features of STEMI. The ST elevation has an upwardly convex shape with a wide and high T wave fused with the ST segment, typical of STEMI (leads V2–V4, arrows). Also, the size of the ST elevation (ie, > 5 mm in V2–V4 and larger than the QRS complex in V4, a feature called “tombstoning”) is more consistent with STEMI than with pericarditis. In this patient, the left anterior descending artery was found to be occluded on coronary arteriography.
In STEMI, the ST elevation is typically a convex or a straight oblique line, blending with a wide T wave to form a dome.8 But ST elevation may be concave in up to 40% of anterior STEMIs, especially in the early stage.3,9,10 The nonconcave morphology is highly specific but not sensitive for the diagnosis of anterior STEMI.3,8,9

Four other features characteristic of STEMI may be present (Figures 2 and 3):

  • Concomitant T-wave abnormalities (wide, ample, or inverted T waves)
  • Q waves
  • ST depression in the reciprocal leads. Reciprocal ST depression is seen in all inferior STEMIs and in 70% of anterior STEMIs.11,12 Diffuse ST elevation mimicking pericarditis may be seen with midvessel occlusion of a left anterior descending artery that wraps around the apex and supplies part of the inferior wall.
  • Figure 3. In a patient with lung cancer, sinus tachycardia is seen with diffuse ST-segment elevation, along with ST-segment depression in aVR. The QRS voltage is low, particularly when compared with the electrocardio-gram recorded a few days earlier (left lower panel). PR depression is seen in lead II. The combination of these findings may suggest pericarditis with a pericardial effusion. However, the ST-T morphology in lead V2, where the ST and T are blended to form one dome, is characteristic of STEMI (top arrow). Moreover, the ST elevation and T wave in leads V2–V4 are larger than the QRS, the QRS voltage is “shrinking” (arrowhead), and the R wave is pulled up by the ST segment (star); this is called “tombstoning.” All these features are characteristic of STEMI, wherein the R wave and the QRS complex shrink before forming a deep Q wave. In fact, an electrocardiogram recorded 1 hour later (right lower panel) shows a fully developed Q wave in lead V2 (bottom arrow).
    ST or T-wave amplitude may approximate or exceed the QRS amplitude in at least one lead.3,13,14 This finding is characteristic of STEMI, in which the QRS “shrinks” as the infarcted area becomes electrically neutral, whereas the ST-T segments become ample.3,13 In fact, early STEMI may be characterized by a small R wave that seems to be “pulled up” by the elevated ST segment. A small or absent R wave along with an ample, convex ST segment that fuses with the T wave and exceeds the height of the remaining R wave is called “tombstoning” (Figure 3). Tombstoning is most commonly seen with anterior infarction and implies more extensive myocardial damage and a worse prognosis than STEMI without tombstoning.15

Note that ST elevation may not be acute STEMI but an old STEMI with a chronically dysfunctional myocardium (dyskinetic or aneurysmal myocardium). In fact, an old STEMI may manifest as a chronic, persistent ST elevation along with Q waves, and T waves may be inverted or upright, but not ample.14 A history of an old MI, old electrocardiograms, if available, and quick bedside echocardiography may allow the diagnosis. In the case of an old dyskinetic infarct, echocardiography shows a thin, bright (scarred), and possibly aneurysmal myocardium, whereas in acute STEMI, the myocardium is neither thin nor scarred yet. If the patient does not report a history of MI, if the T wave is ample (> 75% the size of QRS), or if the patient presents with atypical ongoing angina, presume it is acute STEMI.

 

 

EARLY REPOLARIZATION

Early repolarization is a normal variant of ST elevation that equals or exceeds 1 mm (measured at the J point). It is highly prevalent in people under age 40 and remains prevalent in middle-aged people.

Two distinct and sometimes coexistent forms of early repolarization have been described: (1) ST elevation in the anterior leads V1 to V3,16–19 and (2) ST elevation in the lateral leads (V4 to V6, I, aVL) or inferior leads.18–22 The prevalence of the first form—ie, ST elevation of 1 mm or more in any of the leads V1 through V3—is 60% to 90% in men  age 45 and younger, 20% to 40% in men over age 45, and about 10% in women of any age.16 Thus, this form of early repolarization is called “normal male pattern.”

Even early repolarization that involves the lateral or inferior leads is common, with a prevalence of about 15% in people ages 30 to 40 and about 5% to 10% in those 40 to 65.20–23 It is two to four times more prevalent in men and three times more prevalent in African Americans. It is also highly prevalent in athletes younger than 25 (about 30% to 40%).22

Figure 4. Early repolarization with ST-segment elevation is seen in the inferior leads and in the anterolateral leads V2 to V6. ST elevation is most prominent in lead V4 and lead II, with a concavely upward ST morphology and a notch at the J point (arrows and left magnified image). In half of early repolarization cases, the J point is smooth but well demarcated (right magnified image). Note the slight PR depression in leads II and V5. Slight PR depression may be seen in normal individuals and corresponds to the normal atrial repolarization.
Either way, early repolarization closely resembles the ST elevation of pericarditis and has the following features (Figure 4):

  • The ST segment is concave upward, and the J point is well demarcated and may be notched or slurred (Figure 1).
  • ST elevation is usually no more than 3 mm.
  • ST elevation may be limited to the anterior leads or, in many instances, may extend to the inferior or lateral leads. Early repolarization is very rarely limited to the limb leads, and involvement of some precordial leads is the rule.18,19 The ST segment is depressed in lead aVR in 50% of patients.18,19
  • Figure 5. Early repolarization with a normal variant T-wave inversion in a 33-year-old black man. The ST segment is elevated with a notched J point in leads V2 to V5
    The T wave is usually ample and may be more than 10 mm tall in the precordial leads in one-third of patients,17 but as opposed to the ample T wave of STEMI, it is not broad and remains smaller than the QRS complex. The ample T wave distinguishes early repolarization from pericarditis, and explains the low ST-T ratio in lead V6. In up to 10% of young black men, the T wave has a terminal inversion in leads V3 to V5, and occasionally in V1 and V2, mimicking infarction (Figure 5).24
  • The QRS complex tends to have prominent precordial voltage, in sharp contrast to STEMI, in which QRS shrinking occurs.3,17,22

The early repolarization pattern may be intermittent, may vary among serial electrocardiograms, may decrease with a rise in sympathetic tone, as observed during exercise, and may increase with a rise in vagal tone.18,19,25,26  Although it is usually a benign finding, the early repolarization pattern in leads other than V1 to V3 has been associated with an increased risk of sudden death, particularly when the ST elevation is horizontal-descending rather than upsloping and, possibly, when early repolarization involves the inferior leads with a J point that is notched or elevated 2 mm or more.20,22

PERICARDITIS

Figure 6. Diffuse ST-segment elevation in most leads, with ST depression in lead aVR and an isoelectric ST segment in V1. None of the STEMI features are present: ST elevation is concave upward, no reciprocal ST depression is seen except in lead aVR; the T wave is not wide, inverted, or ample (in relation to the QRS complex); and no Q wave is seen. Furthermore, ST elevation does not exceed 5 mm; ST and T heights are smaller than QRS height; and PR depression is present (circled areas). As opposed to early repolarization, the ratio of ST to T in leads V5 and V6 exceeds 25%. This is consistent with pericarditis, and the hospital course of this patient confirmed this diagnosis.
In pericarditis, ST elevation is concave upward and is widespread to more than one region without reciprocal ST depression, except for the frequent ST depression in leads aVR and V1 (64%)27; ST elevation is seldom greater than 4 to 5 mm (Figure 6).27,28 Since the subepicardial injury is diffuse in pericarditis, the axis of the ST segment follows the anatomic axis of the heart and is generally +45° in the frontal plane. Thus, ST depression is seen in leads aVR and V1; ST elevation is highest in leads II, V5, and V6 and is less in leads III and aVL, where the ST segment may occasionally be depressed.29

Transient PR depression greater than 1 mm is often seen, particularly in leads II, aVF, and V4 to V6, and represents atrial subepicardial injury. PR depression in those leads is always associated with PR elevation in lead aVR and sometimes V1. PR changes often coexist with ST changes but may be isolated and may precede ST changes.30 PR depression is characteristic of pericarditis but may be seen in early repolarization, where it is less marked than in pericarditis (< 0.8 mm) and implies early repolarization of the atrial tissue,31 and in MI, where it implies atrial infarction with atrial injury pattern.

Classically, it is said that in pericarditis, unlike in STEMI, the T wave does not invert until the ST elevation subsides. In reality, up to 40% of patients develop a notched or biphasic positive-negative T wave before full return of the ST segment to the baseline.27,32 And if T-wave inversion antedates pericarditis, concomitant ST elevation and T-wave inversion may be seen once pericarditis develops. However, the T wave inverts less deeply and less completely than in STEMI, and the corrected QT interval remains normal even when the T wave inverts.

Three criteria distinguish pericarditis from early repolarization (but not from STEMI):

  • PR depression greater than 1 mm
  • ST-segment depression in lead V1
  • A ratio of ST-segment height to T-wave height of at least 25% in lead V6, V5, V4, or I. This feature distinguishes pericarditis from early repolarization with a high sensitivity and specificity. In pericarditis, the T waves have normal or reduced amplitude, and the ST-T ratio is therefore high,33 whereas in early repolarization the T waves are tall, so the ST-T ratio is less than 25%.

Widespread ST elevation may be seen with both pericarditis and early repolarization. ST elevation limited to the anterior leads is more likely to be early repolarization than pericarditis.

LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

Figure 7. Supraventricular tachycardia with a typical left bundle branch block pattern in leads I and aVL. Concordant ST-segment elevation is seen in leads I and aVL, while concordant ST depression is seen in the inferior leads (arrows). The ST elevation in lead V2 is discordant but is disproportionately high in relation to the QRS (well above 25% of the QRS height). All these features are diagnostic of STEMI.
In left bundle branch block, a deep and wide S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3 and sometimes in the inferior leads, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex—ie, directed opposite to the QRS (Figures 7–9). The ST elevation is typically concave upward.8,34 Occasionally, ST elevation may be straight or convex, mimicking the dome of STEMI. In the lateral leads, the discordant ST segment is depressed, mimicking a reciprocal ST change.

The following findings imply MI:

  • Figure 8. Left bundle branch block with discordant ST-segment changes. However, the T wave is wide and fused with the ST segment in a domed morphology, and the T wave is larger than the QRS in leads V4, V5, and II (arrows). This implies the diagnosis of STEMI with hyperacute T waves. This patient had an occluded left anterior descending coronary artery.
    ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS complex. Moreover, since ST deviation is mandatory with left bundle branch block, a “normal-looking” ST segment implies ischemia.
  • Inverted T waves concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3). Across the precordial leads, T waves may transition from positive to negative one lead earlier or later than the QRS and ST transition. Therefore, even in the absence of ischemia, the T wave may be inverted in lead V3, in which the QRS is deeply negative and the ST is still elevated (negative T-wave concordance in one lead). Also, the T wave may be upright in leads V5, V6, and I where QRS is upright and the ST segment is depressed (positive T-wave concordance does not imply ischemia).
  • Figure 9. Left bundle branch block with abnormal T waves. Panels A and B show discordant ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3 but concordant T wave inversion (A) or biphasic T wave (B). This is consistent with an anterior injury pattern. Panel C shows concordant T-wave inversion in the inferior leads, consistent with inferior injury. Panel D shows a large concordant T wave in lead V6, larger than the QRS, consistent with injury.
    In addition to concordance, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. For example, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is larger than the QRS height implies ischemia. A discordant ST elevation greater than 5 mm has been suggested by Sgarbossa et al35 as a diagnostic feature of STEMI; however, this feature is seen in 10% of control patients with left bundle branch block and no STEMI, and it is thus poorly specific and also poorly sensitive, frequently missing STEMI.35–37 Smith et al36 have suggested that a discordant ST elevation of at least 25% of the S-wave depth is a far more sensitive and accurate feature but one that may still be found in up to 10% of control patients.36
 

 

LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY

In left ventricular hypertrophy, a deep S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex. Rarely, ST elevation may be straight or convex. The following findings imply MI:

  • ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS.
  • Inverted T waves that are concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3).
  • A discordant ST segment or a T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. In left ventricular hypertrophy, ST elevation is usually less than 2.5 mm in leads V1 to V3 and is rarely seen in the inferior leads, where it would be less than 1 mm.34 When ST elevation is seen in leads V1 to V3 in left ventricular hypertrophy, an ST magnitude of 25% or more of the total QRS voltage has a 91% specificity for STEMI.34

On another note, right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may lead to ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion, but not to ST elevation. Thus, ST elevation occurring with right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block implies STEMI. While only left bundle branch block poses a diagnostic challenge, both types of bundle branch block, if secondary to STEMI, represent equally high-risk categories.38

PREEXCITATION

Figure 10. At first glance, it seems there is ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads II, III, and aVF, with a wide Q wave. Moreover, there is a wide and tall R wave in lead V1 suggesting an associated posterior infarction. All this is consistent with acute inferoposterior STEMI. On further analysis, however, a slur is seen on the upslope of QRS in leads V1 to V6 (arrows), and the P wave is “riding” this slur. In the inferior leads, the P wave is riding the Q wave, which is in fact a negative delta wave. Thus, this electrocardiogram represents preexcitation. The ST deviations are secondary to the preexcitation and have an orientation opposite to the delta wave.
Preexcitation may be associated with negative delta waves that mimic Q waves, and with ST elevation in the leads where the negative delta waves are seen, ie, ST elevation discordant with the delta wave (Figure 10). The QRS morphology and the delta wave allow preexcitation to be distinguished from STEMI.

HYPERKALEMIA

Figure 11. There are ST-segment elevations in leads V1–V4, ST-segment depressions in the inferior leads, and peaked T waves in leads V3–V5. These T waves have a narrow base and seem to “pull” the ST segment, creating ST elevation in the anterior leads and ST depression in the inferior leads (arrows). This shape is consistent with hyperkalemia. In addition, the downsloping ST elevation seen in V1 and V2 is consistent with hyperkalemia (arrowhead). Occasionally, STEMI may have a similar ST-T shape. An rSR’ pattern is seen in V1–V2; this is consistent with STEMI but also with hyperkalemia, in which conduction blocks are common. The serum potassium level was 7.4 mmol/L (normal 3.5–5), and coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries.
The most common finding in hyperkalemia is a peaked, narrow-based T wave that is usually, but not necessarily, tall. ST elevation may be evident in leads V1 to V3 (Figure 11). In contrast with hyperkalemia, the T wave of STEMI is typically wide.

OTHER CAUSES OF ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy mimics all electrocardiographic features of anteroapical STEMI. ST elevation may extend to the inferior leads but cannot be isolated in the inferior leads.39 As in apical STEMI, reciprocal ST depression is uncommon. Within 24 to 48 hours, ST elevation evolves into deep anterior T-wave inversion and a prolonged QT interval. Transient Q waves may be seen.

Myocarditis

Myocarditis may have one of two electrocardiographic patterns: a pericarditis pattern, or a typical STEMI pattern with Q waves sometimes localized to one area.40

Atrial flutter waves

Figure 12. Atrial flutter that simulates ST-segment elevation. An “F” indicates the negative flutter wave; an asterisk indicates the upslope of the flutter wave that is superimposed on the ST segment, mimicking ST elevation.
Atrial flutter waves, particularly of 2:1 atrial flutter, may deform the ST segment so that it mimics an injury pattern on the electrocardiogram. Flutter waves may mimic ST elevation or ST depression (Figure 12).

Large pulmonary embolism

A large pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in the anterior leads or the inferior leads, or both, reflective of cor pulmonale. Less commonly, ST elevation in the anterior or inferior leads is seen. In fact, changes of both anterior and inferior ischemia should always suggest a pulmonary embolism.41,42

Brugada syndrome

Figure 13. Type 1 Brugada pattern in V1 and V1, with a downsloping ST-segment elevation that creates a pseudo-R’ wave (pseudo-right bundle branch block). The QRS does not have a right bundle branch block morphology in leads V5 and V6.
Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST elevation and a right bundle branch block or pseudo-right bundle branch block pattern in at least two of the leads V1 to V3. In pseudo-right bundle branch block, the QRS adopts an rSR morphology in the anterior leads but is normal in the lateral leads. Type 1 Brugada pattern, the pattern that is most specifically associated with sudden death, is characterized by a coved, downsloping ST elevation of 2 mm or more with T-wave inversion (Figure 13).43 The Brugada pattern can be transient, triggered by fever, cocaine, or class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Hyperkalemia, Brugada syndrome, and sometimes pulmonary embolism are characterized by an ST elevation that slopes downward (Figures 11 and 13), which contrasts with the upsloping, convex ST elevation of STEMI.

Figure 1.
When the ST segment is elevated on the electrocardiogram, our first concern is whether the patient is having an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, a number of other conditions can cause ST elevation, and to complicate matters, some of these can coexist with STEMI.

Nevertheless, careful attention to the ST-T and QRS-complex configurations often allows diagnosis of the cause of ST elevation (Figure 1, Table 1). This paper discusses the differential diagnosis of ST elevation.

MEASURED AT THE J POINT OR LATER

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 Some authors prefer measuring the magnitude of the ST deviation 40 to 80 msec after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment.2,3

ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

A diagnosis of STEMI that mandates emergency reperfusion requires ST elevation equaling or exceeding the following cut-points, in at least two contiguous leads (using the standardization of 1.0 mV = 10 mm)4,5:

  • 1 mm in all standard leads other than V2 and V3
  • 2.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men younger than age 40, 2 mm in leads V2 and V3 in men age 40 and older, and 1.5 mm in these leads in women
  • 0.5 mm in the posterior chest leads V7 to V9; ST elevation is attenuated in the posterior leads because of their greater distance from the heart, explaining the lower cut-point.6

While ST elevation that falls below these cut-points may be a normal variant, any ST elevation or depression (≥ 0.5 mm) may be abnormal and may necessitate further evaluation for ischemia, particularly when the clinical setting or the ST morphology suggests ischemia or when other signs of ischemia such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are also present on the electrocardiogram.

Conversely, ST elevation that exceeds these cut-points may not represent STEMI. In an analysis of patients with chest pain manifesting ST elevation, only 15% were eventually diagnosed with STEMI.7 In addition to size, careful attention to the morphology of the ST segment and the associated features is critical (Figure 1).

Other features of STEMI

Figure 2. Diffuse ST-segment elevation with ST-segment depression in lead aVR. This initially suggests pericarditis. PR depression in leads II, aVF, V5, and V6 further suggests pericarditis. But the presence of features of pericarditis does not necessarily rule out STEMI. The five STEMI features must be ruled out. In this case, the ST-segment morphology and the abnormally wide T wave are features of STEMI. The ST elevation has an upwardly convex shape with a wide and high T wave fused with the ST segment, typical of STEMI (leads V2–V4, arrows). Also, the size of the ST elevation (ie, > 5 mm in V2–V4 and larger than the QRS complex in V4, a feature called “tombstoning”) is more consistent with STEMI than with pericarditis. In this patient, the left anterior descending artery was found to be occluded on coronary arteriography.
In STEMI, the ST elevation is typically a convex or a straight oblique line, blending with a wide T wave to form a dome.8 But ST elevation may be concave in up to 40% of anterior STEMIs, especially in the early stage.3,9,10 The nonconcave morphology is highly specific but not sensitive for the diagnosis of anterior STEMI.3,8,9

Four other features characteristic of STEMI may be present (Figures 2 and 3):

  • Concomitant T-wave abnormalities (wide, ample, or inverted T waves)
  • Q waves
  • ST depression in the reciprocal leads. Reciprocal ST depression is seen in all inferior STEMIs and in 70% of anterior STEMIs.11,12 Diffuse ST elevation mimicking pericarditis may be seen with midvessel occlusion of a left anterior descending artery that wraps around the apex and supplies part of the inferior wall.
  • Figure 3. In a patient with lung cancer, sinus tachycardia is seen with diffuse ST-segment elevation, along with ST-segment depression in aVR. The QRS voltage is low, particularly when compared with the electrocardio-gram recorded a few days earlier (left lower panel). PR depression is seen in lead II. The combination of these findings may suggest pericarditis with a pericardial effusion. However, the ST-T morphology in lead V2, where the ST and T are blended to form one dome, is characteristic of STEMI (top arrow). Moreover, the ST elevation and T wave in leads V2–V4 are larger than the QRS, the QRS voltage is “shrinking” (arrowhead), and the R wave is pulled up by the ST segment (star); this is called “tombstoning.” All these features are characteristic of STEMI, wherein the R wave and the QRS complex shrink before forming a deep Q wave. In fact, an electrocardiogram recorded 1 hour later (right lower panel) shows a fully developed Q wave in lead V2 (bottom arrow).
    ST or T-wave amplitude may approximate or exceed the QRS amplitude in at least one lead.3,13,14 This finding is characteristic of STEMI, in which the QRS “shrinks” as the infarcted area becomes electrically neutral, whereas the ST-T segments become ample.3,13 In fact, early STEMI may be characterized by a small R wave that seems to be “pulled up” by the elevated ST segment. A small or absent R wave along with an ample, convex ST segment that fuses with the T wave and exceeds the height of the remaining R wave is called “tombstoning” (Figure 3). Tombstoning is most commonly seen with anterior infarction and implies more extensive myocardial damage and a worse prognosis than STEMI without tombstoning.15

Note that ST elevation may not be acute STEMI but an old STEMI with a chronically dysfunctional myocardium (dyskinetic or aneurysmal myocardium). In fact, an old STEMI may manifest as a chronic, persistent ST elevation along with Q waves, and T waves may be inverted or upright, but not ample.14 A history of an old MI, old electrocardiograms, if available, and quick bedside echocardiography may allow the diagnosis. In the case of an old dyskinetic infarct, echocardiography shows a thin, bright (scarred), and possibly aneurysmal myocardium, whereas in acute STEMI, the myocardium is neither thin nor scarred yet. If the patient does not report a history of MI, if the T wave is ample (> 75% the size of QRS), or if the patient presents with atypical ongoing angina, presume it is acute STEMI.

 

 

EARLY REPOLARIZATION

Early repolarization is a normal variant of ST elevation that equals or exceeds 1 mm (measured at the J point). It is highly prevalent in people under age 40 and remains prevalent in middle-aged people.

Two distinct and sometimes coexistent forms of early repolarization have been described: (1) ST elevation in the anterior leads V1 to V3,16–19 and (2) ST elevation in the lateral leads (V4 to V6, I, aVL) or inferior leads.18–22 The prevalence of the first form—ie, ST elevation of 1 mm or more in any of the leads V1 through V3—is 60% to 90% in men  age 45 and younger, 20% to 40% in men over age 45, and about 10% in women of any age.16 Thus, this form of early repolarization is called “normal male pattern.”

Even early repolarization that involves the lateral or inferior leads is common, with a prevalence of about 15% in people ages 30 to 40 and about 5% to 10% in those 40 to 65.20–23 It is two to four times more prevalent in men and three times more prevalent in African Americans. It is also highly prevalent in athletes younger than 25 (about 30% to 40%).22

Figure 4. Early repolarization with ST-segment elevation is seen in the inferior leads and in the anterolateral leads V2 to V6. ST elevation is most prominent in lead V4 and lead II, with a concavely upward ST morphology and a notch at the J point (arrows and left magnified image). In half of early repolarization cases, the J point is smooth but well demarcated (right magnified image). Note the slight PR depression in leads II and V5. Slight PR depression may be seen in normal individuals and corresponds to the normal atrial repolarization.
Either way, early repolarization closely resembles the ST elevation of pericarditis and has the following features (Figure 4):

  • The ST segment is concave upward, and the J point is well demarcated and may be notched or slurred (Figure 1).
  • ST elevation is usually no more than 3 mm.
  • ST elevation may be limited to the anterior leads or, in many instances, may extend to the inferior or lateral leads. Early repolarization is very rarely limited to the limb leads, and involvement of some precordial leads is the rule.18,19 The ST segment is depressed in lead aVR in 50% of patients.18,19
  • Figure 5. Early repolarization with a normal variant T-wave inversion in a 33-year-old black man. The ST segment is elevated with a notched J point in leads V2 to V5
    The T wave is usually ample and may be more than 10 mm tall in the precordial leads in one-third of patients,17 but as opposed to the ample T wave of STEMI, it is not broad and remains smaller than the QRS complex. The ample T wave distinguishes early repolarization from pericarditis, and explains the low ST-T ratio in lead V6. In up to 10% of young black men, the T wave has a terminal inversion in leads V3 to V5, and occasionally in V1 and V2, mimicking infarction (Figure 5).24
  • The QRS complex tends to have prominent precordial voltage, in sharp contrast to STEMI, in which QRS shrinking occurs.3,17,22

The early repolarization pattern may be intermittent, may vary among serial electrocardiograms, may decrease with a rise in sympathetic tone, as observed during exercise, and may increase with a rise in vagal tone.18,19,25,26  Although it is usually a benign finding, the early repolarization pattern in leads other than V1 to V3 has been associated with an increased risk of sudden death, particularly when the ST elevation is horizontal-descending rather than upsloping and, possibly, when early repolarization involves the inferior leads with a J point that is notched or elevated 2 mm or more.20,22

PERICARDITIS

Figure 6. Diffuse ST-segment elevation in most leads, with ST depression in lead aVR and an isoelectric ST segment in V1. None of the STEMI features are present: ST elevation is concave upward, no reciprocal ST depression is seen except in lead aVR; the T wave is not wide, inverted, or ample (in relation to the QRS complex); and no Q wave is seen. Furthermore, ST elevation does not exceed 5 mm; ST and T heights are smaller than QRS height; and PR depression is present (circled areas). As opposed to early repolarization, the ratio of ST to T in leads V5 and V6 exceeds 25%. This is consistent with pericarditis, and the hospital course of this patient confirmed this diagnosis.
In pericarditis, ST elevation is concave upward and is widespread to more than one region without reciprocal ST depression, except for the frequent ST depression in leads aVR and V1 (64%)27; ST elevation is seldom greater than 4 to 5 mm (Figure 6).27,28 Since the subepicardial injury is diffuse in pericarditis, the axis of the ST segment follows the anatomic axis of the heart and is generally +45° in the frontal plane. Thus, ST depression is seen in leads aVR and V1; ST elevation is highest in leads II, V5, and V6 and is less in leads III and aVL, where the ST segment may occasionally be depressed.29

Transient PR depression greater than 1 mm is often seen, particularly in leads II, aVF, and V4 to V6, and represents atrial subepicardial injury. PR depression in those leads is always associated with PR elevation in lead aVR and sometimes V1. PR changes often coexist with ST changes but may be isolated and may precede ST changes.30 PR depression is characteristic of pericarditis but may be seen in early repolarization, where it is less marked than in pericarditis (< 0.8 mm) and implies early repolarization of the atrial tissue,31 and in MI, where it implies atrial infarction with atrial injury pattern.

Classically, it is said that in pericarditis, unlike in STEMI, the T wave does not invert until the ST elevation subsides. In reality, up to 40% of patients develop a notched or biphasic positive-negative T wave before full return of the ST segment to the baseline.27,32 And if T-wave inversion antedates pericarditis, concomitant ST elevation and T-wave inversion may be seen once pericarditis develops. However, the T wave inverts less deeply and less completely than in STEMI, and the corrected QT interval remains normal even when the T wave inverts.

Three criteria distinguish pericarditis from early repolarization (but not from STEMI):

  • PR depression greater than 1 mm
  • ST-segment depression in lead V1
  • A ratio of ST-segment height to T-wave height of at least 25% in lead V6, V5, V4, or I. This feature distinguishes pericarditis from early repolarization with a high sensitivity and specificity. In pericarditis, the T waves have normal or reduced amplitude, and the ST-T ratio is therefore high,33 whereas in early repolarization the T waves are tall, so the ST-T ratio is less than 25%.

Widespread ST elevation may be seen with both pericarditis and early repolarization. ST elevation limited to the anterior leads is more likely to be early repolarization than pericarditis.

LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

Figure 7. Supraventricular tachycardia with a typical left bundle branch block pattern in leads I and aVL. Concordant ST-segment elevation is seen in leads I and aVL, while concordant ST depression is seen in the inferior leads (arrows). The ST elevation in lead V2 is discordant but is disproportionately high in relation to the QRS (well above 25% of the QRS height). All these features are diagnostic of STEMI.
In left bundle branch block, a deep and wide S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3 and sometimes in the inferior leads, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex—ie, directed opposite to the QRS (Figures 7–9). The ST elevation is typically concave upward.8,34 Occasionally, ST elevation may be straight or convex, mimicking the dome of STEMI. In the lateral leads, the discordant ST segment is depressed, mimicking a reciprocal ST change.

The following findings imply MI:

  • Figure 8. Left bundle branch block with discordant ST-segment changes. However, the T wave is wide and fused with the ST segment in a domed morphology, and the T wave is larger than the QRS in leads V4, V5, and II (arrows). This implies the diagnosis of STEMI with hyperacute T waves. This patient had an occluded left anterior descending coronary artery.
    ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS complex. Moreover, since ST deviation is mandatory with left bundle branch block, a “normal-looking” ST segment implies ischemia.
  • Inverted T waves concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3). Across the precordial leads, T waves may transition from positive to negative one lead earlier or later than the QRS and ST transition. Therefore, even in the absence of ischemia, the T wave may be inverted in lead V3, in which the QRS is deeply negative and the ST is still elevated (negative T-wave concordance in one lead). Also, the T wave may be upright in leads V5, V6, and I where QRS is upright and the ST segment is depressed (positive T-wave concordance does not imply ischemia).
  • Figure 9. Left bundle branch block with abnormal T waves. Panels A and B show discordant ST-segment elevation in V1 to V3 but concordant T wave inversion (A) or biphasic T wave (B). This is consistent with an anterior injury pattern. Panel C shows concordant T-wave inversion in the inferior leads, consistent with inferior injury. Panel D shows a large concordant T wave in lead V6, larger than the QRS, consistent with injury.
    In addition to concordance, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. For example, a discordant ST segment or T wave that is larger than the QRS height implies ischemia. A discordant ST elevation greater than 5 mm has been suggested by Sgarbossa et al35 as a diagnostic feature of STEMI; however, this feature is seen in 10% of control patients with left bundle branch block and no STEMI, and it is thus poorly specific and also poorly sensitive, frequently missing STEMI.35–37 Smith et al36 have suggested that a discordant ST elevation of at least 25% of the S-wave depth is a far more sensitive and accurate feature but one that may still be found in up to 10% of control patients.36
 

 

LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY

In left ventricular hypertrophy, a deep S wave is seen in leads V1 to V3, with ST elevation and T waves that are discordant with the QRS complex. Rarely, ST elevation may be straight or convex. The following findings imply MI:

  • ST elevation or depression that is concordant with the QRS.
  • Inverted T waves that are concordant with the QRS in more than one lead, or biphasic T waves in more than one lead (eg, V1 to V3).
  • A discordant ST segment or a T wave that is very large may imply ischemia. In left ventricular hypertrophy, ST elevation is usually less than 2.5 mm in leads V1 to V3 and is rarely seen in the inferior leads, where it would be less than 1 mm.34 When ST elevation is seen in leads V1 to V3 in left ventricular hypertrophy, an ST magnitude of 25% or more of the total QRS voltage has a 91% specificity for STEMI.34

On another note, right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may lead to ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion, but not to ST elevation. Thus, ST elevation occurring with right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block implies STEMI. While only left bundle branch block poses a diagnostic challenge, both types of bundle branch block, if secondary to STEMI, represent equally high-risk categories.38

PREEXCITATION

Figure 10. At first glance, it seems there is ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads II, III, and aVF, with a wide Q wave. Moreover, there is a wide and tall R wave in lead V1 suggesting an associated posterior infarction. All this is consistent with acute inferoposterior STEMI. On further analysis, however, a slur is seen on the upslope of QRS in leads V1 to V6 (arrows), and the P wave is “riding” this slur. In the inferior leads, the P wave is riding the Q wave, which is in fact a negative delta wave. Thus, this electrocardiogram represents preexcitation. The ST deviations are secondary to the preexcitation and have an orientation opposite to the delta wave.
Preexcitation may be associated with negative delta waves that mimic Q waves, and with ST elevation in the leads where the negative delta waves are seen, ie, ST elevation discordant with the delta wave (Figure 10). The QRS morphology and the delta wave allow preexcitation to be distinguished from STEMI.

HYPERKALEMIA

Figure 11. There are ST-segment elevations in leads V1–V4, ST-segment depressions in the inferior leads, and peaked T waves in leads V3–V5. These T waves have a narrow base and seem to “pull” the ST segment, creating ST elevation in the anterior leads and ST depression in the inferior leads (arrows). This shape is consistent with hyperkalemia. In addition, the downsloping ST elevation seen in V1 and V2 is consistent with hyperkalemia (arrowhead). Occasionally, STEMI may have a similar ST-T shape. An rSR’ pattern is seen in V1–V2; this is consistent with STEMI but also with hyperkalemia, in which conduction blocks are common. The serum potassium level was 7.4 mmol/L (normal 3.5–5), and coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries.
The most common finding in hyperkalemia is a peaked, narrow-based T wave that is usually, but not necessarily, tall. ST elevation may be evident in leads V1 to V3 (Figure 11). In contrast with hyperkalemia, the T wave of STEMI is typically wide.

OTHER CAUSES OF ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy mimics all electrocardiographic features of anteroapical STEMI. ST elevation may extend to the inferior leads but cannot be isolated in the inferior leads.39 As in apical STEMI, reciprocal ST depression is uncommon. Within 24 to 48 hours, ST elevation evolves into deep anterior T-wave inversion and a prolonged QT interval. Transient Q waves may be seen.

Myocarditis

Myocarditis may have one of two electrocardiographic patterns: a pericarditis pattern, or a typical STEMI pattern with Q waves sometimes localized to one area.40

Atrial flutter waves

Figure 12. Atrial flutter that simulates ST-segment elevation. An “F” indicates the negative flutter wave; an asterisk indicates the upslope of the flutter wave that is superimposed on the ST segment, mimicking ST elevation.
Atrial flutter waves, particularly of 2:1 atrial flutter, may deform the ST segment so that it mimics an injury pattern on the electrocardiogram. Flutter waves may mimic ST elevation or ST depression (Figure 12).

Large pulmonary embolism

A large pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in the anterior leads or the inferior leads, or both, reflective of cor pulmonale. Less commonly, ST elevation in the anterior or inferior leads is seen. In fact, changes of both anterior and inferior ischemia should always suggest a pulmonary embolism.41,42

Brugada syndrome

Figure 13. Type 1 Brugada pattern in V1 and V1, with a downsloping ST-segment elevation that creates a pseudo-R’ wave (pseudo-right bundle branch block). The QRS does not have a right bundle branch block morphology in leads V5 and V6.
Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST elevation and a right bundle branch block or pseudo-right bundle branch block pattern in at least two of the leads V1 to V3. In pseudo-right bundle branch block, the QRS adopts an rSR morphology in the anterior leads but is normal in the lateral leads. Type 1 Brugada pattern, the pattern that is most specifically associated with sudden death, is characterized by a coved, downsloping ST elevation of 2 mm or more with T-wave inversion (Figure 13).43 The Brugada pattern can be transient, triggered by fever, cocaine, or class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Hyperkalemia, Brugada syndrome, and sometimes pulmonary embolism are characterized by an ST elevation that slopes downward (Figures 11 and 13), which contrasts with the upsloping, convex ST elevation of STEMI.

References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST-segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982–991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2001:194–207.
  3. Smith SW, Khalil A, Henry TD, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:45–56.e2.
  4. American College of Emergency Physicians; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:e78–e140.
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012; 126:2020–2035.
  6. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506–511.
  7. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Martin ML, Beagle C, Aufderheide TP. Cause of ST-segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:25–28.
  8. Brady WJ, Syverud SA, Beagle C, et al. Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:961–967.
  9. Smith SW. Upwardly concave ST-segment morphology is common in acute left anterior descending coronary occlusion. J Emerg Med 2006; 31:69–77.
  10. Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, et al. Value of ST-segment elevation pattern in predicting infarct size and left ventricular function at discharge in patients with reperfused acute anterior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1999; 137:522–527.
  11. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Mager A, Strasberg B, Rechavia E. ST segment depression in a VL: a sensitive marker for acute inferior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1993; 14:4–7.
  12. Engelen DJ, Gorgels AP, Cheriex EC, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in localizing the occlusion site in the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:389–395.
  13. Collins MS, Carter JE, Dougherty JM, Majercik SM, Hodsden JE, Logue EE. Hyperacute T-wave criteria using computer ECG analysis. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:114–120.
  14. Smith SW. T/QRS ratio best distinguishes ventricular aneurysm from anterior myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:279–287.
  15. Balci B. Tombstoning ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009; 5:273–278.
  16. Surawicz B, Parikh SR. Prevalence of male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in the normal ECG of males and females from childhood to old age. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1870–1876.
  17. Klatsky AL, Oehm R, Cooper RA, Udaltsova N, Armstrong MA. The early repolarization normal variant electrocardiogram: correlates and consequences. Am J Med 2003; 115:171–177.
  18. Mehta M, Jain AC, Mehta A. Early repolarization. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22:59–65.
  19. Mehta MC, Jain AC. Early repolarization on scalar electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sci 1995; 309:305–311.
  20. Rollin A, Maury P, Bongard V, et al. Prevalence, prognosis, and identification of the malignant form of early repolarization pattern in a population-based study. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1302–1308.
  21. Tikkanen JT, Anttonen O, Junttila MJ, et al. Long-term outcome associated with early repolarization on electrocardiography. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2529–2537.
  22. Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Anttonen O, et al. Early repolarization: electrocardiographic phenotypes associated with favorable long-term outcome. Circulation 2011; 123:2666–2673.
  23. Noseworthy PA, Tikkanen JT, Porthan K, et al. The early repolarization pattern in the general population: clinical correlates and heritability. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2284–2289.
  24. Wasserburger RH. Observations on the juvenile pattern of adult negro males. Am J Med 1955; 18:428–437.
  25. Kralios FA, Martin L, Burgess MJ, Millar K. Local ventricular repolarization changes due to sympathetic nerve-branch stimulation. Am J Physiol 1975; 228:1621–1626.
  26. Spratt KA, Borans SM, Michelson EL. Early repolarization: normalization of the electrocardiogram with exercise as a clinically useful diagnostic feature. J Invasive Cardiol 1995; 7:238–242.
  27. Surawicz B, Lasseter KC. Electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26:471–474.
  28. Hull E. The electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1961; 7:21–32.
  29. Spodick DH. Diagnostic electrocardiographic sequences in acute pericarditis. Significance of PR segment and PR vector changes. Circulation 1973; 48:575–580.
  30. Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA 2003; 289:1150–1153.
  31. Charles MA, Bensinger TA, Glasser SP. Atrial injury current in pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1973; 131:657–662.
  32. Noth PH, Barnes HR. Electrocardiographic changes associated with pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1940; 65:291–320.
  33. Ginzton LE, Laks MM. The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: new electrocardiographic criteria. Circulation 1982; 65:1004–1009.
  34. Armstrong EJ, Kulkarni AR, Bhave PD, et al. Electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:977–983.
  35. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:481–487.
  36. Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, Dvorak DM, Pearce LA. Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:766–776.
  37. Madias JE, Sinha A, Agarwal H, Ashtiani R. ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3 in patients with LBBB. J Electrocardiol 2001; 34:87–88.
  38. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Topol EJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:105–110.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858–865.
  40. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876–890.
  41. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298–303.
  42. Glancy DL, Mikdadi GM. Syncope in a 67-year-old man. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2005; 18:74–75.
  43. Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, et al; Study Group on the Molecular Basis of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome: consensus report. Circulation 2002; 106:2514–2519.
References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST-segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982–991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2001:194–207.
  3. Smith SW, Khalil A, Henry TD, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:45–56.e2.
  4. American College of Emergency Physicians; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:e78–e140.
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012; 126:2020–2035.
  6. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506–511.
  7. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Martin ML, Beagle C, Aufderheide TP. Cause of ST-segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:25–28.
  8. Brady WJ, Syverud SA, Beagle C, et al. Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:961–967.
  9. Smith SW. Upwardly concave ST-segment morphology is common in acute left anterior descending coronary occlusion. J Emerg Med 2006; 31:69–77.
  10. Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, et al. Value of ST-segment elevation pattern in predicting infarct size and left ventricular function at discharge in patients with reperfused acute anterior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1999; 137:522–527.
  11. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Mager A, Strasberg B, Rechavia E. ST segment depression in a VL: a sensitive marker for acute inferior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1993; 14:4–7.
  12. Engelen DJ, Gorgels AP, Cheriex EC, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in localizing the occlusion site in the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:389–395.
  13. Collins MS, Carter JE, Dougherty JM, Majercik SM, Hodsden JE, Logue EE. Hyperacute T-wave criteria using computer ECG analysis. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:114–120.
  14. Smith SW. T/QRS ratio best distinguishes ventricular aneurysm from anterior myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:279–287.
  15. Balci B. Tombstoning ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009; 5:273–278.
  16. Surawicz B, Parikh SR. Prevalence of male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in the normal ECG of males and females from childhood to old age. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1870–1876.
  17. Klatsky AL, Oehm R, Cooper RA, Udaltsova N, Armstrong MA. The early repolarization normal variant electrocardiogram: correlates and consequences. Am J Med 2003; 115:171–177.
  18. Mehta M, Jain AC, Mehta A. Early repolarization. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22:59–65.
  19. Mehta MC, Jain AC. Early repolarization on scalar electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sci 1995; 309:305–311.
  20. Rollin A, Maury P, Bongard V, et al. Prevalence, prognosis, and identification of the malignant form of early repolarization pattern in a population-based study. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1302–1308.
  21. Tikkanen JT, Anttonen O, Junttila MJ, et al. Long-term outcome associated with early repolarization on electrocardiography. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2529–2537.
  22. Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Anttonen O, et al. Early repolarization: electrocardiographic phenotypes associated with favorable long-term outcome. Circulation 2011; 123:2666–2673.
  23. Noseworthy PA, Tikkanen JT, Porthan K, et al. The early repolarization pattern in the general population: clinical correlates and heritability. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2284–2289.
  24. Wasserburger RH. Observations on the juvenile pattern of adult negro males. Am J Med 1955; 18:428–437.
  25. Kralios FA, Martin L, Burgess MJ, Millar K. Local ventricular repolarization changes due to sympathetic nerve-branch stimulation. Am J Physiol 1975; 228:1621–1626.
  26. Spratt KA, Borans SM, Michelson EL. Early repolarization: normalization of the electrocardiogram with exercise as a clinically useful diagnostic feature. J Invasive Cardiol 1995; 7:238–242.
  27. Surawicz B, Lasseter KC. Electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26:471–474.
  28. Hull E. The electrocardiogram in pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1961; 7:21–32.
  29. Spodick DH. Diagnostic electrocardiographic sequences in acute pericarditis. Significance of PR segment and PR vector changes. Circulation 1973; 48:575–580.
  30. Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA 2003; 289:1150–1153.
  31. Charles MA, Bensinger TA, Glasser SP. Atrial injury current in pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1973; 131:657–662.
  32. Noth PH, Barnes HR. Electrocardiographic changes associated with pericarditis. Arch Intern Med 1940; 65:291–320.
  33. Ginzton LE, Laks MM. The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: new electrocardiographic criteria. Circulation 1982; 65:1004–1009.
  34. Armstrong EJ, Kulkarni AR, Bhave PD, et al. Electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:977–983.
  35. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:481–487.
  36. Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, Dvorak DM, Pearce LA. Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:766–776.
  37. Madias JE, Sinha A, Agarwal H, Ashtiani R. ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3 in patients with LBBB. J Electrocardiol 2001; 34:87–88.
  38. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Topol EJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:105–110.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858–865.
  40. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876–890.
  41. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298–303.
  42. Glancy DL, Mikdadi GM. Syncope in a 67-year-old man. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2005; 18:74–75.
  43. Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, et al; Study Group on the Molecular Basis of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome: consensus report. Circulation 2002; 106:2514–2519.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 82(6)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 82(6)
Page Number
373-384
Page Number
373-384
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
ST-segment elevation: Differential diagnosis, caveats
Display Headline
ST-segment elevation: Differential diagnosis, caveats
Legacy Keywords
ST, ST segment, ST segment elevation, ST elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, early repolarization, pericarditis, left bundle branch block, hyperkalemia, Elias Hanna, David Glancy
Legacy Keywords
ST, ST segment, ST segment elevation, ST elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, early repolarization, pericarditis, left bundle branch block, hyperkalemia, Elias Hanna, David Glancy
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Features of STEMI: (1) ST elevation that is straight or convex upward and blends with T to form a dome; (2) wide upright T or inverted T waves; (3) Q waves; (4) ST elevation or T waves that may approximate or exceed QRS height; and (5) reciprocal ST depression.
  • Features of early repolarization include a notched J point and ST elevation not exceeding 3 mm.
  • Features of pericarditis include PR depression greater than 1 mm and ST elevation less than 5 mm.
  • Features of left bundle branch block, left ventricular hypertrophy, and preexcitation: both ST and T are discordant to QRS; ST elevation is less than 25% of QRS height (and less than 2.5 mm in left ventricular hypertrophy); and delta waves, short PR, and pseudo-Q waves are seen in preexcitation.
  • Features of hyperkalemia include narrow-based, peaked T waves “pulling” the ST segment.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion: Classification, differential diagnosis, and caveats

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 06/12/2018 - 08:35
Display Headline
ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion: Classification, differential diagnosis, and caveats

Depression of the ST segment and inversion of the T wave are common electrocardiographic abnormalities. Knowing the various ischemic and nonischemic morphologic features is critical for a timely diagnosis of high-risk myocardial ischemia and electrolyte- or drug-related abnormalities. Moreover, it is important to recognize that true posterior infarction or subtle ST-segment elevation infarction may masquerade as ST-segment depression ischemia, and that pulmonary embolism may masquerade as anterior ischemia. These common electrocardiographic abnormalities are summarized in Table 1.

THE ST SEGMENT AND THE T WAVE: A PRIMER

Abnormalities of the ST segment and the T wave represent abnormalities of ventricular repolarization.

The ST segment corresponds to the plateau phase of ventricular repolarization (phase 2 of the action potential), while the T wave corresponds to the phase of rapid ventricular repolarization (phase 3). ST-segment or T-wave changes may be secondary to abnormalities of depolarization, ie, pre-excitation or abnormalities of QRS voltage or duration.

On the other hand, ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities may be unrelated to any QRS abnormality, in which case they are called primary repolarization abnormalities. These are caused by ischemia, pericarditis, myocarditis, drugs (digoxin, antiarrhythmic drugs), and electrolyte abnormalities, particularly potassium abnormalities.

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 But some prefer to measure the magnitude of the ST-segment deviation 40 to 80 ms after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment; at the very onset of repolarization, small differences in membrane potential may normally be seen and may cause deviation of the J point and of the early portion of the ST segment.2

Although a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that mandates emergency reperfusion therapy requires ST-segment elevation greater than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads,3 any ST-segment depression or elevation (≥ 0.5 mm, using the usual standard of 1.0 mV = 10 mm) may be abnormal, particularly when the clinical context or the shape of the ST segment suggests ischemia, or when other ischemic signs such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are concomitantly present. On the other hand, ST-segment depression of up to 0.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 and 1 mm in the other leads may be normal.1

In adults, the T wave normally is inverted in lead aVR; is upright or inverted in leads aVL, III, and V1; and is upright in leads I, II, aVF, and V2 through V6. The T wave is considered inverted when it is deeper than 1 mm; it is considered flat when its peak amplitude is between 1.0 mm and −1.0 mm.1

As we will discuss, certain features allow the various causes of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities to be distinguished from one another.

SECONDARY ST-SEGMENT AND T-WAVE ABNORMALITIES

Modified with permission from Hanna EB, Quintal R, Jain N. Cardiology: Handbook for Clinicians. Arlington, VA: Scrubhill Press; 2009:328–354.
Figure 1. ST-segment and T-wave morphologies in cases of secondary abnormalities (A) and ischemic abnormalities (B–E).
In secondary ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities, QRS criteria for left or right ventricular hypertrophy or left or right bundle branch block or pre-excitation are usually present, and the ST segment and T wave have all of the following morphologic features (Figure 1A):

  • The ST segment and T wave are directed opposite to the QRS: this is called discordance between the QRS complex and the ST-T abnormalities. In the case of right bundle branch block, the ST and T are directed opposite to the terminal portion of the QRS, ie, the part of the QRS deformed by the conduction abnormality.
  • The ST segment and T wave are both abnormal and deviate in the same direction, ie, the ST segment is down-sloping and the T wave is inverted in leads with an upright QRS complex, which gives the ST-T complex a “reverse checkmark” asymmetric morphology.
  • The ST and T abnormalities are not dynamic, ie, they do not change in the course of several hours to several days.

Figure 2. Example of left ventricular hypertrophy with typical secondary ST-T abnormalities in leads I, II, aVL, V4, V5, and V6. The QRS complex is upright in these leads while the ST segment and T wave are directed in the opposite direction, ie, the QRS and the ST-T complexes are discordant.

Thus, in cases of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, since the QRS complex is upright in the left lateral leads I, aVL, V5, and V6, the ST segment is characteristically depressed and the T wave is inverted in these leads (Figure 2). In cases of right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block, T waves are characteristically inverted in the right precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.

Left bundle branch block is always associated with secondary ST-T abnormalities, the absence of which suggests associated ischemia. Left and right ventricular hypertrophy, on the other hand, are not always associated with ST-T abnormalities, but when these are present, they correlate with more severe hypertrophy or ventricular systolic dysfunction,4 and have been called strain pattern. In addition, while these morphologic features are consistent with secondary abnormalities, they do not rule out ischemia in a patient with angina.

Some exceptions to these typical morphologic features:

  • Right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may be associated with isolated T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression in precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy may be associated with symmetric T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression or with a horizontally depressed ST segment. This may be the case in up to one-third of ST-T abnormalities secondary to left ventricular hypertrophy and is seen in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly the apical variant, in leads V3 through V6.5
 

 

ISCHEMIC ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION, T-WAVE INVERSION, OR BOTH

ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is consistent with ischemia if any of the following is true:

  • The ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is directed in the same direction as the QRS complex: this is called concordance between the QRS complex and the ST or T abnormality (Figure 1B).
  • The ST segment is depressed but the T wave is upright (Figure 1C).
  • The T wave has a positive-negative biphasic pattern (Figure 1D).
  • The T wave is symmetrically inverted and has a pointed configuration, while the ST segment is not deviated or is upwardly bowed (coved) or horizontally depressed (Figure 1E).
  • The magnitude of ST-segment depression progresses or regresses on serial tracings, or ST-segment depression progresses to T-wave abnormality during ischemia-free intervals (dynamic ST-segment depression).

Figure 3. Electrocardiogram of a patient with angina at rest and elevated cardiac biomarkers. ST-segment depression in nine leads with elevation in leads aVR and V1 suggested subendocardial ischemia related to three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. He had severe three-vessel disease on coronary arteriography.

Unlike ST-segment elevation, ST-segment depression does not localize ischemia.6 However, the extent and the magnitude of ST-segment depression correlate with the extent and the severity of ischemia. In fact, ST-segment depression in eight or more leads, combined with ST-segment elevation in leads aVR and V1 and occurring during ischemic pain, is associated with a 75% predictive accuracy for left main coronary artery or three-vessel disease (Figure 3).7,8 This finding may also be seen in cases of tight proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.9

Wellens syndrome

Figure 4. (A) Wellens-type biphasic T wave in leads V2 and V3 (arrows) and T-wave inversion in leads V4 and V5. (B) Wellens-type deep T-wave inversion in leads V2 to V4. Each patient had a 90% proximal left anterior descending stenosis at coronary arteriography.
Either the positive-negative biphasic T waves of the type shown in Figure 1D or the deeply inverted (≥ 5 mm) T waves that often follow them, when occurring in the precordial leads V2 and V3, with or without similar changes in V1, V4, and V5, are nearly pathognomonic of very recent severe ischemia or injury in the distribution of the left anterior descending artery and characterize what is known as Wellens syndrome (Figure 4).10–13

Wellens and his colleagues showed that 75% of patients who developed these T-wave abnormalities and who were treated medically without angiographic investigation went on to develop extensive anterior wall myocardial infarction within a mean of 8.5 days.10

In a later investigation of 1,260 patients presenting with unstable angina, 180 patients (14%) had this characteristic T-wave pattern.11 All of the latter patients had stenosis of 50% or more in the proximal left anterior descending artery, and 18% had total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery.

Thus, although medical management may provide symptomatic improvement at first, early coronary angiography and revascularization should be strongly considered in anyone with Wellens syndrome because it usually predicts impending anterior myocardial infarction.

Wellens syndrome is characterized by two patterns of T-wave changes. In 75% of cases, T waves are deeply (≥ 5 mm) and symmetrically inverted in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1E, 4B). In 25% of cases, the T wave has a characteristic positive-negative biphasic morphology in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1D, 4A).10 In both patterns, the ST segment is isoelectric or minimally elevated (< 1 mm) with a straight or convex morphology, the down-slope of the T wave is sharp, and the QT interval is often prolonged. These abnormalities are characteristically seen hours to days after the ischemic chest pain resolves. In fact, the ischemic episode is usually associated with transient ST-segment elevation or depression that progresses to the T-wave abnormality after the pain subsides.11

In Wellens’ original description, only 12% of patients had increases in their creatine kinase levels, and these were small. Therefore, the electrocardiogram may be the only indication of an impending large anterior infarction in a chest-pain-free patient.12

T waves that are symmetrically but less deeply inverted than Wellens-type T waves may still represent ischemia. However, this finding is less specific for ischemia and is associated with better outcomes than Wellens syndrome or ST-segment deviation, particularly when the T wave is less than 3 mm deep.14 In fact, one prospective cohort study found that isolated mild T-wave inversion in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome is associated with a favorable long-term outcome, similar to that in patients with no electrocardiographic changes.15

FREQUENTLY MISSED DIAGNOSES MANIFESTING AS ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION OR T-WAVE INVERSION

True posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

When accompanied by inferior STEMI, posterior infarction is easily recognized, but it can be difficult to diagnose when it occurs alone, the so-called true posterior STEMI.

Figure 5. (A) ST-segment depression in the precordial leads V1–V4, with a maximal depression in lead V3, in a patient with severe ongoing chest pain for the preceding 3 hours. This suggests a posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. There is also a subtle ST-segment elevation in lead III, which further alludes to the diagnosis of inferoposterior infarction. Emergency coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded mid-left circumflex coronary artery. (B) The ST segment is depressed in leads V1 through V6 and leads II, III, and aVF, with a maximal depression in leads V2 and V3. In addition, tall R waves are seen in leads V1 and V2 and Q waves are seen in the lateral leads I and aVL accompanied by ST elevation in aVL. In a patient with severe persistent chest pain, this suggests a posterolateral infarct. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded second obtuse marginal branch.
ST-segment depression that is most prominent in leads V1 through V3 often indicates posterior STEMI rather than non–ST-segment elevation ischemia and indicates the need for emergency revascularization. In fact, in the setting of posterior infarction, leads V1, V2, and V3 predominate as the areas of maximum depression, whereas greater ST-segment depression in the lateral precordial leads (V4, V5, and V6) or inferior leads (II, III, and aVF) is more indicative of nonocclusive and nonregional subendocardial ischemia (Figure 5).8,16–18

In most cases of posterior infarction, the posterior chest leads V7, V8, and V9 reveal ST-segment elevation.19 One study found that ST-segment depression in the anterior precordial leads was as sensitive as ST-segment elevation in leads V7 through V9 in identifying posterior myocardial infarction (sensitivity 80%),20 while other studies found that ST-segment deviation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography has a lower sensitivity (about 60%) in identifying posterior infarction.18,21

Tall or wide (≥ 0.04-s) R waves in leads V1 or V2, particularly when associated with upright T waves, suggest posterior infarction and may further corroborate this diagnosis, but this finding may take up to 24 hours to manifest and is seen in only about 50% of patients with posterior infarction.21

Studies have shown that ST-segment elevation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography is found in fewer than 50% of patients with acute left circumflex occlusion and inferoposterior infarction,18 yet these are cases of “missed” STEMI that indeed benefit from emergency angiography and reperfusion. In addition, studies of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome consistently identify patients who have epicardial vessel occlusion (about 15%–20% of cases),18 yet their initial angiography is usually delayed for hours or days after the initial presentation.

A subgroup analysis from TRITON–TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38) evaluated patients with isolated anterior ST-segment depression. An occluded “culprit” artery was found 26% of the time, most often the left circumflex artery. Moreover, those patients had a significantly higher rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30-day follow-up than patients without a culprit artery, probably related to delayed revascularization.22

Recognizing that ST-segment depression that is greatest in leads V1, V2, or V3 represents posterior infarction helps identify a portion of the missed STEMIs in a timely fashion. In addition, in cases of anterior ST-segment depression and in cases of chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiography, the recording of ST elevation in leads V7, V8, and V9 is highly sensitive for detecting a true posterior injury.

 

 

Acute pulmonary embolism

An anterior ischemic pattern of symmetric T-wave inversion in the precordial leads V1 through V4 may also be a sign of acute or chronic right ventricular strain, particularly acute pulmonary embolism. Sinus tachycardia is usually present, but other signs of pulmonary embolism, such as right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block, may be absent. In fact, T-wave inversion in leads V1 through V4 is noted in 19% of patients with nonmassive pulmonary embolism and in 85% of patients with massive pulmonary embolism, and is the most sensitive and specific electrocardiographic finding in massive pulmonary embolism.23

In addition, acute pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in leads III and aVF,24 and changes of concomitant anterior and inferior ischemia should always raise the question of this diagnosis.

In one retrospective study of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, nonspecific ST-segment or T-wave changes were the most common finding on electrocardiography, noted in 49%.25 Rapid regression of these changes on serial tracings favors pulmonary embolism rather than myocardial infarction.

ST-segment depression reciprocal to a subtle ST-segment elevation

When ST-segment elevation occurs in two contiguous standard leads while ST-segment depression occurs in other leads, and when the ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities are ischemic rather than secondary to depolarization abnormalities, ST-segment elevation is considered the primary ischemic abnormality whereas ST-segment depression is often considered a reciprocal “mirror image” change. This “reciprocal” change may also represent remote ischemia in a distant territory in patients with multivessel coronary disease.26,27

Reciprocal ST-segment depression is present in all patients with inferior myocardial infarction and in 70% of patients with anterior myocardial infarction.28

Figure 6. Example of subtle ST-segment elevation in two contiguous leads with a prominent ST-segment depression in other leads. The ST segment is depressed in leads I and aVL and V4, V5, and V6. There is a subtle ST-segment elevation with a broad hyperacute T wave in leads III and aVF fused with the ST segment in a convex fashion (arrows), suggesting that the primary abnormality is actually an acute inferior injury. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded right coronary artery in its mid-segment and severe left circumflex disease. The ST-segment depression is partly reciprocal to the inferior injury and partly a reflection of left circumflex-related ischemia.
However, it is important to recognize that the magnitude of ST-segment elevation and reciprocal ST-segment depression is affected by the distance of the leads recording these changes from the ischemic region and their angle of deviation from the ischemic region.29 This explains why occasionally—and particularly when the overall amplitude of the QRS complex is low—the magnitude of ST-segment elevation is small, whereas the reciprocal ST-segment depression is more prominent. In fact, in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, the reciprocal ST-segment depression should be sought. It is of great utility in patients with acute cardiac symptoms and mild elevation of ST segments of 1 to 1.5 mm in two contiguous leads, as it strongly suggests the diagnosis of STEMI rather than other causes of mild ST-segment elevation (1–1.5 mm) (Figure 6).30 The less-pronounced ST-segment elevation is often overlooked, and the patient is erroneously diagnosed with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome rather than STEMI. This has a marked impact on patient management, as STEMI requires emergency revascularization, while non–ST-segment elevation ischemia requires early (but not emergency) coronary angiography.

Hypokalemia and digitalis effect

Figure 7. (A) Note the progressive flattening of the T wave, increase in U wave amplitude, and depression of the ST segment with progressive levels of hypokalemia (serum potassium levels are expressed in mEq/L). (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with a serum potassium level of 2.8 mEq/L. Note the flattened T waves (bars) and the prominent U waves (arrows).
ST-segment depression, T-wave flattening, and prominent U waves are the hallmarks of hypokalemia and can be mistaken for ischemic changes, including ischemic lengthening of the QT interval (Figure 7).31–34 Digitalis also produces ST-segment depression, low or inverted T waves, and prominent U waves, but the U waves rarely are of the giant variety seen with severe hypokalemia, and the ST-segment depression has a sagging shape. In addition, digitalis shortens the QT interval.

DIFFUSE (GLOBAL) T-WAVE INVERSION

Reproduced with permission from Glancy DL, et al. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:81–82.
Figure 8. Global T-wave inversion with marked QT prolongation in a 77-year-old woman presenting with dyspnea and elevated cardiac biomarkers. Her coronary arteriography showed a 90% distal left main stenosis extending into the proximal left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries.
This term is applied when the T wave is inverted in most of the standard leads except aVR, which shows a reciprocal upright T wave. The QT interval is often prolonged, and T-wave inversion is often symmetric and “giant” (> 10 mm) (Figure 8).1,35

Walder and Spodick36 have found this pattern to be caused most often by myocardial ischemia or neurologic events, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, and it seems more prevalent in women. Other causes include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress-induced cardiomyopathy (takotsubo cardiomyopathy), cocaine abuse, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, and advanced or complete atrioventricular block.36,37

The prognosis in patients with global T-wave inversion is determined by the underlying disease, and the striking T-wave changes per se do not imply a poor prognosis.38

Figure 9. (A) Persistent juvenile T-wave pattern in a 40-year-old woman with T-wave inversion extending from lead V1 to lead V4. The depth of the inverted T waves decreases between V1 and V4. Also, the T wave progressively becomes less deeply inverted as the patient ages. (B) Normal variant terminal T-wave inversion with ST-segment elevation in leads V2 through V5 in a 21-year-old black man. This pattern is most often seen in young black men, a few of whom at other times manifest the typical early repolarization pattern. The age and clinical presentation distinguish this pattern from Wellens-type T waves.
Of note, takotsubo cardiomyopathy is characterized by electrocardiographic changes that mimic ischemia, especially STEMI, and is often impossible to differentiate from myocardial ischemia related to a coronary event without performing coronary arteriography. The most common abnormality on the admission electrocardiogram is ST-segment elevation (present in 46%–100% of patients), typically seen in the precordial leads. Within 48 hours of presentation, almost all patients also develop postischemic diffuse T-wave inversion and prolongation of the QT interval. New Q waves may be seen in 6% to 31% of patients and are usually transient.39,40

OTHER CAUSES OF T-WAVE INVERSION OR ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION

Various other entities may cause T-wave inversion, notably acute pericarditis or myocarditis, 41,42 memory T-wave phenomenon,43,44 and normal variants of repolarization (Table 1, Figure 9).45 Additionally, a nonpathologic junctional ST-segment depression may be seen in tachycardia (Figure 10).

Figure 10. (A) Up-sloping ST-segment depression in a case of sinus tachycardia. This is related to the exaggerated atrial repolarization that occurs during tachycardia and depresses the PR segment and the initial portion of the ST-segment when compared with the TP segment. (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with sinus tachycardia and junctional ST-segment depression in leads II and V4 through V6. It has no pathologic significance.

References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial ischemia. In: Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:194207.
  3. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:E1E211.
  4. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, et al; LIFE Study Investigators. Electrocardiographic strain pattern and prediction of new-onset congestive heart failure in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. Circulation 2006; 113:6773.
  5. Huwez FU, Pringle SD, Macfarlane PW. Variable patterns of ST-T abnormalities in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J 1992; 67:304307.
  6. Li D, Li CY, Yong AC, Kilpatrick D. Source of electrocardiographic ST changes in subendocardial ischemia. Circ Res 1998; 82:957970.
  7. Gorgels AP, Vos MA, Mulleneers R, de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72:9991003.
  8. Glancy DL. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J La State Med Soc 2002; 154:6675.
  9. Yamaji H, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, et al. Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:13481354.
  10. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1982; 103:730736.
  11. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Janssen JH, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am Heart J 1989; 117:657665.
  12. Lilaonitkul M, Robinson K, Roberts M. Wellens’ syndrome: significance of ECG pattern recognition in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2009; 26:750751.
  13. Glancy DL, Khuri B, Cospolich B. Heed the warning: Wellens’ type T-wave inversion is caused by proximal left anterior descending lesion. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2000; 13:416418.
  14. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999; 281:707713.
  15. Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Perach W, Perruchoud AP, Buettner HJ. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with very early revascularization. Am J Med 2004; 117:145150.
  16. Boden WE, Spodick DH. Diagnostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:358361.
  17. Shah A, Wagner GS, Green CL, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of the ST-segment depression of acute myocardial injury due to the left circumflex artery occlusion from that of myocardial ischemia of nonocclusive etiologies. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:512513.
  18. Krishnaswamy A, Lincoff AM, Menon V. Magnitude and consequences of missing the acute infarct-related circumflex artery. Am Heart J 2009; 158:706712.
  19. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Feinberg MS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: “hidden” ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:748753.
  20. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506511.
  21. Huey BL, Beller GA, Kaiser DL, Gibson RS. A comprehensive analysis of myocardial infarction due to left circumflex artery occlusion: comparison with infarction due to right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:11561166.
  22. Gibson CM, Pride YB, Mohanavelu S, Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Abstract 1999: Angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting with isolated anterior ST-segment depressions. Circulation 2008; 118:S–654.
  23. Ferrari E, Imbert A, Chevalier T, Mihoubi A, Morand P, Baudouy M. The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads—80 case reports. Chest 1997; 111:537543.
  24. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298303.
  25. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991; 100:598603.
  26. Norell MS, Lyons JP, Gardener JE, Layton CA, Balcon R. Significance of “reciprocal” ST segment depression: left ventriculographic observations during left anterior descending coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:12701274.
  27. Haraphongse M, Tanomsup S, Jugdutt BI. Inferior ST segment depression during acute anterior myocardial infarction: clinical and angiographic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4:467476.
  28. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Acute ischemia: electrocardiographic patterns. In: Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:122153.
  29. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:10031011.
  30. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Syverud SA, et al. Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:3538.
  31. Surawicz B. Electrolytes and the electrocardiogram. Postgrad Med 1974; 55:123129.
  32. Diercks DB, Shumaik GM, Harrigan RA, Brady WJ, Chan TC. Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities. J Emerg Med 2004; 27:153160.
  33. Glancy DL, Wang WL. ECG of the month. Abnormal electrocardiogram in a woman with a urinary tract infection. Sinus rhythm, rate 82/minute. Sagging ST segments, low T waves, and prominent U waves suggest hypokalemia. J La State Med Soc 2007; 159:57.
  34. Surawicz B, Braun HA, Crum WB, Kemp RL, Wagner S, Bellet S. Quantitative analysis of the electrocardiographic pattern of hypopotassemia. Circulation 1957; 16:750763.
  35. Glancy DL, Rochon BJ, Ilie CC, Parker JM, Jones MB, Atluri P. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:8182.
  36. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:14791485.
  37. Lui CY. Acute pulmonary embolism as the cause of global T wave inversion and QT prolongation. A case report. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26:9195.
  38. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion: long-term followup. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:16521656.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858865.
  40. Wittstein IS, Thiemann DR, Lima JA, et al. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:539548.
  41. Spodick DH. Electrocardiogram in acute pericarditis. Distributions of morphologic and axial changes by stages. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33:470474.
  42. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876890.
  43. Rosenbaum MB, Blanco HH, Elizari MV, Lázzari JO, Davidenko JM. Electrotonic modulation of the T wave and cardiac memory. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50:213222.
  44. Paparella N, Ouyang F, Fuca G, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Alboni P. Significance of newly acquired negative T waves after interruption of paroxysmal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia with narrow QRS complex. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:261263.
  45. Kaid KA, Maqsood A, Cohen M, Rothfeld E. Further characterization of the “persistent juvenile T-wave pattern” in adults. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41:644645.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Internal Medicine Department, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70123. e-mail ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
404-414
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Internal Medicine Department, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70123. e-mail ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Author and Disclosure Information

Elias B. Hanna, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

David Luke Glancy, MD
Cardiovascular Department, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Address: Elias B. Hanna, MD, Internal Medicine Department, Cardiovascular Section, Louisiana State University, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 323, New Orleans, LA, 70123. e-mail ehanna@lsuhsc.edu

Article PDF
Article PDF

Depression of the ST segment and inversion of the T wave are common electrocardiographic abnormalities. Knowing the various ischemic and nonischemic morphologic features is critical for a timely diagnosis of high-risk myocardial ischemia and electrolyte- or drug-related abnormalities. Moreover, it is important to recognize that true posterior infarction or subtle ST-segment elevation infarction may masquerade as ST-segment depression ischemia, and that pulmonary embolism may masquerade as anterior ischemia. These common electrocardiographic abnormalities are summarized in Table 1.

THE ST SEGMENT AND THE T WAVE: A PRIMER

Abnormalities of the ST segment and the T wave represent abnormalities of ventricular repolarization.

The ST segment corresponds to the plateau phase of ventricular repolarization (phase 2 of the action potential), while the T wave corresponds to the phase of rapid ventricular repolarization (phase 3). ST-segment or T-wave changes may be secondary to abnormalities of depolarization, ie, pre-excitation or abnormalities of QRS voltage or duration.

On the other hand, ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities may be unrelated to any QRS abnormality, in which case they are called primary repolarization abnormalities. These are caused by ischemia, pericarditis, myocarditis, drugs (digoxin, antiarrhythmic drugs), and electrolyte abnormalities, particularly potassium abnormalities.

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 But some prefer to measure the magnitude of the ST-segment deviation 40 to 80 ms after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment; at the very onset of repolarization, small differences in membrane potential may normally be seen and may cause deviation of the J point and of the early portion of the ST segment.2

Although a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that mandates emergency reperfusion therapy requires ST-segment elevation greater than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads,3 any ST-segment depression or elevation (≥ 0.5 mm, using the usual standard of 1.0 mV = 10 mm) may be abnormal, particularly when the clinical context or the shape of the ST segment suggests ischemia, or when other ischemic signs such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are concomitantly present. On the other hand, ST-segment depression of up to 0.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 and 1 mm in the other leads may be normal.1

In adults, the T wave normally is inverted in lead aVR; is upright or inverted in leads aVL, III, and V1; and is upright in leads I, II, aVF, and V2 through V6. The T wave is considered inverted when it is deeper than 1 mm; it is considered flat when its peak amplitude is between 1.0 mm and −1.0 mm.1

As we will discuss, certain features allow the various causes of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities to be distinguished from one another.

SECONDARY ST-SEGMENT AND T-WAVE ABNORMALITIES

Modified with permission from Hanna EB, Quintal R, Jain N. Cardiology: Handbook for Clinicians. Arlington, VA: Scrubhill Press; 2009:328–354.
Figure 1. ST-segment and T-wave morphologies in cases of secondary abnormalities (A) and ischemic abnormalities (B–E).
In secondary ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities, QRS criteria for left or right ventricular hypertrophy or left or right bundle branch block or pre-excitation are usually present, and the ST segment and T wave have all of the following morphologic features (Figure 1A):

  • The ST segment and T wave are directed opposite to the QRS: this is called discordance between the QRS complex and the ST-T abnormalities. In the case of right bundle branch block, the ST and T are directed opposite to the terminal portion of the QRS, ie, the part of the QRS deformed by the conduction abnormality.
  • The ST segment and T wave are both abnormal and deviate in the same direction, ie, the ST segment is down-sloping and the T wave is inverted in leads with an upright QRS complex, which gives the ST-T complex a “reverse checkmark” asymmetric morphology.
  • The ST and T abnormalities are not dynamic, ie, they do not change in the course of several hours to several days.

Figure 2. Example of left ventricular hypertrophy with typical secondary ST-T abnormalities in leads I, II, aVL, V4, V5, and V6. The QRS complex is upright in these leads while the ST segment and T wave are directed in the opposite direction, ie, the QRS and the ST-T complexes are discordant.

Thus, in cases of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, since the QRS complex is upright in the left lateral leads I, aVL, V5, and V6, the ST segment is characteristically depressed and the T wave is inverted in these leads (Figure 2). In cases of right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block, T waves are characteristically inverted in the right precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.

Left bundle branch block is always associated with secondary ST-T abnormalities, the absence of which suggests associated ischemia. Left and right ventricular hypertrophy, on the other hand, are not always associated with ST-T abnormalities, but when these are present, they correlate with more severe hypertrophy or ventricular systolic dysfunction,4 and have been called strain pattern. In addition, while these morphologic features are consistent with secondary abnormalities, they do not rule out ischemia in a patient with angina.

Some exceptions to these typical morphologic features:

  • Right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may be associated with isolated T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression in precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy may be associated with symmetric T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression or with a horizontally depressed ST segment. This may be the case in up to one-third of ST-T abnormalities secondary to left ventricular hypertrophy and is seen in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly the apical variant, in leads V3 through V6.5
 

 

ISCHEMIC ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION, T-WAVE INVERSION, OR BOTH

ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is consistent with ischemia if any of the following is true:

  • The ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is directed in the same direction as the QRS complex: this is called concordance between the QRS complex and the ST or T abnormality (Figure 1B).
  • The ST segment is depressed but the T wave is upright (Figure 1C).
  • The T wave has a positive-negative biphasic pattern (Figure 1D).
  • The T wave is symmetrically inverted and has a pointed configuration, while the ST segment is not deviated or is upwardly bowed (coved) or horizontally depressed (Figure 1E).
  • The magnitude of ST-segment depression progresses or regresses on serial tracings, or ST-segment depression progresses to T-wave abnormality during ischemia-free intervals (dynamic ST-segment depression).

Figure 3. Electrocardiogram of a patient with angina at rest and elevated cardiac biomarkers. ST-segment depression in nine leads with elevation in leads aVR and V1 suggested subendocardial ischemia related to three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. He had severe three-vessel disease on coronary arteriography.

Unlike ST-segment elevation, ST-segment depression does not localize ischemia.6 However, the extent and the magnitude of ST-segment depression correlate with the extent and the severity of ischemia. In fact, ST-segment depression in eight or more leads, combined with ST-segment elevation in leads aVR and V1 and occurring during ischemic pain, is associated with a 75% predictive accuracy for left main coronary artery or three-vessel disease (Figure 3).7,8 This finding may also be seen in cases of tight proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.9

Wellens syndrome

Figure 4. (A) Wellens-type biphasic T wave in leads V2 and V3 (arrows) and T-wave inversion in leads V4 and V5. (B) Wellens-type deep T-wave inversion in leads V2 to V4. Each patient had a 90% proximal left anterior descending stenosis at coronary arteriography.
Either the positive-negative biphasic T waves of the type shown in Figure 1D or the deeply inverted (≥ 5 mm) T waves that often follow them, when occurring in the precordial leads V2 and V3, with or without similar changes in V1, V4, and V5, are nearly pathognomonic of very recent severe ischemia or injury in the distribution of the left anterior descending artery and characterize what is known as Wellens syndrome (Figure 4).10–13

Wellens and his colleagues showed that 75% of patients who developed these T-wave abnormalities and who were treated medically without angiographic investigation went on to develop extensive anterior wall myocardial infarction within a mean of 8.5 days.10

In a later investigation of 1,260 patients presenting with unstable angina, 180 patients (14%) had this characteristic T-wave pattern.11 All of the latter patients had stenosis of 50% or more in the proximal left anterior descending artery, and 18% had total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery.

Thus, although medical management may provide symptomatic improvement at first, early coronary angiography and revascularization should be strongly considered in anyone with Wellens syndrome because it usually predicts impending anterior myocardial infarction.

Wellens syndrome is characterized by two patterns of T-wave changes. In 75% of cases, T waves are deeply (≥ 5 mm) and symmetrically inverted in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1E, 4B). In 25% of cases, the T wave has a characteristic positive-negative biphasic morphology in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1D, 4A).10 In both patterns, the ST segment is isoelectric or minimally elevated (< 1 mm) with a straight or convex morphology, the down-slope of the T wave is sharp, and the QT interval is often prolonged. These abnormalities are characteristically seen hours to days after the ischemic chest pain resolves. In fact, the ischemic episode is usually associated with transient ST-segment elevation or depression that progresses to the T-wave abnormality after the pain subsides.11

In Wellens’ original description, only 12% of patients had increases in their creatine kinase levels, and these were small. Therefore, the electrocardiogram may be the only indication of an impending large anterior infarction in a chest-pain-free patient.12

T waves that are symmetrically but less deeply inverted than Wellens-type T waves may still represent ischemia. However, this finding is less specific for ischemia and is associated with better outcomes than Wellens syndrome or ST-segment deviation, particularly when the T wave is less than 3 mm deep.14 In fact, one prospective cohort study found that isolated mild T-wave inversion in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome is associated with a favorable long-term outcome, similar to that in patients with no electrocardiographic changes.15

FREQUENTLY MISSED DIAGNOSES MANIFESTING AS ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION OR T-WAVE INVERSION

True posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

When accompanied by inferior STEMI, posterior infarction is easily recognized, but it can be difficult to diagnose when it occurs alone, the so-called true posterior STEMI.

Figure 5. (A) ST-segment depression in the precordial leads V1–V4, with a maximal depression in lead V3, in a patient with severe ongoing chest pain for the preceding 3 hours. This suggests a posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. There is also a subtle ST-segment elevation in lead III, which further alludes to the diagnosis of inferoposterior infarction. Emergency coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded mid-left circumflex coronary artery. (B) The ST segment is depressed in leads V1 through V6 and leads II, III, and aVF, with a maximal depression in leads V2 and V3. In addition, tall R waves are seen in leads V1 and V2 and Q waves are seen in the lateral leads I and aVL accompanied by ST elevation in aVL. In a patient with severe persistent chest pain, this suggests a posterolateral infarct. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded second obtuse marginal branch.
ST-segment depression that is most prominent in leads V1 through V3 often indicates posterior STEMI rather than non–ST-segment elevation ischemia and indicates the need for emergency revascularization. In fact, in the setting of posterior infarction, leads V1, V2, and V3 predominate as the areas of maximum depression, whereas greater ST-segment depression in the lateral precordial leads (V4, V5, and V6) or inferior leads (II, III, and aVF) is more indicative of nonocclusive and nonregional subendocardial ischemia (Figure 5).8,16–18

In most cases of posterior infarction, the posterior chest leads V7, V8, and V9 reveal ST-segment elevation.19 One study found that ST-segment depression in the anterior precordial leads was as sensitive as ST-segment elevation in leads V7 through V9 in identifying posterior myocardial infarction (sensitivity 80%),20 while other studies found that ST-segment deviation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography has a lower sensitivity (about 60%) in identifying posterior infarction.18,21

Tall or wide (≥ 0.04-s) R waves in leads V1 or V2, particularly when associated with upright T waves, suggest posterior infarction and may further corroborate this diagnosis, but this finding may take up to 24 hours to manifest and is seen in only about 50% of patients with posterior infarction.21

Studies have shown that ST-segment elevation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography is found in fewer than 50% of patients with acute left circumflex occlusion and inferoposterior infarction,18 yet these are cases of “missed” STEMI that indeed benefit from emergency angiography and reperfusion. In addition, studies of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome consistently identify patients who have epicardial vessel occlusion (about 15%–20% of cases),18 yet their initial angiography is usually delayed for hours or days after the initial presentation.

A subgroup analysis from TRITON–TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38) evaluated patients with isolated anterior ST-segment depression. An occluded “culprit” artery was found 26% of the time, most often the left circumflex artery. Moreover, those patients had a significantly higher rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30-day follow-up than patients without a culprit artery, probably related to delayed revascularization.22

Recognizing that ST-segment depression that is greatest in leads V1, V2, or V3 represents posterior infarction helps identify a portion of the missed STEMIs in a timely fashion. In addition, in cases of anterior ST-segment depression and in cases of chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiography, the recording of ST elevation in leads V7, V8, and V9 is highly sensitive for detecting a true posterior injury.

 

 

Acute pulmonary embolism

An anterior ischemic pattern of symmetric T-wave inversion in the precordial leads V1 through V4 may also be a sign of acute or chronic right ventricular strain, particularly acute pulmonary embolism. Sinus tachycardia is usually present, but other signs of pulmonary embolism, such as right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block, may be absent. In fact, T-wave inversion in leads V1 through V4 is noted in 19% of patients with nonmassive pulmonary embolism and in 85% of patients with massive pulmonary embolism, and is the most sensitive and specific electrocardiographic finding in massive pulmonary embolism.23

In addition, acute pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in leads III and aVF,24 and changes of concomitant anterior and inferior ischemia should always raise the question of this diagnosis.

In one retrospective study of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, nonspecific ST-segment or T-wave changes were the most common finding on electrocardiography, noted in 49%.25 Rapid regression of these changes on serial tracings favors pulmonary embolism rather than myocardial infarction.

ST-segment depression reciprocal to a subtle ST-segment elevation

When ST-segment elevation occurs in two contiguous standard leads while ST-segment depression occurs in other leads, and when the ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities are ischemic rather than secondary to depolarization abnormalities, ST-segment elevation is considered the primary ischemic abnormality whereas ST-segment depression is often considered a reciprocal “mirror image” change. This “reciprocal” change may also represent remote ischemia in a distant territory in patients with multivessel coronary disease.26,27

Reciprocal ST-segment depression is present in all patients with inferior myocardial infarction and in 70% of patients with anterior myocardial infarction.28

Figure 6. Example of subtle ST-segment elevation in two contiguous leads with a prominent ST-segment depression in other leads. The ST segment is depressed in leads I and aVL and V4, V5, and V6. There is a subtle ST-segment elevation with a broad hyperacute T wave in leads III and aVF fused with the ST segment in a convex fashion (arrows), suggesting that the primary abnormality is actually an acute inferior injury. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded right coronary artery in its mid-segment and severe left circumflex disease. The ST-segment depression is partly reciprocal to the inferior injury and partly a reflection of left circumflex-related ischemia.
However, it is important to recognize that the magnitude of ST-segment elevation and reciprocal ST-segment depression is affected by the distance of the leads recording these changes from the ischemic region and their angle of deviation from the ischemic region.29 This explains why occasionally—and particularly when the overall amplitude of the QRS complex is low—the magnitude of ST-segment elevation is small, whereas the reciprocal ST-segment depression is more prominent. In fact, in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, the reciprocal ST-segment depression should be sought. It is of great utility in patients with acute cardiac symptoms and mild elevation of ST segments of 1 to 1.5 mm in two contiguous leads, as it strongly suggests the diagnosis of STEMI rather than other causes of mild ST-segment elevation (1–1.5 mm) (Figure 6).30 The less-pronounced ST-segment elevation is often overlooked, and the patient is erroneously diagnosed with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome rather than STEMI. This has a marked impact on patient management, as STEMI requires emergency revascularization, while non–ST-segment elevation ischemia requires early (but not emergency) coronary angiography.

Hypokalemia and digitalis effect

Figure 7. (A) Note the progressive flattening of the T wave, increase in U wave amplitude, and depression of the ST segment with progressive levels of hypokalemia (serum potassium levels are expressed in mEq/L). (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with a serum potassium level of 2.8 mEq/L. Note the flattened T waves (bars) and the prominent U waves (arrows).
ST-segment depression, T-wave flattening, and prominent U waves are the hallmarks of hypokalemia and can be mistaken for ischemic changes, including ischemic lengthening of the QT interval (Figure 7).31–34 Digitalis also produces ST-segment depression, low or inverted T waves, and prominent U waves, but the U waves rarely are of the giant variety seen with severe hypokalemia, and the ST-segment depression has a sagging shape. In addition, digitalis shortens the QT interval.

DIFFUSE (GLOBAL) T-WAVE INVERSION

Reproduced with permission from Glancy DL, et al. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:81–82.
Figure 8. Global T-wave inversion with marked QT prolongation in a 77-year-old woman presenting with dyspnea and elevated cardiac biomarkers. Her coronary arteriography showed a 90% distal left main stenosis extending into the proximal left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries.
This term is applied when the T wave is inverted in most of the standard leads except aVR, which shows a reciprocal upright T wave. The QT interval is often prolonged, and T-wave inversion is often symmetric and “giant” (> 10 mm) (Figure 8).1,35

Walder and Spodick36 have found this pattern to be caused most often by myocardial ischemia or neurologic events, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, and it seems more prevalent in women. Other causes include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress-induced cardiomyopathy (takotsubo cardiomyopathy), cocaine abuse, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, and advanced or complete atrioventricular block.36,37

The prognosis in patients with global T-wave inversion is determined by the underlying disease, and the striking T-wave changes per se do not imply a poor prognosis.38

Figure 9. (A) Persistent juvenile T-wave pattern in a 40-year-old woman with T-wave inversion extending from lead V1 to lead V4. The depth of the inverted T waves decreases between V1 and V4. Also, the T wave progressively becomes less deeply inverted as the patient ages. (B) Normal variant terminal T-wave inversion with ST-segment elevation in leads V2 through V5 in a 21-year-old black man. This pattern is most often seen in young black men, a few of whom at other times manifest the typical early repolarization pattern. The age and clinical presentation distinguish this pattern from Wellens-type T waves.
Of note, takotsubo cardiomyopathy is characterized by electrocardiographic changes that mimic ischemia, especially STEMI, and is often impossible to differentiate from myocardial ischemia related to a coronary event without performing coronary arteriography. The most common abnormality on the admission electrocardiogram is ST-segment elevation (present in 46%–100% of patients), typically seen in the precordial leads. Within 48 hours of presentation, almost all patients also develop postischemic diffuse T-wave inversion and prolongation of the QT interval. New Q waves may be seen in 6% to 31% of patients and are usually transient.39,40

OTHER CAUSES OF T-WAVE INVERSION OR ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION

Various other entities may cause T-wave inversion, notably acute pericarditis or myocarditis, 41,42 memory T-wave phenomenon,43,44 and normal variants of repolarization (Table 1, Figure 9).45 Additionally, a nonpathologic junctional ST-segment depression may be seen in tachycardia (Figure 10).

Figure 10. (A) Up-sloping ST-segment depression in a case of sinus tachycardia. This is related to the exaggerated atrial repolarization that occurs during tachycardia and depresses the PR segment and the initial portion of the ST-segment when compared with the TP segment. (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with sinus tachycardia and junctional ST-segment depression in leads II and V4 through V6. It has no pathologic significance.

Depression of the ST segment and inversion of the T wave are common electrocardiographic abnormalities. Knowing the various ischemic and nonischemic morphologic features is critical for a timely diagnosis of high-risk myocardial ischemia and electrolyte- or drug-related abnormalities. Moreover, it is important to recognize that true posterior infarction or subtle ST-segment elevation infarction may masquerade as ST-segment depression ischemia, and that pulmonary embolism may masquerade as anterior ischemia. These common electrocardiographic abnormalities are summarized in Table 1.

THE ST SEGMENT AND THE T WAVE: A PRIMER

Abnormalities of the ST segment and the T wave represent abnormalities of ventricular repolarization.

The ST segment corresponds to the plateau phase of ventricular repolarization (phase 2 of the action potential), while the T wave corresponds to the phase of rapid ventricular repolarization (phase 3). ST-segment or T-wave changes may be secondary to abnormalities of depolarization, ie, pre-excitation or abnormalities of QRS voltage or duration.

On the other hand, ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities may be unrelated to any QRS abnormality, in which case they are called primary repolarization abnormalities. These are caused by ischemia, pericarditis, myocarditis, drugs (digoxin, antiarrhythmic drugs), and electrolyte abnormalities, particularly potassium abnormalities.

ST-segment deviation is usually measured at its junction with the end of the QRS complex, ie, the J point, and is referenced against the TP or PR segment.1 But some prefer to measure the magnitude of the ST-segment deviation 40 to 80 ms after the J point, when all myocardial fibers are expected to have reached the same level of membrane potential and to form an isoelectric ST segment; at the very onset of repolarization, small differences in membrane potential may normally be seen and may cause deviation of the J point and of the early portion of the ST segment.2

Although a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that mandates emergency reperfusion therapy requires ST-segment elevation greater than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads,3 any ST-segment depression or elevation (≥ 0.5 mm, using the usual standard of 1.0 mV = 10 mm) may be abnormal, particularly when the clinical context or the shape of the ST segment suggests ischemia, or when other ischemic signs such as T-wave abnormalities, Q waves, or reciprocal ST-segment changes are concomitantly present. On the other hand, ST-segment depression of up to 0.5 mm in leads V2 and V3 and 1 mm in the other leads may be normal.1

In adults, the T wave normally is inverted in lead aVR; is upright or inverted in leads aVL, III, and V1; and is upright in leads I, II, aVF, and V2 through V6. The T wave is considered inverted when it is deeper than 1 mm; it is considered flat when its peak amplitude is between 1.0 mm and −1.0 mm.1

As we will discuss, certain features allow the various causes of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities to be distinguished from one another.

SECONDARY ST-SEGMENT AND T-WAVE ABNORMALITIES

Modified with permission from Hanna EB, Quintal R, Jain N. Cardiology: Handbook for Clinicians. Arlington, VA: Scrubhill Press; 2009:328–354.
Figure 1. ST-segment and T-wave morphologies in cases of secondary abnormalities (A) and ischemic abnormalities (B–E).
In secondary ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities, QRS criteria for left or right ventricular hypertrophy or left or right bundle branch block or pre-excitation are usually present, and the ST segment and T wave have all of the following morphologic features (Figure 1A):

  • The ST segment and T wave are directed opposite to the QRS: this is called discordance between the QRS complex and the ST-T abnormalities. In the case of right bundle branch block, the ST and T are directed opposite to the terminal portion of the QRS, ie, the part of the QRS deformed by the conduction abnormality.
  • The ST segment and T wave are both abnormal and deviate in the same direction, ie, the ST segment is down-sloping and the T wave is inverted in leads with an upright QRS complex, which gives the ST-T complex a “reverse checkmark” asymmetric morphology.
  • The ST and T abnormalities are not dynamic, ie, they do not change in the course of several hours to several days.

Figure 2. Example of left ventricular hypertrophy with typical secondary ST-T abnormalities in leads I, II, aVL, V4, V5, and V6. The QRS complex is upright in these leads while the ST segment and T wave are directed in the opposite direction, ie, the QRS and the ST-T complexes are discordant.

Thus, in cases of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, since the QRS complex is upright in the left lateral leads I, aVL, V5, and V6, the ST segment is characteristically depressed and the T wave is inverted in these leads (Figure 2). In cases of right ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block, T waves are characteristically inverted in the right precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.

Left bundle branch block is always associated with secondary ST-T abnormalities, the absence of which suggests associated ischemia. Left and right ventricular hypertrophy, on the other hand, are not always associated with ST-T abnormalities, but when these are present, they correlate with more severe hypertrophy or ventricular systolic dysfunction,4 and have been called strain pattern. In addition, while these morphologic features are consistent with secondary abnormalities, they do not rule out ischemia in a patient with angina.

Some exceptions to these typical morphologic features:

  • Right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block may be associated with isolated T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression in precordial leads V1, V2, and V3.
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy may be associated with symmetric T-wave inversion without ST-segment depression or with a horizontally depressed ST segment. This may be the case in up to one-third of ST-T abnormalities secondary to left ventricular hypertrophy and is seen in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly the apical variant, in leads V3 through V6.5
 

 

ISCHEMIC ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION, T-WAVE INVERSION, OR BOTH

ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is consistent with ischemia if any of the following is true:

  • The ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion is directed in the same direction as the QRS complex: this is called concordance between the QRS complex and the ST or T abnormality (Figure 1B).
  • The ST segment is depressed but the T wave is upright (Figure 1C).
  • The T wave has a positive-negative biphasic pattern (Figure 1D).
  • The T wave is symmetrically inverted and has a pointed configuration, while the ST segment is not deviated or is upwardly bowed (coved) or horizontally depressed (Figure 1E).
  • The magnitude of ST-segment depression progresses or regresses on serial tracings, or ST-segment depression progresses to T-wave abnormality during ischemia-free intervals (dynamic ST-segment depression).

Figure 3. Electrocardiogram of a patient with angina at rest and elevated cardiac biomarkers. ST-segment depression in nine leads with elevation in leads aVR and V1 suggested subendocardial ischemia related to three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. He had severe three-vessel disease on coronary arteriography.

Unlike ST-segment elevation, ST-segment depression does not localize ischemia.6 However, the extent and the magnitude of ST-segment depression correlate with the extent and the severity of ischemia. In fact, ST-segment depression in eight or more leads, combined with ST-segment elevation in leads aVR and V1 and occurring during ischemic pain, is associated with a 75% predictive accuracy for left main coronary artery or three-vessel disease (Figure 3).7,8 This finding may also be seen in cases of tight proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.9

Wellens syndrome

Figure 4. (A) Wellens-type biphasic T wave in leads V2 and V3 (arrows) and T-wave inversion in leads V4 and V5. (B) Wellens-type deep T-wave inversion in leads V2 to V4. Each patient had a 90% proximal left anterior descending stenosis at coronary arteriography.
Either the positive-negative biphasic T waves of the type shown in Figure 1D or the deeply inverted (≥ 5 mm) T waves that often follow them, when occurring in the precordial leads V2 and V3, with or without similar changes in V1, V4, and V5, are nearly pathognomonic of very recent severe ischemia or injury in the distribution of the left anterior descending artery and characterize what is known as Wellens syndrome (Figure 4).10–13

Wellens and his colleagues showed that 75% of patients who developed these T-wave abnormalities and who were treated medically without angiographic investigation went on to develop extensive anterior wall myocardial infarction within a mean of 8.5 days.10

In a later investigation of 1,260 patients presenting with unstable angina, 180 patients (14%) had this characteristic T-wave pattern.11 All of the latter patients had stenosis of 50% or more in the proximal left anterior descending artery, and 18% had total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery.

Thus, although medical management may provide symptomatic improvement at first, early coronary angiography and revascularization should be strongly considered in anyone with Wellens syndrome because it usually predicts impending anterior myocardial infarction.

Wellens syndrome is characterized by two patterns of T-wave changes. In 75% of cases, T waves are deeply (≥ 5 mm) and symmetrically inverted in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1E, 4B). In 25% of cases, the T wave has a characteristic positive-negative biphasic morphology in leads V2 through V4 (Figures 1D, 4A).10 In both patterns, the ST segment is isoelectric or minimally elevated (< 1 mm) with a straight or convex morphology, the down-slope of the T wave is sharp, and the QT interval is often prolonged. These abnormalities are characteristically seen hours to days after the ischemic chest pain resolves. In fact, the ischemic episode is usually associated with transient ST-segment elevation or depression that progresses to the T-wave abnormality after the pain subsides.11

In Wellens’ original description, only 12% of patients had increases in their creatine kinase levels, and these were small. Therefore, the electrocardiogram may be the only indication of an impending large anterior infarction in a chest-pain-free patient.12

T waves that are symmetrically but less deeply inverted than Wellens-type T waves may still represent ischemia. However, this finding is less specific for ischemia and is associated with better outcomes than Wellens syndrome or ST-segment deviation, particularly when the T wave is less than 3 mm deep.14 In fact, one prospective cohort study found that isolated mild T-wave inversion in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome is associated with a favorable long-term outcome, similar to that in patients with no electrocardiographic changes.15

FREQUENTLY MISSED DIAGNOSES MANIFESTING AS ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION OR T-WAVE INVERSION

True posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

When accompanied by inferior STEMI, posterior infarction is easily recognized, but it can be difficult to diagnose when it occurs alone, the so-called true posterior STEMI.

Figure 5. (A) ST-segment depression in the precordial leads V1–V4, with a maximal depression in lead V3, in a patient with severe ongoing chest pain for the preceding 3 hours. This suggests a posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. There is also a subtle ST-segment elevation in lead III, which further alludes to the diagnosis of inferoposterior infarction. Emergency coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded mid-left circumflex coronary artery. (B) The ST segment is depressed in leads V1 through V6 and leads II, III, and aVF, with a maximal depression in leads V2 and V3. In addition, tall R waves are seen in leads V1 and V2 and Q waves are seen in the lateral leads I and aVL accompanied by ST elevation in aVL. In a patient with severe persistent chest pain, this suggests a posterolateral infarct. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded second obtuse marginal branch.
ST-segment depression that is most prominent in leads V1 through V3 often indicates posterior STEMI rather than non–ST-segment elevation ischemia and indicates the need for emergency revascularization. In fact, in the setting of posterior infarction, leads V1, V2, and V3 predominate as the areas of maximum depression, whereas greater ST-segment depression in the lateral precordial leads (V4, V5, and V6) or inferior leads (II, III, and aVF) is more indicative of nonocclusive and nonregional subendocardial ischemia (Figure 5).8,16–18

In most cases of posterior infarction, the posterior chest leads V7, V8, and V9 reveal ST-segment elevation.19 One study found that ST-segment depression in the anterior precordial leads was as sensitive as ST-segment elevation in leads V7 through V9 in identifying posterior myocardial infarction (sensitivity 80%),20 while other studies found that ST-segment deviation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography has a lower sensitivity (about 60%) in identifying posterior infarction.18,21

Tall or wide (≥ 0.04-s) R waves in leads V1 or V2, particularly when associated with upright T waves, suggest posterior infarction and may further corroborate this diagnosis, but this finding may take up to 24 hours to manifest and is seen in only about 50% of patients with posterior infarction.21

Studies have shown that ST-segment elevation on standard 12-lead electrocardiography is found in fewer than 50% of patients with acute left circumflex occlusion and inferoposterior infarction,18 yet these are cases of “missed” STEMI that indeed benefit from emergency angiography and reperfusion. In addition, studies of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome consistently identify patients who have epicardial vessel occlusion (about 15%–20% of cases),18 yet their initial angiography is usually delayed for hours or days after the initial presentation.

A subgroup analysis from TRITON–TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38) evaluated patients with isolated anterior ST-segment depression. An occluded “culprit” artery was found 26% of the time, most often the left circumflex artery. Moreover, those patients had a significantly higher rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30-day follow-up than patients without a culprit artery, probably related to delayed revascularization.22

Recognizing that ST-segment depression that is greatest in leads V1, V2, or V3 represents posterior infarction helps identify a portion of the missed STEMIs in a timely fashion. In addition, in cases of anterior ST-segment depression and in cases of chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiography, the recording of ST elevation in leads V7, V8, and V9 is highly sensitive for detecting a true posterior injury.

 

 

Acute pulmonary embolism

An anterior ischemic pattern of symmetric T-wave inversion in the precordial leads V1 through V4 may also be a sign of acute or chronic right ventricular strain, particularly acute pulmonary embolism. Sinus tachycardia is usually present, but other signs of pulmonary embolism, such as right ventricular hypertrophy and right bundle branch block, may be absent. In fact, T-wave inversion in leads V1 through V4 is noted in 19% of patients with nonmassive pulmonary embolism and in 85% of patients with massive pulmonary embolism, and is the most sensitive and specific electrocardiographic finding in massive pulmonary embolism.23

In addition, acute pulmonary embolism may be associated with T-wave inversion in leads III and aVF,24 and changes of concomitant anterior and inferior ischemia should always raise the question of this diagnosis.

In one retrospective study of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, nonspecific ST-segment or T-wave changes were the most common finding on electrocardiography, noted in 49%.25 Rapid regression of these changes on serial tracings favors pulmonary embolism rather than myocardial infarction.

ST-segment depression reciprocal to a subtle ST-segment elevation

When ST-segment elevation occurs in two contiguous standard leads while ST-segment depression occurs in other leads, and when the ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities are ischemic rather than secondary to depolarization abnormalities, ST-segment elevation is considered the primary ischemic abnormality whereas ST-segment depression is often considered a reciprocal “mirror image” change. This “reciprocal” change may also represent remote ischemia in a distant territory in patients with multivessel coronary disease.26,27

Reciprocal ST-segment depression is present in all patients with inferior myocardial infarction and in 70% of patients with anterior myocardial infarction.28

Figure 6. Example of subtle ST-segment elevation in two contiguous leads with a prominent ST-segment depression in other leads. The ST segment is depressed in leads I and aVL and V4, V5, and V6. There is a subtle ST-segment elevation with a broad hyperacute T wave in leads III and aVF fused with the ST segment in a convex fashion (arrows), suggesting that the primary abnormality is actually an acute inferior injury. Coronary arteriography showed a totally occluded right coronary artery in its mid-segment and severe left circumflex disease. The ST-segment depression is partly reciprocal to the inferior injury and partly a reflection of left circumflex-related ischemia.
However, it is important to recognize that the magnitude of ST-segment elevation and reciprocal ST-segment depression is affected by the distance of the leads recording these changes from the ischemic region and their angle of deviation from the ischemic region.29 This explains why occasionally—and particularly when the overall amplitude of the QRS complex is low—the magnitude of ST-segment elevation is small, whereas the reciprocal ST-segment depression is more prominent. In fact, in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block, the reciprocal ST-segment depression should be sought. It is of great utility in patients with acute cardiac symptoms and mild elevation of ST segments of 1 to 1.5 mm in two contiguous leads, as it strongly suggests the diagnosis of STEMI rather than other causes of mild ST-segment elevation (1–1.5 mm) (Figure 6).30 The less-pronounced ST-segment elevation is often overlooked, and the patient is erroneously diagnosed with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome rather than STEMI. This has a marked impact on patient management, as STEMI requires emergency revascularization, while non–ST-segment elevation ischemia requires early (but not emergency) coronary angiography.

Hypokalemia and digitalis effect

Figure 7. (A) Note the progressive flattening of the T wave, increase in U wave amplitude, and depression of the ST segment with progressive levels of hypokalemia (serum potassium levels are expressed in mEq/L). (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with a serum potassium level of 2.8 mEq/L. Note the flattened T waves (bars) and the prominent U waves (arrows).
ST-segment depression, T-wave flattening, and prominent U waves are the hallmarks of hypokalemia and can be mistaken for ischemic changes, including ischemic lengthening of the QT interval (Figure 7).31–34 Digitalis also produces ST-segment depression, low or inverted T waves, and prominent U waves, but the U waves rarely are of the giant variety seen with severe hypokalemia, and the ST-segment depression has a sagging shape. In addition, digitalis shortens the QT interval.

DIFFUSE (GLOBAL) T-WAVE INVERSION

Reproduced with permission from Glancy DL, et al. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:81–82.
Figure 8. Global T-wave inversion with marked QT prolongation in a 77-year-old woman presenting with dyspnea and elevated cardiac biomarkers. Her coronary arteriography showed a 90% distal left main stenosis extending into the proximal left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries.
This term is applied when the T wave is inverted in most of the standard leads except aVR, which shows a reciprocal upright T wave. The QT interval is often prolonged, and T-wave inversion is often symmetric and “giant” (> 10 mm) (Figure 8).1,35

Walder and Spodick36 have found this pattern to be caused most often by myocardial ischemia or neurologic events, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, and it seems more prevalent in women. Other causes include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress-induced cardiomyopathy (takotsubo cardiomyopathy), cocaine abuse, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, and advanced or complete atrioventricular block.36,37

The prognosis in patients with global T-wave inversion is determined by the underlying disease, and the striking T-wave changes per se do not imply a poor prognosis.38

Figure 9. (A) Persistent juvenile T-wave pattern in a 40-year-old woman with T-wave inversion extending from lead V1 to lead V4. The depth of the inverted T waves decreases between V1 and V4. Also, the T wave progressively becomes less deeply inverted as the patient ages. (B) Normal variant terminal T-wave inversion with ST-segment elevation in leads V2 through V5 in a 21-year-old black man. This pattern is most often seen in young black men, a few of whom at other times manifest the typical early repolarization pattern. The age and clinical presentation distinguish this pattern from Wellens-type T waves.
Of note, takotsubo cardiomyopathy is characterized by electrocardiographic changes that mimic ischemia, especially STEMI, and is often impossible to differentiate from myocardial ischemia related to a coronary event without performing coronary arteriography. The most common abnormality on the admission electrocardiogram is ST-segment elevation (present in 46%–100% of patients), typically seen in the precordial leads. Within 48 hours of presentation, almost all patients also develop postischemic diffuse T-wave inversion and prolongation of the QT interval. New Q waves may be seen in 6% to 31% of patients and are usually transient.39,40

OTHER CAUSES OF T-WAVE INVERSION OR ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION

Various other entities may cause T-wave inversion, notably acute pericarditis or myocarditis, 41,42 memory T-wave phenomenon,43,44 and normal variants of repolarization (Table 1, Figure 9).45 Additionally, a nonpathologic junctional ST-segment depression may be seen in tachycardia (Figure 10).

Figure 10. (A) Up-sloping ST-segment depression in a case of sinus tachycardia. This is related to the exaggerated atrial repolarization that occurs during tachycardia and depresses the PR segment and the initial portion of the ST-segment when compared with the TP segment. (B) Electrocardiogram of a patient with sinus tachycardia and junctional ST-segment depression in leads II and V4 through V6. It has no pathologic significance.

References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial ischemia. In: Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:194207.
  3. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:E1E211.
  4. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, et al; LIFE Study Investigators. Electrocardiographic strain pattern and prediction of new-onset congestive heart failure in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. Circulation 2006; 113:6773.
  5. Huwez FU, Pringle SD, Macfarlane PW. Variable patterns of ST-T abnormalities in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J 1992; 67:304307.
  6. Li D, Li CY, Yong AC, Kilpatrick D. Source of electrocardiographic ST changes in subendocardial ischemia. Circ Res 1998; 82:957970.
  7. Gorgels AP, Vos MA, Mulleneers R, de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72:9991003.
  8. Glancy DL. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J La State Med Soc 2002; 154:6675.
  9. Yamaji H, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, et al. Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:13481354.
  10. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1982; 103:730736.
  11. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Janssen JH, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am Heart J 1989; 117:657665.
  12. Lilaonitkul M, Robinson K, Roberts M. Wellens’ syndrome: significance of ECG pattern recognition in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2009; 26:750751.
  13. Glancy DL, Khuri B, Cospolich B. Heed the warning: Wellens’ type T-wave inversion is caused by proximal left anterior descending lesion. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2000; 13:416418.
  14. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999; 281:707713.
  15. Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Perach W, Perruchoud AP, Buettner HJ. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with very early revascularization. Am J Med 2004; 117:145150.
  16. Boden WE, Spodick DH. Diagnostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:358361.
  17. Shah A, Wagner GS, Green CL, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of the ST-segment depression of acute myocardial injury due to the left circumflex artery occlusion from that of myocardial ischemia of nonocclusive etiologies. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:512513.
  18. Krishnaswamy A, Lincoff AM, Menon V. Magnitude and consequences of missing the acute infarct-related circumflex artery. Am Heart J 2009; 158:706712.
  19. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Feinberg MS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: “hidden” ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:748753.
  20. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506511.
  21. Huey BL, Beller GA, Kaiser DL, Gibson RS. A comprehensive analysis of myocardial infarction due to left circumflex artery occlusion: comparison with infarction due to right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:11561166.
  22. Gibson CM, Pride YB, Mohanavelu S, Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Abstract 1999: Angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting with isolated anterior ST-segment depressions. Circulation 2008; 118:S–654.
  23. Ferrari E, Imbert A, Chevalier T, Mihoubi A, Morand P, Baudouy M. The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads—80 case reports. Chest 1997; 111:537543.
  24. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298303.
  25. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991; 100:598603.
  26. Norell MS, Lyons JP, Gardener JE, Layton CA, Balcon R. Significance of “reciprocal” ST segment depression: left ventriculographic observations during left anterior descending coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:12701274.
  27. Haraphongse M, Tanomsup S, Jugdutt BI. Inferior ST segment depression during acute anterior myocardial infarction: clinical and angiographic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4:467476.
  28. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Acute ischemia: electrocardiographic patterns. In: Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:122153.
  29. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:10031011.
  30. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Syverud SA, et al. Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:3538.
  31. Surawicz B. Electrolytes and the electrocardiogram. Postgrad Med 1974; 55:123129.
  32. Diercks DB, Shumaik GM, Harrigan RA, Brady WJ, Chan TC. Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities. J Emerg Med 2004; 27:153160.
  33. Glancy DL, Wang WL. ECG of the month. Abnormal electrocardiogram in a woman with a urinary tract infection. Sinus rhythm, rate 82/minute. Sagging ST segments, low T waves, and prominent U waves suggest hypokalemia. J La State Med Soc 2007; 159:57.
  34. Surawicz B, Braun HA, Crum WB, Kemp RL, Wagner S, Bellet S. Quantitative analysis of the electrocardiographic pattern of hypopotassemia. Circulation 1957; 16:750763.
  35. Glancy DL, Rochon BJ, Ilie CC, Parker JM, Jones MB, Atluri P. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:8182.
  36. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:14791485.
  37. Lui CY. Acute pulmonary embolism as the cause of global T wave inversion and QT prolongation. A case report. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26:9195.
  38. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion: long-term followup. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:16521656.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858865.
  40. Wittstein IS, Thiemann DR, Lima JA, et al. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:539548.
  41. Spodick DH. Electrocardiogram in acute pericarditis. Distributions of morphologic and axial changes by stages. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33:470474.
  42. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876890.
  43. Rosenbaum MB, Blanco HH, Elizari MV, Lázzari JO, Davidenko JM. Electrotonic modulation of the T wave and cardiac memory. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50:213222.
  44. Paparella N, Ouyang F, Fuca G, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Alboni P. Significance of newly acquired negative T waves after interruption of paroxysmal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia with narrow QRS complex. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:261263.
  45. Kaid KA, Maqsood A, Cohen M, Rothfeld E. Further characterization of the “persistent juvenile T-wave pattern” in adults. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41:644645.
References
  1. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:982991.
  2. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial ischemia. In: Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:194207.
  3. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:E1E211.
  4. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, et al; LIFE Study Investigators. Electrocardiographic strain pattern and prediction of new-onset congestive heart failure in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. Circulation 2006; 113:6773.
  5. Huwez FU, Pringle SD, Macfarlane PW. Variable patterns of ST-T abnormalities in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J 1992; 67:304307.
  6. Li D, Li CY, Yong AC, Kilpatrick D. Source of electrocardiographic ST changes in subendocardial ischemia. Circ Res 1998; 82:957970.
  7. Gorgels AP, Vos MA, Mulleneers R, de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72:9991003.
  8. Glancy DL. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J La State Med Soc 2002; 154:6675.
  9. Yamaji H, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, et al. Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:13481354.
  10. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1982; 103:730736.
  11. de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Janssen JH, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am Heart J 1989; 117:657665.
  12. Lilaonitkul M, Robinson K, Roberts M. Wellens’ syndrome: significance of ECG pattern recognition in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2009; 26:750751.
  13. Glancy DL, Khuri B, Cospolich B. Heed the warning: Wellens’ type T-wave inversion is caused by proximal left anterior descending lesion. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2000; 13:416418.
  14. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999; 281:707713.
  15. Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Perach W, Perruchoud AP, Buettner HJ. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with very early revascularization. Am J Med 2004; 117:145150.
  16. Boden WE, Spodick DH. Diagnostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:358361.
  17. Shah A, Wagner GS, Green CL, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of the ST-segment depression of acute myocardial injury due to the left circumflex artery occlusion from that of myocardial ischemia of nonocclusive etiologies. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:512513.
  18. Krishnaswamy A, Lincoff AM, Menon V. Magnitude and consequences of missing the acute infarct-related circumflex artery. Am Heart J 2009; 158:706712.
  19. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Feinberg MS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: “hidden” ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:748753.
  20. Matetzky S, Freimark D, Chouraqui P, et al. Significance of ST segment elevations in posterior chest leads (V7 to V9) in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction: application for thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:506511.
  21. Huey BL, Beller GA, Kaiser DL, Gibson RS. A comprehensive analysis of myocardial infarction due to left circumflex artery occlusion: comparison with infarction due to right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:11561166.
  22. Gibson CM, Pride YB, Mohanavelu S, Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Abstract 1999: Angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting with isolated anterior ST-segment depressions. Circulation 2008; 118:S–654.
  23. Ferrari E, Imbert A, Chevalier T, Mihoubi A, Morand P, Baudouy M. The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads—80 case reports. Chest 1997; 111:537543.
  24. Sreeram N, Cheriex EC, Smeets JL, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:298303.
  25. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991; 100:598603.
  26. Norell MS, Lyons JP, Gardener JE, Layton CA, Balcon R. Significance of “reciprocal” ST segment depression: left ventriculographic observations during left anterior descending coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:12701274.
  27. Haraphongse M, Tanomsup S, Jugdutt BI. Inferior ST segment depression during acute anterior myocardial infarction: clinical and angiographic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4:467476.
  28. Surawicz B, Knilans TK. Acute ischemia: electrocardiographic patterns. In: Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001:122153.
  29. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:10031011.
  30. Brady WJ, Perron AD, Syverud SA, et al. Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:3538.
  31. Surawicz B. Electrolytes and the electrocardiogram. Postgrad Med 1974; 55:123129.
  32. Diercks DB, Shumaik GM, Harrigan RA, Brady WJ, Chan TC. Electrocardiographic manifestations: electrolyte abnormalities. J Emerg Med 2004; 27:153160.
  33. Glancy DL, Wang WL. ECG of the month. Abnormal electrocardiogram in a woman with a urinary tract infection. Sinus rhythm, rate 82/minute. Sagging ST segments, low T waves, and prominent U waves suggest hypokalemia. J La State Med Soc 2007; 159:57.
  34. Surawicz B, Braun HA, Crum WB, Kemp RL, Wagner S, Bellet S. Quantitative analysis of the electrocardiographic pattern of hypopotassemia. Circulation 1957; 16:750763.
  35. Glancy DL, Rochon BJ, Ilie CC, Parker JM, Jones MB, Atluri P. Global T-wave inversion in a 77-year-old woman. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22:8182.
  36. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:14791485.
  37. Lui CY. Acute pulmonary embolism as the cause of global T wave inversion and QT prolongation. A case report. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26:9195.
  38. Walder LA, Spodick DH. Global T wave inversion: long-term followup. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:16521656.
  39. Bybee KA, Kara T, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review: transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a syndrome that mimics ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:858865.
  40. Wittstein IS, Thiemann DR, Lima JA, et al. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:539548.
  41. Spodick DH. Electrocardiogram in acute pericarditis. Distributions of morphologic and axial changes by stages. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33:470474.
  42. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation 2006; 113:876890.
  43. Rosenbaum MB, Blanco HH, Elizari MV, Lázzari JO, Davidenko JM. Electrotonic modulation of the T wave and cardiac memory. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50:213222.
  44. Paparella N, Ouyang F, Fuca G, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Alboni P. Significance of newly acquired negative T waves after interruption of paroxysmal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia with narrow QRS complex. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:261263.
  45. Kaid KA, Maqsood A, Cohen M, Rothfeld E. Further characterization of the “persistent juvenile T-wave pattern” in adults. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41:644645.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 78(6)
Page Number
404-414
Page Number
404-414
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion: Classification, differential diagnosis, and caveats
Display Headline
ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion: Classification, differential diagnosis, and caveats
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • ST-T abnormalities concordant to the QRS complex suggest ischemia.
  • Deep T-wave inversion or positive-negative biphasic T waves in the anterior precordial leads reflect severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.
  • Two particular patterns of ST-segment depression reflect ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction rather than non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: ST-segment depression that is reciprocal to a subtle and sometimes overlooked ST-segment elevation, and ST-segment depression that is maximal in leads V1–V3, suggesting true posterior infarction.
  • T-wave inversion in the anterior precordial leads may be seen in cases of acute pulmonary embolism, while flattened T waves with prominent U waves and ST-segment depression may reflect hypokalemia or digitalis therapy.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media