Allowed Publications
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of a rectovaginal endometriotic nodule

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:09
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of a rectovaginal endometriotic nodule
A review of key anatomy and a stepwise demonstration of technique

A rectovaginal endometriosis (RVE) is the most severe form of endometriosis. The gold standard for diagnosis is laparoscopy with histologic confirmation. A review of the literature suggests that surgery improves up to 70% of symptoms with generally favorable outcomes.

In this video, we provide a general introduction to endometriosis and a discussion of disease treatment options, ranging from hormonal suppression to radical bowel resections. We also illustrate the steps in robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of an RVE nodule:

  1. identify the borders of the rectosigmoid
  2. dissect the pararectal spaces  
  3. release the rectosigmoid from its attachment to the RVE nodule
  4. identify and isolate the ureter(s)
  5. determine the margins of the nodule  
  6. ensure complete resection.

Excision of an RVE nodule is a technically challenging surgical procedure. Use of the robot for resection is safe and feasible when performed by a trained and experienced surgeon.

I am pleased to bring you this video, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice. 

>> Arnold P. Advincula, MD

 

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Assistant Attending, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Simpson is Assistant Professor, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CooperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Issue
OBG Management - 29(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
42
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Assistant Attending, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Simpson is Assistant Professor, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CooperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Assistant Attending, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Simpson is Assistant Professor, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CooperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Article PDF
Article PDF
A review of key anatomy and a stepwise demonstration of technique
A review of key anatomy and a stepwise demonstration of technique

A rectovaginal endometriosis (RVE) is the most severe form of endometriosis. The gold standard for diagnosis is laparoscopy with histologic confirmation. A review of the literature suggests that surgery improves up to 70% of symptoms with generally favorable outcomes.

In this video, we provide a general introduction to endometriosis and a discussion of disease treatment options, ranging from hormonal suppression to radical bowel resections. We also illustrate the steps in robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of an RVE nodule:

  1. identify the borders of the rectosigmoid
  2. dissect the pararectal spaces  
  3. release the rectosigmoid from its attachment to the RVE nodule
  4. identify and isolate the ureter(s)
  5. determine the margins of the nodule  
  6. ensure complete resection.

Excision of an RVE nodule is a technically challenging surgical procedure. Use of the robot for resection is safe and feasible when performed by a trained and experienced surgeon.

I am pleased to bring you this video, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice. 

>> Arnold P. Advincula, MD

 

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

A rectovaginal endometriosis (RVE) is the most severe form of endometriosis. The gold standard for diagnosis is laparoscopy with histologic confirmation. A review of the literature suggests that surgery improves up to 70% of symptoms with generally favorable outcomes.

In this video, we provide a general introduction to endometriosis and a discussion of disease treatment options, ranging from hormonal suppression to radical bowel resections. We also illustrate the steps in robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of an RVE nodule:

  1. identify the borders of the rectosigmoid
  2. dissect the pararectal spaces  
  3. release the rectosigmoid from its attachment to the RVE nodule
  4. identify and isolate the ureter(s)
  5. determine the margins of the nodule  
  6. ensure complete resection.

Excision of an RVE nodule is a technically challenging surgical procedure. Use of the robot for resection is safe and feasible when performed by a trained and experienced surgeon.

I am pleased to bring you this video, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice. 

>> Arnold P. Advincula, MD

 

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Issue
OBG Management - 29(4)
Issue
OBG Management - 29(4)
Page Number
42
Page Number
42
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of a rectovaginal endometriotic nodule
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of a rectovaginal endometriotic nodule
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a noncommunicating cavitary rudimentary horn

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:08
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a noncommunicating cavitary rudimentary horn
Robotic surgery is a safe and feasible option for managing this mullerian duct anomaly

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Minimally Invasive Gynecology Fellow/Assistant Attending at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Rackow is Director, Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Program in the Departments of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility and Gynecologic Surgery at Columbia University Medical Center.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CopperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Issue
OBG Management - 29(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
51
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Minimally Invasive Gynecology Fellow/Assistant Attending at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Rackow is Director, Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Program in the Departments of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility and Gynecologic Surgery at Columbia University Medical Center.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CopperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is Minimally Invasive Gynecology Fellow/Assistant Attending at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Dr. Rackow is Director, Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Program in the Departments of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility and Gynecologic Surgery at Columbia University Medical Center.

Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Intuitive Surgical and Titan Medical and having additional financial relationships with Applied Medical, ConMed, and CopperSurgical. The other authors report no relevant financial relationships relevant to this video.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Robotic surgery is a safe and feasible option for managing this mullerian duct anomaly
Robotic surgery is a safe and feasible option for managing this mullerian duct anomaly

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

 

Vidyard Video

 

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Issue
OBG Management - 29(1)
Issue
OBG Management - 29(1)
Page Number
51
Page Number
51
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a noncommunicating cavitary rudimentary horn
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a noncommunicating cavitary rudimentary horn
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Laparoscopic salpingectomy and cornual resection repurposed

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:07
Display Headline
Laparoscopic salpingectomy and cornual resection repurposed

I am pleased to introduce this month’s video, from the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) at Penn State. Dr. Michelle Pacis addresses an increasingly important topic to MIGS surgeons: removal of previously hysteroscopically placed tubal occlusion devices. These devices offer a permanent alterative to laparoscopic sterilization. If women require their removal, however, whether desired or because of complications, gynecologic surgeons must be familiar with the steps involved.

The following video was produced in order to demonstrate a reproducible technique for laparoscopic removal of a device for women requesting this procedure. Key objectives of the video include:

  1. review of the techniques available to remove hysteroscopic tubal occlusion devices, as well as the contraindications and advantages/disadvantages of these approaches.
  2. discuss recommended imaging and materials required for the technique described and tips for their use.
  3. demonstrate salpingectomy and repair technique.

I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

 

Vidyard Video


 

Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Pacis is Fellow, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Dr. Advincula is Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health; Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women; and Medical Director, Simulation Center, Columbia University Medical Center. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Pacis reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.
Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

Issue
OBG Management - 28(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
52
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Pacis is Fellow, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Dr. Advincula is Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health; Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women; and Medical Director, Simulation Center, Columbia University Medical Center. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Pacis reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.
Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Pacis is Fellow, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Dr. Advincula is Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health; Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women; and Medical Director, Simulation Center, Columbia University Medical Center. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Dr. Pacis reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.
Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

I am pleased to introduce this month’s video, from the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) at Penn State. Dr. Michelle Pacis addresses an increasingly important topic to MIGS surgeons: removal of previously hysteroscopically placed tubal occlusion devices. These devices offer a permanent alterative to laparoscopic sterilization. If women require their removal, however, whether desired or because of complications, gynecologic surgeons must be familiar with the steps involved.

The following video was produced in order to demonstrate a reproducible technique for laparoscopic removal of a device for women requesting this procedure. Key objectives of the video include:

  1. review of the techniques available to remove hysteroscopic tubal occlusion devices, as well as the contraindications and advantages/disadvantages of these approaches.
  2. discuss recommended imaging and materials required for the technique described and tips for their use.
  3. demonstrate salpingectomy and repair technique.

I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

 

Vidyard Video


 

Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com

I am pleased to introduce this month’s video, from the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) at Penn State. Dr. Michelle Pacis addresses an increasingly important topic to MIGS surgeons: removal of previously hysteroscopically placed tubal occlusion devices. These devices offer a permanent alterative to laparoscopic sterilization. If women require their removal, however, whether desired or because of complications, gynecologic surgeons must be familiar with the steps involved.

The following video was produced in order to demonstrate a reproducible technique for laparoscopic removal of a device for women requesting this procedure. Key objectives of the video include:

  1. review of the techniques available to remove hysteroscopic tubal occlusion devices, as well as the contraindications and advantages/disadvantages of these approaches.
  2. discuss recommended imaging and materials required for the technique described and tips for their use.
  3. demonstrate salpingectomy and repair technique.

I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

 

Vidyard Video


 

Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com

Issue
OBG Management - 28(7)
Issue
OBG Management - 28(7)
Page Number
52
Page Number
52
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Laparoscopic salpingectomy and cornual resection repurposed
Display Headline
Laparoscopic salpingectomy and cornual resection repurposed
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:07
Display Headline
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy

The management of symptomatic uterine fibroids in the patient desiring conservative surgical therapy can be challenging at times. The advent of robot-assisted laparoscopy has provided surgeons with an enabling tool and patients with the option for a minimally invasive approach to myomectomy.

This month’s video was produced in order to demonstrate a systematic approach to the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in patients who are candidates. The example case is removal of a 5-cm, intrauterine posterior myoma in a 39-year-old woman (G3P1021) with heavy menstrual bleeding who desires future fertility.

Key objectives of the video include:

  1. understanding the role of radiologic imaging as part of preoperative surgical planning
  2. recognizing the key robotic instruments and suture selected to perform the procedure
  3. discussing robot-specific techniques that facilitate fibroid enucleation and hysterotomy repair.

Also integrated into this video is the application of the ExCITE technique—a manual cold knife tissue extraction technique utilizing an extracorporeal semi-circle “C-incision” approach—for tissue extraction. This technique was featured in an earlier installment of the video channel.1

I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

 

 

Vidyard Video


 

Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. Truong M, Advincula A. Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple: the Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.
    Article PDF
    Author and Disclosure Information

    Video editor: Victoria M. Fratto, MD; Videographer: Caroline Key

     

    Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University, New York, New York. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

    Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

    Issue
    OBG Management - 28(4)
    Publications
    Topics
    Legacy Keywords
    Arnold P. Advincula MD, Victoria M. Fratto MD, Caroline Key, robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, contained extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, myoma, heavy menstrual bleeding, fibroid, radiologic imaging, fibroid enucleation, hysterotomy, ExCITE
    Sections
    Author and Disclosure Information

    Video editor: Victoria M. Fratto, MD; Videographer: Caroline Key

     

    Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University, New York, New York. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

    Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

    Author and Disclosure Information

    Video editor: Victoria M. Fratto, MD; Videographer: Caroline Key

     

    Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University, New York, New York. He serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

    Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, and Titan Medical.

    Article PDF
    Article PDF
    Related Articles

    The management of symptomatic uterine fibroids in the patient desiring conservative surgical therapy can be challenging at times. The advent of robot-assisted laparoscopy has provided surgeons with an enabling tool and patients with the option for a minimally invasive approach to myomectomy.

    This month’s video was produced in order to demonstrate a systematic approach to the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in patients who are candidates. The example case is removal of a 5-cm, intrauterine posterior myoma in a 39-year-old woman (G3P1021) with heavy menstrual bleeding who desires future fertility.

    Key objectives of the video include:

    1. understanding the role of radiologic imaging as part of preoperative surgical planning
    2. recognizing the key robotic instruments and suture selected to perform the procedure
    3. discussing robot-specific techniques that facilitate fibroid enucleation and hysterotomy repair.

    Also integrated into this video is the application of the ExCITE technique—a manual cold knife tissue extraction technique utilizing an extracorporeal semi-circle “C-incision” approach—for tissue extraction. This technique was featured in an earlier installment of the video channel.1

    I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

     

     

    Vidyard Video


     

    Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

    The management of symptomatic uterine fibroids in the patient desiring conservative surgical therapy can be challenging at times. The advent of robot-assisted laparoscopy has provided surgeons with an enabling tool and patients with the option for a minimally invasive approach to myomectomy.

    This month’s video was produced in order to demonstrate a systematic approach to the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in patients who are candidates. The example case is removal of a 5-cm, intrauterine posterior myoma in a 39-year-old woman (G3P1021) with heavy menstrual bleeding who desires future fertility.

    Key objectives of the video include:

    1. understanding the role of radiologic imaging as part of preoperative surgical planning
    2. recognizing the key robotic instruments and suture selected to perform the procedure
    3. discussing robot-specific techniques that facilitate fibroid enucleation and hysterotomy repair.

    Also integrated into this video is the application of the ExCITE technique—a manual cold knife tissue extraction technique utilizing an extracorporeal semi-circle “C-incision” approach—for tissue extraction. This technique was featured in an earlier installment of the video channel.1

    I hope that you find this month’s video helpful to your surgical practice.

     

     

    Vidyard Video


     

    Share your thoughts on this video! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

    References
    1. Truong M, Advincula A. Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple: the Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.
      References
      1. Truong M, Advincula A. Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple: the Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.
        Issue
        OBG Management - 28(4)
        Issue
        OBG Management - 28(4)
        Publications
        Publications
        Topics
        Article Type
        Display Headline
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy
        Display Headline
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy
        Legacy Keywords
        Arnold P. Advincula MD, Victoria M. Fratto MD, Caroline Key, robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, contained extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, myoma, heavy menstrual bleeding, fibroid, radiologic imaging, fibroid enucleation, hysterotomy, ExCITE
        Legacy Keywords
        Arnold P. Advincula MD, Victoria M. Fratto MD, Caroline Key, robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, contained extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, myoma, heavy menstrual bleeding, fibroid, radiologic imaging, fibroid enucleation, hysterotomy, ExCITE
        Sections
        Disallow All Ads
        Alternative CME
        Use ProPublica
        Article PDF Media

        ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation

        Article Type
        Changed
        Wed, 01/06/2021 - 10:04
        Display Headline
        ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation

        In November 2014, following concerns regarding the use of electromechanical, or power, morcellation, we published a surgical technique called the extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, or ExCITE, technique, as an alternative to contained tissue extraction during minimally invasive gynecologic procedures such as myomectomy and hysterectomy.1 This technique was developed to create a simple, reproducible, and minimally invasive approach to tissue extraction without the need for power morcellation. ExCITE is trainee-friendly and teachable.

        In this article, we will review the steps for successful execution of the ExCITE technique. In addition, we will describe how to create your own cost-effective simulation model for teaching, learning, and practicing this technique with a few simple materials found in any craft or grocery store. Simulation is essential. It helps to troubleshoot issues that may arise in an actual case and allows for learning and practicing of surgical techniques to improve the learning curve and efficiency in the operating room (OR).

        The model described here is viewable in the video, “The ExCITE technique, Part 2: Simulation made simple.” It is archived in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel, which also is accessible through the “multimedia” section of this Web site.

        ExCITE operative technique
        “Traditional” intracorporeal tissue extraction techniques use power morcellation without specimen containment. The specimen is grasped with a tenaculum and pulled through the device. The specimen is essentially peeled like an apple and results in long strips of tissue with both a “cut” and “noncut” or intact surface due to the way the blade incises the tissue (FIGURE 1). When performing extracorporeal tissue extraction, we are replicating essentially the same mechanism of tissue removal. With ExCITE, however, the specimen is contained, there is no power morcellator, and tissue extraction is performed manually (FIGURE 2).

        ©Joe Gorman for OBG Management
        FIGURE 1 Without the use of a power morcellator, uterine tissue can be removed minimally invasively by manually incising tissue using a C-incision. This approach results in a long strip of tissue—similar to coring an apple.

         

        FIGURE 2 Intracorporeal power morcellation vs extracorporeal manual tissue extraction

         

        The ExCITE technique can be broken down into 5 major steps:

        1.    specimen retrieval and containment
        2.    self-retaining retractor placement
        3.    creation of the C-incision
        4.    tissue extraction
        5.    fascial closure.

        1. Specimen retrieval and containment
        First, place the specimen in an endoscopic specimen retrieval bag. Extend the incision at the umbilicus, to approximately 2.5 to 3.5 cm (roughly 2 good fingerbreadths), and exteriorize the bag at the level of the umbilicus.

        2. Self-retaining retractor placement
        Next, place a small disposable self-retaining retractor, (we prefer the extra-small Alexis-O) inside the bag, which helps keep the bag in position at the umbilicus (FIGURE 3).

        FIGURE 3 Self-retaining retractor at the umbilicus Make the umbilical incision at least 2 fingerbreaths, or approximately 2.5- to 3.5-cm wide.

        Tip. When inserting the retractor, push it in all the way until the entire bottom ring is inside of the bag. This allows for the retractor ring to deploy. Allow some space between the specimen and the opening of the bag when placing the retractor. Do not pull the bag too tightly against the anterior abdominal wall as this may prevent the retractor ring from deploying fully and make the specimen extraction step more difficult.

        3. Creation of C-incision
        Grasp the specimen with a penetrating clamp (such as a tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamp) and pull the specimen flush against the incision and retractor. Use a #11 or #10 blade scalpel to create a reverse “C-incision,” with the clamp in your nondominant hand and the scalpel starting the C-incision from your nondominant side moving toward your dominant side. (The curve of the “C” faces your dominant side.)

        Tip. It is important to make your C-incision wide enough to get an adequate sized specimen strip through the umbilicus but not too wide (ie, too flush with the retractor), as this will decrease your workspace and increase the risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. It is helpful to hold the scalpel like a pencil and use a sawing-like motion rather than trying to advance the scalpel through the tissue in one motion.

        4. Tissue extraction
        Re-grasp the tissue flap, or “nub,” created by the C-incision with the penetrating clamp. While maintaining tension on the specimen, continue cutting with a sawing-like motion, using a reverse C coring technique, keeping one surface completely intact. (Generally this is the surface facing your nondominant side.) When cutting, the tissue becomes a strip, similar in appearance to when using a power morcellator. In fact, the technique is very similar to peeling an apple all the way around while trying to keep the skin of the fruit intact.

        Tip. Try to angle the scalpel slightly when cutting the tissue, especially at the curve of the C. In other words, keep the tip of the scalpel toward the center of the strip and the handle away from the center, angled closer to the abdominal wall. When achieving an adequate strip of tissue, often the specimen will start rolling (similar to power morcellation). If this occurs, “go with the roll” by modifying the C-coring incision to a half C and incising along the top part of the C repeatedly until the specimen stops rolling. At that point, complete the C. Be sure to re-grasp near the specimen base as you continue the procedure and as the strip gets longer to prevent premature breakage of the strip and for ease of maintaining tension.

        5. Fascial closure
        After the specimen is completely extracted, remove the self-retaining retractor and specimen bag. Close the fascia at the umbilical incision. We prefer to close the fascia with an 0-polysorb (absorbable) suture in a running fashion, but you may consider an interrupted closure or use delayed absorbable sutures such as polyglyconate/polydioxanone (maxon/PDS).

        Tip. To facilitate removal of the self-retaining retractor, pull on the specimen retrieval bag at one apex in order to collapse the retractor ring inside the bag. This allows removal of the bag and retractor simultaneously.

         

         

        Keys to success

        • Perfect the cutting technique; it is imperative to achieve tissue removal in long strip-like pieces for efficiency. Achieving the “saw cut” is like connecting the dots on a piece of paper with a pencil, where you try not to lift up the pencil (or the scalpel in this case). Rock the tissue back and forth with your nondominant hand and pull the specimen flush to the incision. This helps expose maximal surface area so you can continue to cut tissue pieces that are as large as possible. When rocking, move your dominant (cutting) and nondominant (holding the specimen with the tenaculum) hands in opposite directions.
        • Ensure that the appropriate amount of tissue is cut when performing the C-incision. If the tissue strip is too thick, it becomes hard to see and incise the tissue, especially as you come around the back curve of the C. Limited visualization will increase your risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. If the cut is too thick, angle the scalpel in to make the tissue strip thinner (ie, make a “V-like” incision into the noncut surface). If the tissue strip becomes small, do the opposite; instead of cutting at a diagonal toward the noncut surface, aim out from your last incision (“V-out”). You should re-grasp below the narrowed area of the strip in this case before continuing to cut to prevent premature breakage of the strip.
        • Maintain traction on the specimen. Keep it flush against the abdominal wall and the opening of the self-retaining rectractor. Use your finger to help “roll” the specimen when continuing the C-incision, if necessary. Maintaining traction will help avoid the need to use your finger.
        • If you cannot remove the tissue fully intact, reorient or resect, and move forward. When the tissue is not easily extractable, try to roll the specimen by pushing near or behind the junction of the cut surface and the specimen. This helps reorient the specimen and exposes more smooth, noncut surfaces so coring can continue. The strip of tissue may need to be completely incised at times. If this occurs, drop the specimen back into the bag, find a smoother surface, re-grasp, and begin the C-incision again.

        To view ExCITE performed in real-time during removal of an 8-cm, 130-g fibroid after a robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, access the video “The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique” at obgmanagement.com, found in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel.

        Building the ExCITE simulation model
        Creation of the ExCITE simulation model can be broken down into 4 simple steps: creating the self-retaining retractor, building the torso, preparing the specimen, and simulating the ExCITE technique.

        Supplies
        To complete all 4 steps, you will need several materials, all of which are easily accessible and easy to prepare for simulation (FIGURE 4).

         

        FIGURE 4 Supplies

         

         

        • 1 beef tongue (2−3 lb)
        • 1 pantyhose
        • 2 silicone rings (4−5 cm in diameter, such as those used as wrist bracelets for cancer awareness)
        • 1-gallon resealable (Ziploc) plastic bags
        • 8x12 cardboard/corrugated box (or plastic storage box)
        • duct or masking tape
        • instruments:
          – #11-blade (or your preference) scalpel
          – penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps)

        Note that beef tongue, given its muscular texture, closely mimics uterine tissue and therefore is used to represent the fibroid or uterus during simulation. Sometimes, a piece of beef tongue can be marbleized, or fatty, in which case it can simulate a degenerated fibroid. Beef tongue usually comes in one large piece, which could be suitable for up to 4 surgical exercises. The cost of a single tongue is approximately $20 to $30, so it averages about $5 to $7 per exercise/surgical trainee.

         

         

        1. Create the self-retaining retractor
        Supplies: pantyhose, 2 silicone rings

        A self-retaining retractor is tubular and made up of a thin plastic material that has a pliable ring on either end. The pantyhose is used to simulate the tubular plastic material, and the silicone bracelets serve as the ring ends of the retractor. The retractor should be large enough so that it does not slip through the incision.

        First, cut off the toe end of the pantyhose. Measure and cut a pantyhose strip to approximately 38 cm (15 in). Place one end of the pantyhose through the center of one of the silicone bracelets and wrap it around the edges of the bracelet. Make it as even as possible all the way around the ring. Roll the pantyhose over the bracelet twice more to secure it. Repeat these steps for the other end of the pantyhose to create the simulated self-retaining retractor (FIGURE 5).

         

        FIGURE 5 Simulated self-retaining retractor

        2. Build the torso
        Supplies: cardboard (ie, office paper box) or plastic box, scissors, duct tape

        Place the cardboard box upside down and cut a hole (approximately 2−3 cm wide) at the center of the box top (technically the bottom of the box) to simulate the umbilical incision. Cut another opening on either side of the box (large enough to fit a hand so that the specimen can be inserted inside the box). When performing the ExCITE technique, a constant upward traction is required. In order to keep the box from lifting off the table, tape the box to the table with masking or duct tape. Alternatively, place weights in the bottom of the inside of the box.

        3. Prepare the specimen
        Supplies: beef tongue, resealable plastic bag

        To simulate the contained fibroid or uterus, slice the beef tongue into 3 to 4 pieces (approximately 1-lb pieces) and place one piece of beef tongue inside the resealable plastic bag. Using the side opening in the box, place the bag with the specimen inside the box, and pull the bag through the “umbilical incision” hole, just as you would in a real case. When exteriorizing the bag, ensure some slack so the simulated self-retaining retractor can be placed inside the bag with the ring rolled over it (FIGURE 6).

        FIGURE 6 “Torso” box and placement of self-retaining retractor

         


         

         

        4. ExCITE technique simulation: Grasp, cut, extract
        Supplies: #11-blade scalpel, penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps).

        After exteriorizing the bag, place the self-retaining retractor inside the bag and roll the silicone ring until the retractor is flush with the anterior abdominal wall. Grab the specimen (beef tongue) inside the bag. Perform the ExCITE technique using the beef tongue and the simulated model to fully remove the specimen (FIGURE 7).

        FIGURE 7 Intact, extracted beef tongue specimen

        Ready, set, simulate
        There are many advantages to being able to teach and practice the ExCITE technique outside of the OR. Simulation helps the surgeon to better understand the nuances of tissue extraction in a risk-free environment, and it can improve efficiency in the OR. Building the simulation model as we have described is simple, quick, and inexpensive. We hope that this technique will add to your surgical armamentarium so that you can continue to provide your patients minimally invasive gynecologic surgical options. We recommend that you view both of our videos related to the ExCITE technique and its simulation model at obgmanagement.com, and soon you will be ready to teach or practice the ExCITE technique.


        Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

        References

        Reference

        1. Truong MD, Advincula AP. The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.

        Article PDF
        Author and Disclosure Information

        Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York.

        Dr. Truong is Assistant Professor and Director, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

        Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, SurgiQuest, Titan Medical and receiving royalties from CooperSurgical. Dr. Truong reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

        Issue
        OBG Management - 27(12)
        Publications
        Topics
        Page Number
        40-45
        Legacy Keywords
        Arnold P. Advincula MD, Mireille D. Truong MD, ExCITE, minimally invasive tissue extraction, simulation, extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, power morcellation, hysterectomy, myomectomy, cost-effective simulation model, self-retaining retractor
        Sections
        Author and Disclosure Information

        Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York.

        Dr. Truong is Assistant Professor and Director, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

        Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, SurgiQuest, Titan Medical and receiving royalties from CooperSurgical. Dr. Truong reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

        Author and Disclosure Information

        Dr. Advincula is the Levine Family Professor of Women’s Health and Vice-Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Chief of Gynecology, Sloane Hospital for Women at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York.

        Dr. Truong is Assistant Professor and Director, Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

        Dr. Advincula reports being a consultant to Blue Endo, CooperSurgical, Intuitive Surgical, SurgiQuest, Titan Medical and receiving royalties from CooperSurgical. Dr. Truong reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

        Article PDF
        Article PDF
        Related Articles

        In November 2014, following concerns regarding the use of electromechanical, or power, morcellation, we published a surgical technique called the extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, or ExCITE, technique, as an alternative to contained tissue extraction during minimally invasive gynecologic procedures such as myomectomy and hysterectomy.1 This technique was developed to create a simple, reproducible, and minimally invasive approach to tissue extraction without the need for power morcellation. ExCITE is trainee-friendly and teachable.

        In this article, we will review the steps for successful execution of the ExCITE technique. In addition, we will describe how to create your own cost-effective simulation model for teaching, learning, and practicing this technique with a few simple materials found in any craft or grocery store. Simulation is essential. It helps to troubleshoot issues that may arise in an actual case and allows for learning and practicing of surgical techniques to improve the learning curve and efficiency in the operating room (OR).

        The model described here is viewable in the video, “The ExCITE technique, Part 2: Simulation made simple.” It is archived in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel, which also is accessible through the “multimedia” section of this Web site.

        ExCITE operative technique
        “Traditional” intracorporeal tissue extraction techniques use power morcellation without specimen containment. The specimen is grasped with a tenaculum and pulled through the device. The specimen is essentially peeled like an apple and results in long strips of tissue with both a “cut” and “noncut” or intact surface due to the way the blade incises the tissue (FIGURE 1). When performing extracorporeal tissue extraction, we are replicating essentially the same mechanism of tissue removal. With ExCITE, however, the specimen is contained, there is no power morcellator, and tissue extraction is performed manually (FIGURE 2).

        ©Joe Gorman for OBG Management
        FIGURE 1 Without the use of a power morcellator, uterine tissue can be removed minimally invasively by manually incising tissue using a C-incision. This approach results in a long strip of tissue—similar to coring an apple.

         

        FIGURE 2 Intracorporeal power morcellation vs extracorporeal manual tissue extraction

         

        The ExCITE technique can be broken down into 5 major steps:

        1.    specimen retrieval and containment
        2.    self-retaining retractor placement
        3.    creation of the C-incision
        4.    tissue extraction
        5.    fascial closure.

        1. Specimen retrieval and containment
        First, place the specimen in an endoscopic specimen retrieval bag. Extend the incision at the umbilicus, to approximately 2.5 to 3.5 cm (roughly 2 good fingerbreadths), and exteriorize the bag at the level of the umbilicus.

        2. Self-retaining retractor placement
        Next, place a small disposable self-retaining retractor, (we prefer the extra-small Alexis-O) inside the bag, which helps keep the bag in position at the umbilicus (FIGURE 3).

        FIGURE 3 Self-retaining retractor at the umbilicus Make the umbilical incision at least 2 fingerbreaths, or approximately 2.5- to 3.5-cm wide.

        Tip. When inserting the retractor, push it in all the way until the entire bottom ring is inside of the bag. This allows for the retractor ring to deploy. Allow some space between the specimen and the opening of the bag when placing the retractor. Do not pull the bag too tightly against the anterior abdominal wall as this may prevent the retractor ring from deploying fully and make the specimen extraction step more difficult.

        3. Creation of C-incision
        Grasp the specimen with a penetrating clamp (such as a tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamp) and pull the specimen flush against the incision and retractor. Use a #11 or #10 blade scalpel to create a reverse “C-incision,” with the clamp in your nondominant hand and the scalpel starting the C-incision from your nondominant side moving toward your dominant side. (The curve of the “C” faces your dominant side.)

        Tip. It is important to make your C-incision wide enough to get an adequate sized specimen strip through the umbilicus but not too wide (ie, too flush with the retractor), as this will decrease your workspace and increase the risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. It is helpful to hold the scalpel like a pencil and use a sawing-like motion rather than trying to advance the scalpel through the tissue in one motion.

        4. Tissue extraction
        Re-grasp the tissue flap, or “nub,” created by the C-incision with the penetrating clamp. While maintaining tension on the specimen, continue cutting with a sawing-like motion, using a reverse C coring technique, keeping one surface completely intact. (Generally this is the surface facing your nondominant side.) When cutting, the tissue becomes a strip, similar in appearance to when using a power morcellator. In fact, the technique is very similar to peeling an apple all the way around while trying to keep the skin of the fruit intact.

        Tip. Try to angle the scalpel slightly when cutting the tissue, especially at the curve of the C. In other words, keep the tip of the scalpel toward the center of the strip and the handle away from the center, angled closer to the abdominal wall. When achieving an adequate strip of tissue, often the specimen will start rolling (similar to power morcellation). If this occurs, “go with the roll” by modifying the C-coring incision to a half C and incising along the top part of the C repeatedly until the specimen stops rolling. At that point, complete the C. Be sure to re-grasp near the specimen base as you continue the procedure and as the strip gets longer to prevent premature breakage of the strip and for ease of maintaining tension.

        5. Fascial closure
        After the specimen is completely extracted, remove the self-retaining retractor and specimen bag. Close the fascia at the umbilical incision. We prefer to close the fascia with an 0-polysorb (absorbable) suture in a running fashion, but you may consider an interrupted closure or use delayed absorbable sutures such as polyglyconate/polydioxanone (maxon/PDS).

        Tip. To facilitate removal of the self-retaining retractor, pull on the specimen retrieval bag at one apex in order to collapse the retractor ring inside the bag. This allows removal of the bag and retractor simultaneously.

         

         

        Keys to success

        • Perfect the cutting technique; it is imperative to achieve tissue removal in long strip-like pieces for efficiency. Achieving the “saw cut” is like connecting the dots on a piece of paper with a pencil, where you try not to lift up the pencil (or the scalpel in this case). Rock the tissue back and forth with your nondominant hand and pull the specimen flush to the incision. This helps expose maximal surface area so you can continue to cut tissue pieces that are as large as possible. When rocking, move your dominant (cutting) and nondominant (holding the specimen with the tenaculum) hands in opposite directions.
        • Ensure that the appropriate amount of tissue is cut when performing the C-incision. If the tissue strip is too thick, it becomes hard to see and incise the tissue, especially as you come around the back curve of the C. Limited visualization will increase your risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. If the cut is too thick, angle the scalpel in to make the tissue strip thinner (ie, make a “V-like” incision into the noncut surface). If the tissue strip becomes small, do the opposite; instead of cutting at a diagonal toward the noncut surface, aim out from your last incision (“V-out”). You should re-grasp below the narrowed area of the strip in this case before continuing to cut to prevent premature breakage of the strip.
        • Maintain traction on the specimen. Keep it flush against the abdominal wall and the opening of the self-retaining rectractor. Use your finger to help “roll” the specimen when continuing the C-incision, if necessary. Maintaining traction will help avoid the need to use your finger.
        • If you cannot remove the tissue fully intact, reorient or resect, and move forward. When the tissue is not easily extractable, try to roll the specimen by pushing near or behind the junction of the cut surface and the specimen. This helps reorient the specimen and exposes more smooth, noncut surfaces so coring can continue. The strip of tissue may need to be completely incised at times. If this occurs, drop the specimen back into the bag, find a smoother surface, re-grasp, and begin the C-incision again.

        To view ExCITE performed in real-time during removal of an 8-cm, 130-g fibroid after a robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, access the video “The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique” at obgmanagement.com, found in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel.

        Building the ExCITE simulation model
        Creation of the ExCITE simulation model can be broken down into 4 simple steps: creating the self-retaining retractor, building the torso, preparing the specimen, and simulating the ExCITE technique.

        Supplies
        To complete all 4 steps, you will need several materials, all of which are easily accessible and easy to prepare for simulation (FIGURE 4).

         

        FIGURE 4 Supplies

         

         

        • 1 beef tongue (2−3 lb)
        • 1 pantyhose
        • 2 silicone rings (4−5 cm in diameter, such as those used as wrist bracelets for cancer awareness)
        • 1-gallon resealable (Ziploc) plastic bags
        • 8x12 cardboard/corrugated box (or plastic storage box)
        • duct or masking tape
        • instruments:
          – #11-blade (or your preference) scalpel
          – penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps)

        Note that beef tongue, given its muscular texture, closely mimics uterine tissue and therefore is used to represent the fibroid or uterus during simulation. Sometimes, a piece of beef tongue can be marbleized, or fatty, in which case it can simulate a degenerated fibroid. Beef tongue usually comes in one large piece, which could be suitable for up to 4 surgical exercises. The cost of a single tongue is approximately $20 to $30, so it averages about $5 to $7 per exercise/surgical trainee.

         

         

        1. Create the self-retaining retractor
        Supplies: pantyhose, 2 silicone rings

        A self-retaining retractor is tubular and made up of a thin plastic material that has a pliable ring on either end. The pantyhose is used to simulate the tubular plastic material, and the silicone bracelets serve as the ring ends of the retractor. The retractor should be large enough so that it does not slip through the incision.

        First, cut off the toe end of the pantyhose. Measure and cut a pantyhose strip to approximately 38 cm (15 in). Place one end of the pantyhose through the center of one of the silicone bracelets and wrap it around the edges of the bracelet. Make it as even as possible all the way around the ring. Roll the pantyhose over the bracelet twice more to secure it. Repeat these steps for the other end of the pantyhose to create the simulated self-retaining retractor (FIGURE 5).

         

        FIGURE 5 Simulated self-retaining retractor

        2. Build the torso
        Supplies: cardboard (ie, office paper box) or plastic box, scissors, duct tape

        Place the cardboard box upside down and cut a hole (approximately 2−3 cm wide) at the center of the box top (technically the bottom of the box) to simulate the umbilical incision. Cut another opening on either side of the box (large enough to fit a hand so that the specimen can be inserted inside the box). When performing the ExCITE technique, a constant upward traction is required. In order to keep the box from lifting off the table, tape the box to the table with masking or duct tape. Alternatively, place weights in the bottom of the inside of the box.

        3. Prepare the specimen
        Supplies: beef tongue, resealable plastic bag

        To simulate the contained fibroid or uterus, slice the beef tongue into 3 to 4 pieces (approximately 1-lb pieces) and place one piece of beef tongue inside the resealable plastic bag. Using the side opening in the box, place the bag with the specimen inside the box, and pull the bag through the “umbilical incision” hole, just as you would in a real case. When exteriorizing the bag, ensure some slack so the simulated self-retaining retractor can be placed inside the bag with the ring rolled over it (FIGURE 6).

        FIGURE 6 “Torso” box and placement of self-retaining retractor

         


         

         

        4. ExCITE technique simulation: Grasp, cut, extract
        Supplies: #11-blade scalpel, penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps).

        After exteriorizing the bag, place the self-retaining retractor inside the bag and roll the silicone ring until the retractor is flush with the anterior abdominal wall. Grab the specimen (beef tongue) inside the bag. Perform the ExCITE technique using the beef tongue and the simulated model to fully remove the specimen (FIGURE 7).

        FIGURE 7 Intact, extracted beef tongue specimen

        Ready, set, simulate
        There are many advantages to being able to teach and practice the ExCITE technique outside of the OR. Simulation helps the surgeon to better understand the nuances of tissue extraction in a risk-free environment, and it can improve efficiency in the OR. Building the simulation model as we have described is simple, quick, and inexpensive. We hope that this technique will add to your surgical armamentarium so that you can continue to provide your patients minimally invasive gynecologic surgical options. We recommend that you view both of our videos related to the ExCITE technique and its simulation model at obgmanagement.com, and soon you will be ready to teach or practice the ExCITE technique.


        Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

        In November 2014, following concerns regarding the use of electromechanical, or power, morcellation, we published a surgical technique called the extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, or ExCITE, technique, as an alternative to contained tissue extraction during minimally invasive gynecologic procedures such as myomectomy and hysterectomy.1 This technique was developed to create a simple, reproducible, and minimally invasive approach to tissue extraction without the need for power morcellation. ExCITE is trainee-friendly and teachable.

        In this article, we will review the steps for successful execution of the ExCITE technique. In addition, we will describe how to create your own cost-effective simulation model for teaching, learning, and practicing this technique with a few simple materials found in any craft or grocery store. Simulation is essential. It helps to troubleshoot issues that may arise in an actual case and allows for learning and practicing of surgical techniques to improve the learning curve and efficiency in the operating room (OR).

        The model described here is viewable in the video, “The ExCITE technique, Part 2: Simulation made simple.” It is archived in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel, which also is accessible through the “multimedia” section of this Web site.

        ExCITE operative technique
        “Traditional” intracorporeal tissue extraction techniques use power morcellation without specimen containment. The specimen is grasped with a tenaculum and pulled through the device. The specimen is essentially peeled like an apple and results in long strips of tissue with both a “cut” and “noncut” or intact surface due to the way the blade incises the tissue (FIGURE 1). When performing extracorporeal tissue extraction, we are replicating essentially the same mechanism of tissue removal. With ExCITE, however, the specimen is contained, there is no power morcellator, and tissue extraction is performed manually (FIGURE 2).

        ©Joe Gorman for OBG Management
        FIGURE 1 Without the use of a power morcellator, uterine tissue can be removed minimally invasively by manually incising tissue using a C-incision. This approach results in a long strip of tissue—similar to coring an apple.

         

        FIGURE 2 Intracorporeal power morcellation vs extracorporeal manual tissue extraction

         

        The ExCITE technique can be broken down into 5 major steps:

        1.    specimen retrieval and containment
        2.    self-retaining retractor placement
        3.    creation of the C-incision
        4.    tissue extraction
        5.    fascial closure.

        1. Specimen retrieval and containment
        First, place the specimen in an endoscopic specimen retrieval bag. Extend the incision at the umbilicus, to approximately 2.5 to 3.5 cm (roughly 2 good fingerbreadths), and exteriorize the bag at the level of the umbilicus.

        2. Self-retaining retractor placement
        Next, place a small disposable self-retaining retractor, (we prefer the extra-small Alexis-O) inside the bag, which helps keep the bag in position at the umbilicus (FIGURE 3).

        FIGURE 3 Self-retaining retractor at the umbilicus Make the umbilical incision at least 2 fingerbreaths, or approximately 2.5- to 3.5-cm wide.

        Tip. When inserting the retractor, push it in all the way until the entire bottom ring is inside of the bag. This allows for the retractor ring to deploy. Allow some space between the specimen and the opening of the bag when placing the retractor. Do not pull the bag too tightly against the anterior abdominal wall as this may prevent the retractor ring from deploying fully and make the specimen extraction step more difficult.

        3. Creation of C-incision
        Grasp the specimen with a penetrating clamp (such as a tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamp) and pull the specimen flush against the incision and retractor. Use a #11 or #10 blade scalpel to create a reverse “C-incision,” with the clamp in your nondominant hand and the scalpel starting the C-incision from your nondominant side moving toward your dominant side. (The curve of the “C” faces your dominant side.)

        Tip. It is important to make your C-incision wide enough to get an adequate sized specimen strip through the umbilicus but not too wide (ie, too flush with the retractor), as this will decrease your workspace and increase the risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. It is helpful to hold the scalpel like a pencil and use a sawing-like motion rather than trying to advance the scalpel through the tissue in one motion.

        4. Tissue extraction
        Re-grasp the tissue flap, or “nub,” created by the C-incision with the penetrating clamp. While maintaining tension on the specimen, continue cutting with a sawing-like motion, using a reverse C coring technique, keeping one surface completely intact. (Generally this is the surface facing your nondominant side.) When cutting, the tissue becomes a strip, similar in appearance to when using a power morcellator. In fact, the technique is very similar to peeling an apple all the way around while trying to keep the skin of the fruit intact.

        Tip. Try to angle the scalpel slightly when cutting the tissue, especially at the curve of the C. In other words, keep the tip of the scalpel toward the center of the strip and the handle away from the center, angled closer to the abdominal wall. When achieving an adequate strip of tissue, often the specimen will start rolling (similar to power morcellation). If this occurs, “go with the roll” by modifying the C-coring incision to a half C and incising along the top part of the C repeatedly until the specimen stops rolling. At that point, complete the C. Be sure to re-grasp near the specimen base as you continue the procedure and as the strip gets longer to prevent premature breakage of the strip and for ease of maintaining tension.

        5. Fascial closure
        After the specimen is completely extracted, remove the self-retaining retractor and specimen bag. Close the fascia at the umbilical incision. We prefer to close the fascia with an 0-polysorb (absorbable) suture in a running fashion, but you may consider an interrupted closure or use delayed absorbable sutures such as polyglyconate/polydioxanone (maxon/PDS).

        Tip. To facilitate removal of the self-retaining retractor, pull on the specimen retrieval bag at one apex in order to collapse the retractor ring inside the bag. This allows removal of the bag and retractor simultaneously.

         

         

        Keys to success

        • Perfect the cutting technique; it is imperative to achieve tissue removal in long strip-like pieces for efficiency. Achieving the “saw cut” is like connecting the dots on a piece of paper with a pencil, where you try not to lift up the pencil (or the scalpel in this case). Rock the tissue back and forth with your nondominant hand and pull the specimen flush to the incision. This helps expose maximal surface area so you can continue to cut tissue pieces that are as large as possible. When rocking, move your dominant (cutting) and nondominant (holding the specimen with the tenaculum) hands in opposite directions.
        • Ensure that the appropriate amount of tissue is cut when performing the C-incision. If the tissue strip is too thick, it becomes hard to see and incise the tissue, especially as you come around the back curve of the C. Limited visualization will increase your risk of cutting the retractor or the bag. If the cut is too thick, angle the scalpel in to make the tissue strip thinner (ie, make a “V-like” incision into the noncut surface). If the tissue strip becomes small, do the opposite; instead of cutting at a diagonal toward the noncut surface, aim out from your last incision (“V-out”). You should re-grasp below the narrowed area of the strip in this case before continuing to cut to prevent premature breakage of the strip.
        • Maintain traction on the specimen. Keep it flush against the abdominal wall and the opening of the self-retaining rectractor. Use your finger to help “roll” the specimen when continuing the C-incision, if necessary. Maintaining traction will help avoid the need to use your finger.
        • If you cannot remove the tissue fully intact, reorient or resect, and move forward. When the tissue is not easily extractable, try to roll the specimen by pushing near or behind the junction of the cut surface and the specimen. This helps reorient the specimen and exposes more smooth, noncut surfaces so coring can continue. The strip of tissue may need to be completely incised at times. If this occurs, drop the specimen back into the bag, find a smoother surface, re-grasp, and begin the C-incision again.

        To view ExCITE performed in real-time during removal of an 8-cm, 130-g fibroid after a robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, access the video “The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique” at obgmanagement.com, found in Arnold Advincula’s Surgical Techniques Video Channel.

        Building the ExCITE simulation model
        Creation of the ExCITE simulation model can be broken down into 4 simple steps: creating the self-retaining retractor, building the torso, preparing the specimen, and simulating the ExCITE technique.

        Supplies
        To complete all 4 steps, you will need several materials, all of which are easily accessible and easy to prepare for simulation (FIGURE 4).

         

        FIGURE 4 Supplies

         

         

        • 1 beef tongue (2−3 lb)
        • 1 pantyhose
        • 2 silicone rings (4−5 cm in diameter, such as those used as wrist bracelets for cancer awareness)
        • 1-gallon resealable (Ziploc) plastic bags
        • 8x12 cardboard/corrugated box (or plastic storage box)
        • duct or masking tape
        • instruments:
          – #11-blade (or your preference) scalpel
          – penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps)

        Note that beef tongue, given its muscular texture, closely mimics uterine tissue and therefore is used to represent the fibroid or uterus during simulation. Sometimes, a piece of beef tongue can be marbleized, or fatty, in which case it can simulate a degenerated fibroid. Beef tongue usually comes in one large piece, which could be suitable for up to 4 surgical exercises. The cost of a single tongue is approximately $20 to $30, so it averages about $5 to $7 per exercise/surgical trainee.

         

         

        1. Create the self-retaining retractor
        Supplies: pantyhose, 2 silicone rings

        A self-retaining retractor is tubular and made up of a thin plastic material that has a pliable ring on either end. The pantyhose is used to simulate the tubular plastic material, and the silicone bracelets serve as the ring ends of the retractor. The retractor should be large enough so that it does not slip through the incision.

        First, cut off the toe end of the pantyhose. Measure and cut a pantyhose strip to approximately 38 cm (15 in). Place one end of the pantyhose through the center of one of the silicone bracelets and wrap it around the edges of the bracelet. Make it as even as possible all the way around the ring. Roll the pantyhose over the bracelet twice more to secure it. Repeat these steps for the other end of the pantyhose to create the simulated self-retaining retractor (FIGURE 5).

         

        FIGURE 5 Simulated self-retaining retractor

        2. Build the torso
        Supplies: cardboard (ie, office paper box) or plastic box, scissors, duct tape

        Place the cardboard box upside down and cut a hole (approximately 2−3 cm wide) at the center of the box top (technically the bottom of the box) to simulate the umbilical incision. Cut another opening on either side of the box (large enough to fit a hand so that the specimen can be inserted inside the box). When performing the ExCITE technique, a constant upward traction is required. In order to keep the box from lifting off the table, tape the box to the table with masking or duct tape. Alternatively, place weights in the bottom of the inside of the box.

        3. Prepare the specimen
        Supplies: beef tongue, resealable plastic bag

        To simulate the contained fibroid or uterus, slice the beef tongue into 3 to 4 pieces (approximately 1-lb pieces) and place one piece of beef tongue inside the resealable plastic bag. Using the side opening in the box, place the bag with the specimen inside the box, and pull the bag through the “umbilical incision” hole, just as you would in a real case. When exteriorizing the bag, ensure some slack so the simulated self-retaining retractor can be placed inside the bag with the ring rolled over it (FIGURE 6).

        FIGURE 6 “Torso” box and placement of self-retaining retractor

         


         

         

        4. ExCITE technique simulation: Grasp, cut, extract
        Supplies: #11-blade scalpel, penetrating clamps (tenaculum, Lahey, or towel clamps).

        After exteriorizing the bag, place the self-retaining retractor inside the bag and roll the silicone ring until the retractor is flush with the anterior abdominal wall. Grab the specimen (beef tongue) inside the bag. Perform the ExCITE technique using the beef tongue and the simulated model to fully remove the specimen (FIGURE 7).

        FIGURE 7 Intact, extracted beef tongue specimen

        Ready, set, simulate
        There are many advantages to being able to teach and practice the ExCITE technique outside of the OR. Simulation helps the surgeon to better understand the nuances of tissue extraction in a risk-free environment, and it can improve efficiency in the OR. Building the simulation model as we have described is simple, quick, and inexpensive. We hope that this technique will add to your surgical armamentarium so that you can continue to provide your patients minimally invasive gynecologic surgical options. We recommend that you view both of our videos related to the ExCITE technique and its simulation model at obgmanagement.com, and soon you will be ready to teach or practice the ExCITE technique.


        Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

        References

        Reference

        1. Truong MD, Advincula AP. The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.

        References

        Reference

        1. Truong MD, Advincula AP. The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction (ExCITE) technique. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11):56.

        Issue
        OBG Management - 27(12)
        Issue
        OBG Management - 27(12)
        Page Number
        40-45
        Page Number
        40-45
        Publications
        Publications
        Topics
        Article Type
        Display Headline
        ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation
        Display Headline
        ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation
        Legacy Keywords
        Arnold P. Advincula MD, Mireille D. Truong MD, ExCITE, minimally invasive tissue extraction, simulation, extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, power morcellation, hysterectomy, myomectomy, cost-effective simulation model, self-retaining retractor
        Legacy Keywords
        Arnold P. Advincula MD, Mireille D. Truong MD, ExCITE, minimally invasive tissue extraction, simulation, extracorporeal C-incision tissue extraction, power morcellation, hysterectomy, myomectomy, cost-effective simulation model, self-retaining retractor
        Sections
        Inside the Article

        In this Article

        • 5 steps to execute ExCITE
        • Keys to technique success
        • Building the simulation model

        The ExCITE technique, Part 2: Simulation made simple

        Disallow All Ads
        Alternative CME
        Use ProPublica
        Hide sidebar & use full width
        render the right sidebar.
        Conference Recap Checkbox
        Not Conference Recap
        Clinical Edge
        Display the Slideshow in this Article
        Medscape Article
        Article PDF Media