Neurology

A 74-year-old man presented to the gastroenterology clinic with a 2-day history of retrosternal discomfort. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory testing showed a normal leukocyte count.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed longitudinal sloughing mucosal casts in the middle and lower esophagus (Figure 1).

The patient had been taking dabigatran 110 mg twice daily for 2 years because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. He was also taking amlodipine 2.5 mg/day for hypertension.

DABIGATRAN-INDUCED ESOPHAGITIS

Although no study has investigated the overall prevalence of dabigatran-induced esophagitis, a retrospective database review of 91 patients taking dabigatran and undergoing upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy reported that 19 (20.9%) had endoscopic signs of dabigatran-induced esophagitis.²

Typical symptoms are the acute onset of chest pain, epigastralgia, odynophagia, and dysphagia. But patients can also have no symptoms or only mild symptoms.^2,3

Despite dabigatran’s anticoagulant activity, there have been few reports of bleeding, perhaps because  the lesions tend to be superficial on the surface of the esophageal mucosa.

Symptoms usually resolve within 1 week after stopping dabigatran and starting a proton pump inhibitor. To prevent mucosal injury, patients should be instructed to take dabigatran with sufficient water and to remain in an upright position for at least 30 minutes afterward.⁴

A 74-year-old man presented to the gastroenterology clinic with a 2-day history of retrosternal discomfort. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory testing showed a normal leukocyte count.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed longitudinal sloughing mucosal casts in the middle and lower esophagus (Figure 1).

The patient had been taking dabigatran 110 mg twice daily for 2 years because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. He was also taking amlodipine 2.5 mg/day for hypertension.

DABIGATRAN-INDUCED ESOPHAGITIS

Although no study has investigated the overall prevalence of dabigatran-induced esophagitis, a retrospective database review of 91 patients taking dabigatran and undergoing upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy reported that 19 (20.9%) had endoscopic signs of dabigatran-induced esophagitis.²

Typical symptoms are the acute onset of chest pain, epigastralgia, odynophagia, and dysphagia. But patients can also have no symptoms or only mild symptoms.^2,3

Despite dabigatran’s anticoagulant activity, there have been few reports of bleeding, perhaps because  the lesions tend to be superficial on the surface of the esophageal mucosa.

Symptoms usually resolve within 1 week after stopping dabigatran and starting a proton pump inhibitor. To prevent mucosal injury, patients should be instructed to take dabigatran with sufficient water and to remain in an upright position for at least 30 minutes afterward.⁴

A 74-year-old man presented to the gastroenterology clinic with a 2-day history of retrosternal discomfort. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory testing showed a normal leukocyte count.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed longitudinal sloughing mucosal casts in the middle and lower esophagus (Figure 1).

The patient had been taking dabigatran 110 mg twice daily for 2 years because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. He was also taking amlodipine 2.5 mg/day for hypertension.

DABIGATRAN-INDUCED ESOPHAGITIS

Although no study has investigated the overall prevalence of dabigatran-induced esophagitis, a retrospective database review of 91 patients taking dabigatran and undergoing upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy reported that 19 (20.9%) had endoscopic signs of dabigatran-induced esophagitis.²

Typical symptoms are the acute onset of chest pain, epigastralgia, odynophagia, and dysphagia. But patients can also have no symptoms or only mild symptoms.^2,3

Despite dabigatran’s anticoagulant activity, there have been few reports of bleeding, perhaps because  the lesions tend to be superficial on the surface of the esophageal mucosa.

Symptoms usually resolve within 1 week after stopping dabigatran and starting a proton pump inhibitor. To prevent mucosal injury, patients should be instructed to take dabigatran with sufficient water and to remain in an upright position for at least 30 minutes afterward.⁴

Here are 5 articles from the May issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Subclinical hypothyroidism boosts immediate risk of heart failure

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IK0YiL
Expires January 24, 2020

2. Meta-analysis supports aspirin to reduce cardiovascular events

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GJLgSB
Expires January 24, 2020

3. Age of migraine onset may affect stroke risk

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2ZAJ5YR
Expires January 24, 2020

4. Women with RA have reduced chance of live birth after assisted reproduction treatment

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2VvKRLF
Expires January 27, 2020

5. New SLE disease activity measure beats SLEDAI-2K

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2W8SVPA
Expires January 31, 2020

Here are 5 articles from the May issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Subclinical hypothyroidism boosts immediate risk of heart failure

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IK0YiL
Expires January 24, 2020

2. Meta-analysis supports aspirin to reduce cardiovascular events

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GJLgSB
Expires January 24, 2020

3. Age of migraine onset may affect stroke risk

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2ZAJ5YR
Expires January 24, 2020

4. Women with RA have reduced chance of live birth after assisted reproduction treatment

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2VvKRLF
Expires January 27, 2020

5. New SLE disease activity measure beats SLEDAI-2K

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2W8SVPA
Expires January 31, 2020

Here are 5 articles from the May issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Subclinical hypothyroidism boosts immediate risk of heart failure

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IK0YiL
Expires January 24, 2020

2. Meta-analysis supports aspirin to reduce cardiovascular events

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GJLgSB
Expires January 24, 2020

3. Age of migraine onset may affect stroke risk

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2ZAJ5YR
Expires January 24, 2020

4. Women with RA have reduced chance of live birth after assisted reproduction treatment

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2VvKRLF
Expires January 27, 2020

5. New SLE disease activity measure beats SLEDAI-2K

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2W8SVPA
Expires January 31, 2020

Unlike other organs in the human body, the brain is constantly changing. The main driver for this ongoing re-engineering across various neural circuits is “experiential neuroplasticity,” which creates billions of new synapses and dendrite spines as well as new connections. And as the brain reinvents itself from day to day, the mind evolves as well.

The neurobiologic re-sculpting of the brain’s complex innards continuously encodes memories of what we learn and experience during waking hours, including all that we see, hear, feel, think, contemplate, plan, and decide. However, in addition to the ongoing intrinsic neuroplasticity that records life’s experiences within neural circuits, there are many extrinsic factors that can further modify the brain and the “psyche” it generates via electrical, neurochemical, and physiological mechanisms. That’s why every patient a psychiatrist sees at follow-up visits will have a brain that will be different from the previous encounter.

Consider the following factors that can modify a patient’s brain (for better or worse) between sessions:

• Psychotherapy that the patient received at the last session will biologically modify his or her brain. Creating new insights and understanding of one’s behavior and “connecting the dots” of the past and present emotions and reactions are all associated with neuroplastic changes within the brain.
• Mood or psychotic episodes. Depressive, manic, or psychotic episodes are associated with neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic effects, which can disrupt the brain’s cytoarchitecture. That’s why psychiatrists must inquire about such episodes between visits and document the possible effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Psychotropic medications all bind to one or more brain receptors to exert therapeutic or adverse effects, both of which are associated with changes in neurotransmitter pathways. A key component of every follow-up visit is to gauge the risks and benefits of the pharmacotherapy prescribed at the prior visit.
• Nonpsychiatric prescription medications are often associated with iatrogenic effects on the brain apart from their intended target organs. These iatrogenic effects include anxiety, depression, mania, psychosis, and cognitive changes. That’s why during each visit, the physician or nurse practitioner must review all prescription medications and consider their potential effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Over-the-counter drugs and supplements may exert neurologic effects via histaminergic, muscarinic, glutamatergic, adrenergic, or serotonergic effects—all of which can alter brain chemistry and contribute to mental status changes. They can also inhibit or induce cytochrome enzymes and induce adverse effects or loss of efficacy of the primary psychotropic medication the patient takes.
• Medical illness, even as simple as an upper respiratory viral infection, can alter brain function due to illness-induced physiological aberrations, including pain and peripheral inflammation, with neurologic consequences. Common metabolic disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension can exert mental status changes.
• Alcohol and drugs of abuse alter brain structure and function and can induce psychological and cognitive changes. Inquiring about the amount and frequency of alcohol and recreational drug use must be done in detail at every visit.
• Stressful events. It is almost impossible for a psychiatric patient not to encounter stressful life events between visits. Coping with any mental disorder can be quite stressful and challenging due to its social, vocational, or personal consequences. Stress increases cortisol, which is associated with deleterious inflammatory effects on the brain. Persistent stress can lead to hippocampal atrophy because of the abundance of glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus. Inquiry about stressors must be part of every psychiatric follow-up visit. Multiple psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects are well known to be generated by stress, especially in individuals already impaired by mental illness.
• Diet. What a patient eats (or avoids eating) can affect the brain. High-fat diets can be inflammatory, while a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and nuts can be neuroprotective. The microbiota and the enteric brain—both in the gastrointestinal tract—have been reported to influence mood and behavior. (For more on this, see “Gut microbiota and its implications for psychiatry: A review of 3 studies” on page 40 and “It takes guts to be mentally ill: Microbiota and psychopathology,” From the Editor, Current Psychiatry, September 2018, p. 4-6.)
• Obesity is associated with brain atrophy as well as depression. Weight should be assessed at every visit and coupled with counseling about diet and exercise.
• Exercise, or the lack of it, can alter the brain in good or bad ways. Many studies have shown that regular exercise can induce hippocampal neurogenesis and sharpen memory and cognition. On the other hand, a sedentary lifestyle can be detrimental to the heart, bones, and brain, with an elevation in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular risks, both of which can progressively alter brain structure and function.
• Concussion, contusions, and traumatic brain injury obviously can activate the microglia and trigger neurologic sequelae and mental repercussions. At every visit, patients should be asked if they have experienced a mild or severe head injury, whether it is accidental or sports-related.
• Dehydration, especially on the day of the visit, can alter mental status in subtle ways. Cerebral ventricular volume has been shown to change with dehydration. Asking a patient about daily fluid intake should be a standard question, especially for older patients, who may experience hypotension and mental status changes due to hypovolemia.
• Sleep, whether too much or too little, is associated with brain effects and can impact cognition and behavior. Asking patients about sleep is important because it can affect the brain, and also can be a symptom of unresolved psychiatric disorders. Chronic sleep disorders are associated with neuroinflammation.
• Menstrual cycle. Various neuro­transmitters fluctuate during a woman’s menstrual cycle. Her cognition becomes sharper around ovulation, and that may influence her mental status and perhaps the neuroplasticity of her brain.
• Pregnancy and its major hormone changes can change brain structure and function. Estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin have different structural effects on the brain that can help the future mother care for her dependent baby. Asking about missed periods and pregnancy during childbearing years can be useful during psychiatric encounters.

Continue to: In summary...

In summary, numerous variables can affect the patient’s brain between visits, influencing his or her mental status. The ever-changing brain can be challenging to assess, especially in brief 15- to 20-minute follow-up sessions that have become more common in psychiatry. Perhaps patients should help their psychiatrists or nurse practitioners by completing a checklist with all the above variables, either online on the day of their appointment or on a form in the waiting room immediately prior to the visit. This might also increase patients’ awareness of the importance of participating in monitoring themselves.

And finally, let’s not forget that the psychiatrist’s brain also changes continuously due to his or her own daily experiences, stresses, diet, lifestyle, medical illness, or medications. Thus, at every psychiatric session, the brains of both patient and psychiatrist are very different from the previous encounter!

To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: henry.nasrallah@currentpsychiatry.com.

Unlike other organs in the human body, the brain is constantly changing. The main driver for this ongoing re-engineering across various neural circuits is “experiential neuroplasticity,” which creates billions of new synapses and dendrite spines as well as new connections. And as the brain reinvents itself from day to day, the mind evolves as well.

The neurobiologic re-sculpting of the brain’s complex innards continuously encodes memories of what we learn and experience during waking hours, including all that we see, hear, feel, think, contemplate, plan, and decide. However, in addition to the ongoing intrinsic neuroplasticity that records life’s experiences within neural circuits, there are many extrinsic factors that can further modify the brain and the “psyche” it generates via electrical, neurochemical, and physiological mechanisms. That’s why every patient a psychiatrist sees at follow-up visits will have a brain that will be different from the previous encounter.

Consider the following factors that can modify a patient’s brain (for better or worse) between sessions:

• Psychotherapy that the patient received at the last session will biologically modify his or her brain. Creating new insights and understanding of one’s behavior and “connecting the dots” of the past and present emotions and reactions are all associated with neuroplastic changes within the brain.
• Mood or psychotic episodes. Depressive, manic, or psychotic episodes are associated with neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic effects, which can disrupt the brain’s cytoarchitecture. That’s why psychiatrists must inquire about such episodes between visits and document the possible effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Psychotropic medications all bind to one or more brain receptors to exert therapeutic or adverse effects, both of which are associated with changes in neurotransmitter pathways. A key component of every follow-up visit is to gauge the risks and benefits of the pharmacotherapy prescribed at the prior visit.
• Nonpsychiatric prescription medications are often associated with iatrogenic effects on the brain apart from their intended target organs. These iatrogenic effects include anxiety, depression, mania, psychosis, and cognitive changes. That’s why during each visit, the physician or nurse practitioner must review all prescription medications and consider their potential effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Over-the-counter drugs and supplements may exert neurologic effects via histaminergic, muscarinic, glutamatergic, adrenergic, or serotonergic effects—all of which can alter brain chemistry and contribute to mental status changes. They can also inhibit or induce cytochrome enzymes and induce adverse effects or loss of efficacy of the primary psychotropic medication the patient takes.
• Medical illness, even as simple as an upper respiratory viral infection, can alter brain function due to illness-induced physiological aberrations, including pain and peripheral inflammation, with neurologic consequences. Common metabolic disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension can exert mental status changes.
• Alcohol and drugs of abuse alter brain structure and function and can induce psychological and cognitive changes. Inquiring about the amount and frequency of alcohol and recreational drug use must be done in detail at every visit.
• Stressful events. It is almost impossible for a psychiatric patient not to encounter stressful life events between visits. Coping with any mental disorder can be quite stressful and challenging due to its social, vocational, or personal consequences. Stress increases cortisol, which is associated with deleterious inflammatory effects on the brain. Persistent stress can lead to hippocampal atrophy because of the abundance of glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus. Inquiry about stressors must be part of every psychiatric follow-up visit. Multiple psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects are well known to be generated by stress, especially in individuals already impaired by mental illness.
• Diet. What a patient eats (or avoids eating) can affect the brain. High-fat diets can be inflammatory, while a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and nuts can be neuroprotective. The microbiota and the enteric brain—both in the gastrointestinal tract—have been reported to influence mood and behavior. (For more on this, see “Gut microbiota and its implications for psychiatry: A review of 3 studies” on page 40 and “It takes guts to be mentally ill: Microbiota and psychopathology,” From the Editor, Current Psychiatry, September 2018, p. 4-6.)
• Obesity is associated with brain atrophy as well as depression. Weight should be assessed at every visit and coupled with counseling about diet and exercise.
• Exercise, or the lack of it, can alter the brain in good or bad ways. Many studies have shown that regular exercise can induce hippocampal neurogenesis and sharpen memory and cognition. On the other hand, a sedentary lifestyle can be detrimental to the heart, bones, and brain, with an elevation in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular risks, both of which can progressively alter brain structure and function.
• Concussion, contusions, and traumatic brain injury obviously can activate the microglia and trigger neurologic sequelae and mental repercussions. At every visit, patients should be asked if they have experienced a mild or severe head injury, whether it is accidental or sports-related.
• Dehydration, especially on the day of the visit, can alter mental status in subtle ways. Cerebral ventricular volume has been shown to change with dehydration. Asking a patient about daily fluid intake should be a standard question, especially for older patients, who may experience hypotension and mental status changes due to hypovolemia.
• Sleep, whether too much or too little, is associated with brain effects and can impact cognition and behavior. Asking patients about sleep is important because it can affect the brain, and also can be a symptom of unresolved psychiatric disorders. Chronic sleep disorders are associated with neuroinflammation.
• Menstrual cycle. Various neuro­transmitters fluctuate during a woman’s menstrual cycle. Her cognition becomes sharper around ovulation, and that may influence her mental status and perhaps the neuroplasticity of her brain.
• Pregnancy and its major hormone changes can change brain structure and function. Estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin have different structural effects on the brain that can help the future mother care for her dependent baby. Asking about missed periods and pregnancy during childbearing years can be useful during psychiatric encounters.

Continue to: In summary...

In summary, numerous variables can affect the patient’s brain between visits, influencing his or her mental status. The ever-changing brain can be challenging to assess, especially in brief 15- to 20-minute follow-up sessions that have become more common in psychiatry. Perhaps patients should help their psychiatrists or nurse practitioners by completing a checklist with all the above variables, either online on the day of their appointment or on a form in the waiting room immediately prior to the visit. This might also increase patients’ awareness of the importance of participating in monitoring themselves.

And finally, let’s not forget that the psychiatrist’s brain also changes continuously due to his or her own daily experiences, stresses, diet, lifestyle, medical illness, or medications. Thus, at every psychiatric session, the brains of both patient and psychiatrist are very different from the previous encounter!

To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: henry.nasrallah@currentpsychiatry.com.

Unlike other organs in the human body, the brain is constantly changing. The main driver for this ongoing re-engineering across various neural circuits is “experiential neuroplasticity,” which creates billions of new synapses and dendrite spines as well as new connections. And as the brain reinvents itself from day to day, the mind evolves as well.

The neurobiologic re-sculpting of the brain’s complex innards continuously encodes memories of what we learn and experience during waking hours, including all that we see, hear, feel, think, contemplate, plan, and decide. However, in addition to the ongoing intrinsic neuroplasticity that records life’s experiences within neural circuits, there are many extrinsic factors that can further modify the brain and the “psyche” it generates via electrical, neurochemical, and physiological mechanisms. That’s why every patient a psychiatrist sees at follow-up visits will have a brain that will be different from the previous encounter.

Consider the following factors that can modify a patient’s brain (for better or worse) between sessions:

• Psychotherapy that the patient received at the last session will biologically modify his or her brain. Creating new insights and understanding of one’s behavior and “connecting the dots” of the past and present emotions and reactions are all associated with neuroplastic changes within the brain.
• Mood or psychotic episodes. Depressive, manic, or psychotic episodes are associated with neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic effects, which can disrupt the brain’s cytoarchitecture. That’s why psychiatrists must inquire about such episodes between visits and document the possible effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Psychotropic medications all bind to one or more brain receptors to exert therapeutic or adverse effects, both of which are associated with changes in neurotransmitter pathways. A key component of every follow-up visit is to gauge the risks and benefits of the pharmacotherapy prescribed at the prior visit.
• Nonpsychiatric prescription medications are often associated with iatrogenic effects on the brain apart from their intended target organs. These iatrogenic effects include anxiety, depression, mania, psychosis, and cognitive changes. That’s why during each visit, the physician or nurse practitioner must review all prescription medications and consider their potential effects on the patient’s mental status.
• Over-the-counter drugs and supplements may exert neurologic effects via histaminergic, muscarinic, glutamatergic, adrenergic, or serotonergic effects—all of which can alter brain chemistry and contribute to mental status changes. They can also inhibit or induce cytochrome enzymes and induce adverse effects or loss of efficacy of the primary psychotropic medication the patient takes.
• Medical illness, even as simple as an upper respiratory viral infection, can alter brain function due to illness-induced physiological aberrations, including pain and peripheral inflammation, with neurologic consequences. Common metabolic disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension can exert mental status changes.
• Alcohol and drugs of abuse alter brain structure and function and can induce psychological and cognitive changes. Inquiring about the amount and frequency of alcohol and recreational drug use must be done in detail at every visit.
• Stressful events. It is almost impossible for a psychiatric patient not to encounter stressful life events between visits. Coping with any mental disorder can be quite stressful and challenging due to its social, vocational, or personal consequences. Stress increases cortisol, which is associated with deleterious inflammatory effects on the brain. Persistent stress can lead to hippocampal atrophy because of the abundance of glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus. Inquiry about stressors must be part of every psychiatric follow-up visit. Multiple psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects are well known to be generated by stress, especially in individuals already impaired by mental illness.
• Diet. What a patient eats (or avoids eating) can affect the brain. High-fat diets can be inflammatory, while a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and nuts can be neuroprotective. The microbiota and the enteric brain—both in the gastrointestinal tract—have been reported to influence mood and behavior. (For more on this, see “Gut microbiota and its implications for psychiatry: A review of 3 studies” on page 40 and “It takes guts to be mentally ill: Microbiota and psychopathology,” From the Editor, Current Psychiatry, September 2018, p. 4-6.)
• Obesity is associated with brain atrophy as well as depression. Weight should be assessed at every visit and coupled with counseling about diet and exercise.
• Exercise, or the lack of it, can alter the brain in good or bad ways. Many studies have shown that regular exercise can induce hippocampal neurogenesis and sharpen memory and cognition. On the other hand, a sedentary lifestyle can be detrimental to the heart, bones, and brain, with an elevation in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular risks, both of which can progressively alter brain structure and function.
• Concussion, contusions, and traumatic brain injury obviously can activate the microglia and trigger neurologic sequelae and mental repercussions. At every visit, patients should be asked if they have experienced a mild or severe head injury, whether it is accidental or sports-related.
• Dehydration, especially on the day of the visit, can alter mental status in subtle ways. Cerebral ventricular volume has been shown to change with dehydration. Asking a patient about daily fluid intake should be a standard question, especially for older patients, who may experience hypotension and mental status changes due to hypovolemia.
• Sleep, whether too much or too little, is associated with brain effects and can impact cognition and behavior. Asking patients about sleep is important because it can affect the brain, and also can be a symptom of unresolved psychiatric disorders. Chronic sleep disorders are associated with neuroinflammation.
• Menstrual cycle. Various neuro­transmitters fluctuate during a woman’s menstrual cycle. Her cognition becomes sharper around ovulation, and that may influence her mental status and perhaps the neuroplasticity of her brain.
• Pregnancy and its major hormone changes can change brain structure and function. Estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin have different structural effects on the brain that can help the future mother care for her dependent baby. Asking about missed periods and pregnancy during childbearing years can be useful during psychiatric encounters.

Continue to: In summary...

In summary, numerous variables can affect the patient’s brain between visits, influencing his or her mental status. The ever-changing brain can be challenging to assess, especially in brief 15- to 20-minute follow-up sessions that have become more common in psychiatry. Perhaps patients should help their psychiatrists or nurse practitioners by completing a checklist with all the above variables, either online on the day of their appointment or on a form in the waiting room immediately prior to the visit. This might also increase patients’ awareness of the importance of participating in monitoring themselves.

And finally, let’s not forget that the psychiatrist’s brain also changes continuously due to his or her own daily experiences, stresses, diet, lifestyle, medical illness, or medications. Thus, at every psychiatric session, the brains of both patient and psychiatrist are very different from the previous encounter!

To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: henry.nasrallah@currentpsychiatry.com.

PHILADELPHIA – Witnessed apneas during sleep are associated with increased tau accumulation in the entorhinal cortex, according to data that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Tau accumulation is a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease, and the finding suggests a possible explanation for the apparent association between sleep disruption and dementia.

“Our research results raise the possibility that sleep apnea affects tau accumulation,” said Diego Z. Carvalho, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., in a press release. “But it is also possible that higher levels of tau in other regions may predispose a person to sleep apnea, so longer studies are now needed to solve this chicken-and-egg problem.”

Previous research had suggested an association between sleep disruption and increased risk of dementia. Obstructive sleep apnea in particular has been associated with this increased risk. The pathological processes that account for this association are unknown, however.

Dr. Carvalho and colleagues decided to evaluate whether apneas during sleep, reported by the patient or an informant, were associated with high levels of tau in cognitively normal elderly individuals. The investigators identified 288 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging for their analysis. Eligible participants were aged 65 years or older, had no cognitive impairment, had undergone tau PET and amyloid PET scans, and had completed a questionnaire that solicited information about witnessed apneas during sleep (either from patients or bed partners). Dr. Carvalho’s group took the entorhinal cortex as its region of interest because it is highly susceptible to tau accumulation. The entorhinal cortex is involved in memory, navigation, and the perception of time. They chose the cerebellum crus as their reference region.

The investigators created a linear model to evaluate the association between tau in the entorhinal cortex and witnessed apneas. They controlled the data for age, sex, years of education, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, reduced sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness, and global amyloid.

In all, 43 participants (15%) had witnessed apneas during sleep. Witnessed apneas were significantly associated with tau in the entorhinal cortex. After controlling for potential confounders, Dr. Carvalho and colleagues estimated a 0.049 elevation in the entorhinal cortex tau standardized uptake value ratio (95% confidence interval, 0.011–0.087; P = 0.012).

The study had a relatively small sample size, and its results require validation. Other important limitations include the absence of sleep studies to confirm the presence and severity of sleep apnea and a lack of information about whether participants already were receiving treatment for sleep apnea.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Carvalho D et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.6-021.

PHILADELPHIA – Witnessed apneas during sleep are associated with increased tau accumulation in the entorhinal cortex, according to data that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Tau accumulation is a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease, and the finding suggests a possible explanation for the apparent association between sleep disruption and dementia.

“Our research results raise the possibility that sleep apnea affects tau accumulation,” said Diego Z. Carvalho, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., in a press release. “But it is also possible that higher levels of tau in other regions may predispose a person to sleep apnea, so longer studies are now needed to solve this chicken-and-egg problem.”

Previous research had suggested an association between sleep disruption and increased risk of dementia. Obstructive sleep apnea in particular has been associated with this increased risk. The pathological processes that account for this association are unknown, however.

Dr. Carvalho and colleagues decided to evaluate whether apneas during sleep, reported by the patient or an informant, were associated with high levels of tau in cognitively normal elderly individuals. The investigators identified 288 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging for their analysis. Eligible participants were aged 65 years or older, had no cognitive impairment, had undergone tau PET and amyloid PET scans, and had completed a questionnaire that solicited information about witnessed apneas during sleep (either from patients or bed partners). Dr. Carvalho’s group took the entorhinal cortex as its region of interest because it is highly susceptible to tau accumulation. The entorhinal cortex is involved in memory, navigation, and the perception of time. They chose the cerebellum crus as their reference region.

The investigators created a linear model to evaluate the association between tau in the entorhinal cortex and witnessed apneas. They controlled the data for age, sex, years of education, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, reduced sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness, and global amyloid.

In all, 43 participants (15%) had witnessed apneas during sleep. Witnessed apneas were significantly associated with tau in the entorhinal cortex. After controlling for potential confounders, Dr. Carvalho and colleagues estimated a 0.049 elevation in the entorhinal cortex tau standardized uptake value ratio (95% confidence interval, 0.011–0.087; P = 0.012).

The study had a relatively small sample size, and its results require validation. Other important limitations include the absence of sleep studies to confirm the presence and severity of sleep apnea and a lack of information about whether participants already were receiving treatment for sleep apnea.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Carvalho D et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.6-021.

PHILADELPHIA – Witnessed apneas during sleep are associated with increased tau accumulation in the entorhinal cortex, according to data that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Tau accumulation is a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease, and the finding suggests a possible explanation for the apparent association between sleep disruption and dementia.

“Our research results raise the possibility that sleep apnea affects tau accumulation,” said Diego Z. Carvalho, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., in a press release. “But it is also possible that higher levels of tau in other regions may predispose a person to sleep apnea, so longer studies are now needed to solve this chicken-and-egg problem.”

Previous research had suggested an association between sleep disruption and increased risk of dementia. Obstructive sleep apnea in particular has been associated with this increased risk. The pathological processes that account for this association are unknown, however.

Dr. Carvalho and colleagues decided to evaluate whether apneas during sleep, reported by the patient or an informant, were associated with high levels of tau in cognitively normal elderly individuals. The investigators identified 288 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging for their analysis. Eligible participants were aged 65 years or older, had no cognitive impairment, had undergone tau PET and amyloid PET scans, and had completed a questionnaire that solicited information about witnessed apneas during sleep (either from patients or bed partners). Dr. Carvalho’s group took the entorhinal cortex as its region of interest because it is highly susceptible to tau accumulation. The entorhinal cortex is involved in memory, navigation, and the perception of time. They chose the cerebellum crus as their reference region.

The investigators created a linear model to evaluate the association between tau in the entorhinal cortex and witnessed apneas. They controlled the data for age, sex, years of education, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, reduced sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness, and global amyloid.

In all, 43 participants (15%) had witnessed apneas during sleep. Witnessed apneas were significantly associated with tau in the entorhinal cortex. After controlling for potential confounders, Dr. Carvalho and colleagues estimated a 0.049 elevation in the entorhinal cortex tau standardized uptake value ratio (95% confidence interval, 0.011–0.087; P = 0.012).

The study had a relatively small sample size, and its results require validation. Other important limitations include the absence of sleep studies to confirm the presence and severity of sleep apnea and a lack of information about whether participants already were receiving treatment for sleep apnea.

The National Institutes of Health supported the study.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Carvalho D et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.6-021.

BALTIMORE – Most infants prenatally exposed to Zika showed relatively normal neurodevelopment if their fetal MRI and birth head circumference were normal, but others with similarly initial normal measures appeared to struggle with social cognition and mobility as they got older, according to a new study.

“I think we need to be cautious with saying that these children are normal when these normal-appearing children may not be doing as well as we think,” lead author Sarah Mulkey, MD, of Children’s National Health System and George Washington University, Washington, said in an interview. “While most children are showing fairly normal development, there are some children who are … becoming more abnormal over time.”

Dr. Mulkey shared her findings at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting. She and her colleagues had previously published a prospective study of 82 Zika-exposed infants’ fetal brain MRIs. In their new study, they followed up with the 78 Colombian infants from that study whose fetal neuroimaging and birth head circumstance had been normal.

The researchers used the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA) to evaluate 72 of the children, 34 of whom underwent assessment twice. Forty of the children were an average 5.7 months old when evaluated, and 66 were an average 13.5 months old.

As the children got older, their overall WIDEA z-score and their subscores in the social cognition domain and especially in the mobility domain trended downward. Three of the children had AIMS scores two standard deviations below normal, but the rest fell within the normal range.

Their WIDEA communication z-score hovered relatively close to the norm, but self-care also showed a very slight slope downward, albeit not as substantially as in the social cognition and mobility domains.

The younger a child is, the fewer skills they generally show related to neurocognitive development, Dr. Mulkey explained. But as they grow older and are expected to show more skills, it becomes more apparent where gaps and delays might exist.

“We can see that there are a lot of kids doing well, but some of these kids certainly are not,” she said. “Until children have a long time to develop, you really can’t see these changes unless you follow them long-term.”

The researchers also looked separately at a subgroup of 19 children (26%) whose cranial ultrasounds showed mild nonspecific findings. These findings – such as lenticulostriate vasculopathy, choroid plexus cysts, subependymal cysts and calcifications – do not usually indicate any problems, but they appeared in a quarter of this population, considerably more than the approximately 5% typically seen in the general population, Dr. Mulkey said.

BALTIMORE – Most infants prenatally exposed to Zika showed relatively normal neurodevelopment if their fetal MRI and birth head circumference were normal, but others with similarly initial normal measures appeared to struggle with social cognition and mobility as they got older, according to a new study.

“I think we need to be cautious with saying that these children are normal when these normal-appearing children may not be doing as well as we think,” lead author Sarah Mulkey, MD, of Children’s National Health System and George Washington University, Washington, said in an interview. “While most children are showing fairly normal development, there are some children who are … becoming more abnormal over time.”

Dr. Mulkey shared her findings at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting. She and her colleagues had previously published a prospective study of 82 Zika-exposed infants’ fetal brain MRIs. In their new study, they followed up with the 78 Colombian infants from that study whose fetal neuroimaging and birth head circumstance had been normal.

The researchers used the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA) to evaluate 72 of the children, 34 of whom underwent assessment twice. Forty of the children were an average 5.7 months old when evaluated, and 66 were an average 13.5 months old.

As the children got older, their overall WIDEA z-score and their subscores in the social cognition domain and especially in the mobility domain trended downward. Three of the children had AIMS scores two standard deviations below normal, but the rest fell within the normal range.

Their WIDEA communication z-score hovered relatively close to the norm, but self-care also showed a very slight slope downward, albeit not as substantially as in the social cognition and mobility domains.

The younger a child is, the fewer skills they generally show related to neurocognitive development, Dr. Mulkey explained. But as they grow older and are expected to show more skills, it becomes more apparent where gaps and delays might exist.

“We can see that there are a lot of kids doing well, but some of these kids certainly are not,” she said. “Until children have a long time to develop, you really can’t see these changes unless you follow them long-term.”

The researchers also looked separately at a subgroup of 19 children (26%) whose cranial ultrasounds showed mild nonspecific findings. These findings – such as lenticulostriate vasculopathy, choroid plexus cysts, subependymal cysts and calcifications – do not usually indicate any problems, but they appeared in a quarter of this population, considerably more than the approximately 5% typically seen in the general population, Dr. Mulkey said.

BALTIMORE – Most infants prenatally exposed to Zika showed relatively normal neurodevelopment if their fetal MRI and birth head circumference were normal, but others with similarly initial normal measures appeared to struggle with social cognition and mobility as they got older, according to a new study.

“I think we need to be cautious with saying that these children are normal when these normal-appearing children may not be doing as well as we think,” lead author Sarah Mulkey, MD, of Children’s National Health System and George Washington University, Washington, said in an interview. “While most children are showing fairly normal development, there are some children who are … becoming more abnormal over time.”

Dr. Mulkey shared her findings at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting. She and her colleagues had previously published a prospective study of 82 Zika-exposed infants’ fetal brain MRIs. In their new study, they followed up with the 78 Colombian infants from that study whose fetal neuroimaging and birth head circumstance had been normal.

The researchers used the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA) to evaluate 72 of the children, 34 of whom underwent assessment twice. Forty of the children were an average 5.7 months old when evaluated, and 66 were an average 13.5 months old.

As the children got older, their overall WIDEA z-score and their subscores in the social cognition domain and especially in the mobility domain trended downward. Three of the children had AIMS scores two standard deviations below normal, but the rest fell within the normal range.

Their WIDEA communication z-score hovered relatively close to the norm, but self-care also showed a very slight slope downward, albeit not as substantially as in the social cognition and mobility domains.

The younger a child is, the fewer skills they generally show related to neurocognitive development, Dr. Mulkey explained. But as they grow older and are expected to show more skills, it becomes more apparent where gaps and delays might exist.

“We can see that there are a lot of kids doing well, but some of these kids certainly are not,” she said. “Until children have a long time to develop, you really can’t see these changes unless you follow them long-term.”

The researchers also looked separately at a subgroup of 19 children (26%) whose cranial ultrasounds showed mild nonspecific findings. These findings – such as lenticulostriate vasculopathy, choroid plexus cysts, subependymal cysts and calcifications – do not usually indicate any problems, but they appeared in a quarter of this population, considerably more than the approximately 5% typically seen in the general population, Dr. Mulkey said.

Medical cannabis is safe, effective, and may reduce opioid use in elderly patients with chronic medical conditions, results of a recent retrospective chart review suggest. Treatment with medical cannabis improved pain, sleep, anxiety, and neuropathy in patients aged 75 years of age and older, and was associated with reduced use of opioids in about one-third of cases, according to authors of the study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

LPETTET/Getty Images

“Our findings are promising and can help fuel further research into medical marijuana as an additional option for this group of people who often have chronic conditions,” said lead investigator Laszlo Mechtler, MD, of Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, N.Y., in a news release. However, additional randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm results of this study, Dr. Mechtler added.

The chart review focused on 204 elderly patients who participated in New York State’s medical marijuana program and were followed in a neurologic outpatient setting. The cohort included 129 female and 75 male patients, ranging in age from 75 to 102 years, with a mean age of 81 years. The medical marijuana was taken by mouth as a liquid extract tincture, capsule, or in an electronic vaporizer.

With an average exposure time of 16.8 weeks, 69% of patients experienced symptomatic benefit, according to patient self-report. The most commonly reported benefit was relief of chronic pain in 49%, while improvements in sleep, neuropathy, and anxiety were reported in 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. Reductions in opioid pain medication were noted in about one-third of cases, they found.

While 34% of patients had adverse effects on medical marijuana, only 21% reported adverse effects after cannabinoid doses were adjusted, investigators said. Adverse effects led to discontinuation of medical cannabis in seven patients, or 3.4% of the overall cohort. Somnolence, disequilibrium, and gastrointestinal disturbance were the most common adverse effects, occurring in 13%, 7%, and 7% of patients, respectively. Euphoria was reported in 3% of patients.

Among patients who had no reported adverse effects, the most commonly used formulation was a balanced 1:1 tincture of tetrahydrocannabinol to cannabidiol, investigators said.

Further trials could explore optimal dosing of medical cannabis in elderly patients and shed more light on adverse effects such as somnolence and disequilibrium, according to Dr. Mechtler and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Dent Family Foundation.

SOURCE: Bargnes V et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P4.1-014.

Medical cannabis is safe, effective, and may reduce opioid use in elderly patients with chronic medical conditions, results of a recent retrospective chart review suggest. Treatment with medical cannabis improved pain, sleep, anxiety, and neuropathy in patients aged 75 years of age and older, and was associated with reduced use of opioids in about one-third of cases, according to authors of the study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

LPETTET/Getty Images

“Our findings are promising and can help fuel further research into medical marijuana as an additional option for this group of people who often have chronic conditions,” said lead investigator Laszlo Mechtler, MD, of Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, N.Y., in a news release. However, additional randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm results of this study, Dr. Mechtler added.

The chart review focused on 204 elderly patients who participated in New York State’s medical marijuana program and were followed in a neurologic outpatient setting. The cohort included 129 female and 75 male patients, ranging in age from 75 to 102 years, with a mean age of 81 years. The medical marijuana was taken by mouth as a liquid extract tincture, capsule, or in an electronic vaporizer.

With an average exposure time of 16.8 weeks, 69% of patients experienced symptomatic benefit, according to patient self-report. The most commonly reported benefit was relief of chronic pain in 49%, while improvements in sleep, neuropathy, and anxiety were reported in 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. Reductions in opioid pain medication were noted in about one-third of cases, they found.

While 34% of patients had adverse effects on medical marijuana, only 21% reported adverse effects after cannabinoid doses were adjusted, investigators said. Adverse effects led to discontinuation of medical cannabis in seven patients, or 3.4% of the overall cohort. Somnolence, disequilibrium, and gastrointestinal disturbance were the most common adverse effects, occurring in 13%, 7%, and 7% of patients, respectively. Euphoria was reported in 3% of patients.

Among patients who had no reported adverse effects, the most commonly used formulation was a balanced 1:1 tincture of tetrahydrocannabinol to cannabidiol, investigators said.

Further trials could explore optimal dosing of medical cannabis in elderly patients and shed more light on adverse effects such as somnolence and disequilibrium, according to Dr. Mechtler and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Dent Family Foundation.

SOURCE: Bargnes V et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P4.1-014.

Medical cannabis is safe, effective, and may reduce opioid use in elderly patients with chronic medical conditions, results of a recent retrospective chart review suggest. Treatment with medical cannabis improved pain, sleep, anxiety, and neuropathy in patients aged 75 years of age and older, and was associated with reduced use of opioids in about one-third of cases, according to authors of the study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

LPETTET/Getty Images

“Our findings are promising and can help fuel further research into medical marijuana as an additional option for this group of people who often have chronic conditions,” said lead investigator Laszlo Mechtler, MD, of Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, N.Y., in a news release. However, additional randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm results of this study, Dr. Mechtler added.

The chart review focused on 204 elderly patients who participated in New York State’s medical marijuana program and were followed in a neurologic outpatient setting. The cohort included 129 female and 75 male patients, ranging in age from 75 to 102 years, with a mean age of 81 years. The medical marijuana was taken by mouth as a liquid extract tincture, capsule, or in an electronic vaporizer.

With an average exposure time of 16.8 weeks, 69% of patients experienced symptomatic benefit, according to patient self-report. The most commonly reported benefit was relief of chronic pain in 49%, while improvements in sleep, neuropathy, and anxiety were reported in 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. Reductions in opioid pain medication were noted in about one-third of cases, they found.

While 34% of patients had adverse effects on medical marijuana, only 21% reported adverse effects after cannabinoid doses were adjusted, investigators said. Adverse effects led to discontinuation of medical cannabis in seven patients, or 3.4% of the overall cohort. Somnolence, disequilibrium, and gastrointestinal disturbance were the most common adverse effects, occurring in 13%, 7%, and 7% of patients, respectively. Euphoria was reported in 3% of patients.

Among patients who had no reported adverse effects, the most commonly used formulation was a balanced 1:1 tincture of tetrahydrocannabinol to cannabidiol, investigators said.

Further trials could explore optimal dosing of medical cannabis in elderly patients and shed more light on adverse effects such as somnolence and disequilibrium, according to Dr. Mechtler and colleagues.

The study was supported by the Dent Family Foundation.

SOURCE: Bargnes V et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P4.1-014.

Professional soccer players may be at increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to Italian researchers who reviewed trading cards of about 25,000 male professional soccer players who played in Italy. The researchers then scanned news reports to find which of those players developed the rare neurologic disease. Players who developed ALS were a much younger age at diagnosis when compared with the general population, according to the researchers, who will present their findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

While the findings might implicate professional-level soccer in the development of ALS, there could be other factors at work, said lead author Ettore Beghi, MD, of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan. “Repeated traumatic events, heavy physical exercise, and substance use could also be factors in the increased ALS risk among soccer players,” Dr. Beghi said in a news release. “In addition, genetics may play a role.”

The ALS-related deaths of several Italian pro soccer players sparked suggestions that the disease and the sport could be somehow linked, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues. To determine whether professional soccer players are at increased ALS risk, they reviewed the archives of the country’s major soccer card publisher from the years 1959 to 2000, recording the name, date, and place of birth; field position; and team history for the tens of thousands of players they identified.

News reports revealed that 33 players in that cohort developed ALS, compared with 17.6 cases that would be expected based on Italian general population estimates, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues.

The number of cases per 100,000 person-years was 1.9 for all the soccer players, and 4.7 for those who were younger than 45 years at diagnosis, researchers said. In general, soccer players were younger at diagnosis, with a median age of ALS onset of 43.3 years, versus 62.5 years in the general population, they added.

These findings cannot be applied to those who play soccer below the professional level, since only professional athletes were studied, Dr. Beghi said. Moreover, the results should not be construed to suggest that people avoid playing soccer, he said, adding that the researchers had few specific details on the players’ ALS diagnoses.

Patients with ALS more often report head injuries, compared with the general population, while links between exercise and ALS have been found in some studies, but not others, according to the researchers.

“Clinical and experimental observations suggest an association between ALS and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and dietary supplements, including branched chain amino acids,” researchers added in the abstract for their report.

The study by Dr. Beghi and colleagues was supported by the Mario Negri Institute in Milan.

Source: Beghi E et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S1.001.

Professional soccer players may be at increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to Italian researchers who reviewed trading cards of about 25,000 male professional soccer players who played in Italy. The researchers then scanned news reports to find which of those players developed the rare neurologic disease. Players who developed ALS were a much younger age at diagnosis when compared with the general population, according to the researchers, who will present their findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

While the findings might implicate professional-level soccer in the development of ALS, there could be other factors at work, said lead author Ettore Beghi, MD, of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan. “Repeated traumatic events, heavy physical exercise, and substance use could also be factors in the increased ALS risk among soccer players,” Dr. Beghi said in a news release. “In addition, genetics may play a role.”

The ALS-related deaths of several Italian pro soccer players sparked suggestions that the disease and the sport could be somehow linked, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues. To determine whether professional soccer players are at increased ALS risk, they reviewed the archives of the country’s major soccer card publisher from the years 1959 to 2000, recording the name, date, and place of birth; field position; and team history for the tens of thousands of players they identified.

News reports revealed that 33 players in that cohort developed ALS, compared with 17.6 cases that would be expected based on Italian general population estimates, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues.

The number of cases per 100,000 person-years was 1.9 for all the soccer players, and 4.7 for those who were younger than 45 years at diagnosis, researchers said. In general, soccer players were younger at diagnosis, with a median age of ALS onset of 43.3 years, versus 62.5 years in the general population, they added.

These findings cannot be applied to those who play soccer below the professional level, since only professional athletes were studied, Dr. Beghi said. Moreover, the results should not be construed to suggest that people avoid playing soccer, he said, adding that the researchers had few specific details on the players’ ALS diagnoses.

Patients with ALS more often report head injuries, compared with the general population, while links between exercise and ALS have been found in some studies, but not others, according to the researchers.

“Clinical and experimental observations suggest an association between ALS and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and dietary supplements, including branched chain amino acids,” researchers added in the abstract for their report.

The study by Dr. Beghi and colleagues was supported by the Mario Negri Institute in Milan.

Source: Beghi E et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S1.001.

Professional soccer players may be at increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), according to Italian researchers who reviewed trading cards of about 25,000 male professional soccer players who played in Italy. The researchers then scanned news reports to find which of those players developed the rare neurologic disease. Players who developed ALS were a much younger age at diagnosis when compared with the general population, according to the researchers, who will present their findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

While the findings might implicate professional-level soccer in the development of ALS, there could be other factors at work, said lead author Ettore Beghi, MD, of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan. “Repeated traumatic events, heavy physical exercise, and substance use could also be factors in the increased ALS risk among soccer players,” Dr. Beghi said in a news release. “In addition, genetics may play a role.”

The ALS-related deaths of several Italian pro soccer players sparked suggestions that the disease and the sport could be somehow linked, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues. To determine whether professional soccer players are at increased ALS risk, they reviewed the archives of the country’s major soccer card publisher from the years 1959 to 2000, recording the name, date, and place of birth; field position; and team history for the tens of thousands of players they identified.

News reports revealed that 33 players in that cohort developed ALS, compared with 17.6 cases that would be expected based on Italian general population estimates, according to Dr. Beghi and colleagues.

The number of cases per 100,000 person-years was 1.9 for all the soccer players, and 4.7 for those who were younger than 45 years at diagnosis, researchers said. In general, soccer players were younger at diagnosis, with a median age of ALS onset of 43.3 years, versus 62.5 years in the general population, they added.

These findings cannot be applied to those who play soccer below the professional level, since only professional athletes were studied, Dr. Beghi said. Moreover, the results should not be construed to suggest that people avoid playing soccer, he said, adding that the researchers had few specific details on the players’ ALS diagnoses.

Patients with ALS more often report head injuries, compared with the general population, while links between exercise and ALS have been found in some studies, but not others, according to the researchers.

“Clinical and experimental observations suggest an association between ALS and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and dietary supplements, including branched chain amino acids,” researchers added in the abstract for their report.

The study by Dr. Beghi and colleagues was supported by the Mario Negri Institute in Milan.

Source: Beghi E et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S1.001.

High body mass index (BMI) is associated with reduced mortality and reduced disability after acute ischemic stroke, according to research that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“One possible explanation is that people who are overweight or obese may have a nutritional reserve that may help them survive during prolonged illness,” said Zuolu Liu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, in a press release. “More research is needed to investigate the relationship between BMI and stroke.”

The obesity paradox was first noted when studies suggested that being overweight improved survival in patients with kidney disease or heart disease. Investigators previously examined whether the obesity paradox is observed in stroke, but their studies were underpowered and produced ambiguous results.

Dr. Liu and colleagues sought to evaluate the relationship between BMI and 90-day outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. They examined data for all participants in the FAST-MAG trial, which studied whether prehospital treatment with magnesium improved disability outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. Dr. Liu and colleagues focused on the outcomes of death, disability or death (that is, modified Rankin Scale score of 2-6), and low stroke-related quality of life (that is, Stroke Impact Scale score less than 70). They analyzed potential relationships with BMI univariately and in multivariate models that adjusted for 12 prognostic variables, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and smoking.

Dr. Liu’s group included 1,033 participants in its study. The population’s mean age was 71 years, and 45.1% of the population was female. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 10.6, and mean BMI was 27.5 kg/m².

The investigators found an inverse association between the risk of death and BMI. Adjusted odds ratios for mortality were 1.67 for underweight participants, 0.85 for overweight participants, 0.54 for obese participants, and 0.38 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. Similarly, the risk of disability had a U-shaped relationship with BMI. Odds ratios for disability or death were 1.19 for underweight participants, 0.78 for overweight participants, 0.72 for obese participants, and 0.96 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. This relationship was attenuated after adjustment for other prognostic factors, however. Dr. Liu’s group did not find a significant association between BMI and low stroke-related quality of life.

The study was limited by the fact that all participants were from Southern California, which potentially reduced the generalizability of the results. The racial and ethnic composition of the study population, however, is similar to that of the national population, said the researchers.

No study sponsor was reported.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Liu Z et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.3-01.

High body mass index (BMI) is associated with reduced mortality and reduced disability after acute ischemic stroke, according to research that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“One possible explanation is that people who are overweight or obese may have a nutritional reserve that may help them survive during prolonged illness,” said Zuolu Liu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, in a press release. “More research is needed to investigate the relationship between BMI and stroke.”

The obesity paradox was first noted when studies suggested that being overweight improved survival in patients with kidney disease or heart disease. Investigators previously examined whether the obesity paradox is observed in stroke, but their studies were underpowered and produced ambiguous results.

Dr. Liu and colleagues sought to evaluate the relationship between BMI and 90-day outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. They examined data for all participants in the FAST-MAG trial, which studied whether prehospital treatment with magnesium improved disability outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. Dr. Liu and colleagues focused on the outcomes of death, disability or death (that is, modified Rankin Scale score of 2-6), and low stroke-related quality of life (that is, Stroke Impact Scale score less than 70). They analyzed potential relationships with BMI univariately and in multivariate models that adjusted for 12 prognostic variables, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and smoking.

Dr. Liu’s group included 1,033 participants in its study. The population’s mean age was 71 years, and 45.1% of the population was female. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 10.6, and mean BMI was 27.5 kg/m².

The investigators found an inverse association between the risk of death and BMI. Adjusted odds ratios for mortality were 1.67 for underweight participants, 0.85 for overweight participants, 0.54 for obese participants, and 0.38 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. Similarly, the risk of disability had a U-shaped relationship with BMI. Odds ratios for disability or death were 1.19 for underweight participants, 0.78 for overweight participants, 0.72 for obese participants, and 0.96 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. This relationship was attenuated after adjustment for other prognostic factors, however. Dr. Liu’s group did not find a significant association between BMI and low stroke-related quality of life.

The study was limited by the fact that all participants were from Southern California, which potentially reduced the generalizability of the results. The racial and ethnic composition of the study population, however, is similar to that of the national population, said the researchers.

No study sponsor was reported.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Liu Z et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.3-01.

High body mass index (BMI) is associated with reduced mortality and reduced disability after acute ischemic stroke, according to research that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“One possible explanation is that people who are overweight or obese may have a nutritional reserve that may help them survive during prolonged illness,” said Zuolu Liu, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, in a press release. “More research is needed to investigate the relationship between BMI and stroke.”

The obesity paradox was first noted when studies suggested that being overweight improved survival in patients with kidney disease or heart disease. Investigators previously examined whether the obesity paradox is observed in stroke, but their studies were underpowered and produced ambiguous results.

Dr. Liu and colleagues sought to evaluate the relationship between BMI and 90-day outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. They examined data for all participants in the FAST-MAG trial, which studied whether prehospital treatment with magnesium improved disability outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. Dr. Liu and colleagues focused on the outcomes of death, disability or death (that is, modified Rankin Scale score of 2-6), and low stroke-related quality of life (that is, Stroke Impact Scale score less than 70). They analyzed potential relationships with BMI univariately and in multivariate models that adjusted for 12 prognostic variables, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and smoking.

Dr. Liu’s group included 1,033 participants in its study. The population’s mean age was 71 years, and 45.1% of the population was female. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 10.6, and mean BMI was 27.5 kg/m².

The investigators found an inverse association between the risk of death and BMI. Adjusted odds ratios for mortality were 1.67 for underweight participants, 0.85 for overweight participants, 0.54 for obese participants, and 0.38 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. Similarly, the risk of disability had a U-shaped relationship with BMI. Odds ratios for disability or death were 1.19 for underweight participants, 0.78 for overweight participants, 0.72 for obese participants, and 0.96 for severely obese participants, compared with participants of normal weight. This relationship was attenuated after adjustment for other prognostic factors, however. Dr. Liu’s group did not find a significant association between BMI and low stroke-related quality of life.

The study was limited by the fact that all participants were from Southern California, which potentially reduced the generalizability of the results. The racial and ethnic composition of the study population, however, is similar to that of the national population, said the researchers.

No study sponsor was reported.
 

egreb@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Liu Z et al. AAN 2019, Abstract P3.3-01.

Although stroke is a risk factor for osteoporosis, falls, and fractures, very few people who have experienced a recent stroke are either screened for osteoporosis or treated, research suggests.

Writing in Stroke, researchers presented an analysis of Ontario registry data from 16,581 patients who were aged 65 years or older and presented with stroke between 2003 and 2013.

Overall, just 5.1% of patients underwent bone mineral density testing. Of the 1,577 patients who had experienced a prior fracture, 71 (4.7%) had bone mineral density testing, and only 2.9% of those who had not had prior bone mineral density testing were tested after their stroke. Bone mineral density testing was more likely in patients who were younger, who were female, and who experienced a low-trauma fracture in the year after their stroke.

In total, 15.5% of patients were prescribed osteoporosis drugs in the first year after their stroke. However, only 7.8% of those who had fractures before the stroke and 14.8% of those with fractures after the stroke received osteoporosis treatment after the stroke. Patients who were female, had prior osteoporosis, had experienced prior fracture, had previously undergone bone mineral density testing, or had experienced a fracture or fall after their stroke were more likely to receive osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

The authors found that the neither the severity of stroke nor the presence of other comorbidities was associated with an increased likelihood of screening or treatment of osteoporosis after the stroke.

Stroke is associated with up to a fourfold increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture, compared with healthy controls, most probably because of reduced mobility and an increased risk of falls, wrote Eshita Kapoor of the department of medicine at the University of Toronto and her coauthors.

“Screening and treatment may be particularly low poststroke because of under-recognition of osteoporosis as a consequence of stroke, a selective focus on the management of cardiovascular risk and stroke recovery, or factors such as dysphagia precluding use of oral bisphosphonates,” the authors wrote.

While the association is noted in U.S. stroke guidelines, there are few recommendations for treatment aside from fall prevention strategies, which the authors noted was a missed opportunity for prevention.

“Use of a risk prediction score to identify those at particularly high short-term risk of fractures after stroke may help to prioritize patients for osteoporosis testing and treatment,” they suggested.

The study was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and was supported by ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. One author declared consultancies for the pharmaceutical sector. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Kapoor E et al. Stroke. 2019 April 25. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024685
 

Although stroke is a risk factor for osteoporosis, falls, and fractures, very few people who have experienced a recent stroke are either screened for osteoporosis or treated, research suggests.

Writing in Stroke, researchers presented an analysis of Ontario registry data from 16,581 patients who were aged 65 years or older and presented with stroke between 2003 and 2013.

Overall, just 5.1% of patients underwent bone mineral density testing. Of the 1,577 patients who had experienced a prior fracture, 71 (4.7%) had bone mineral density testing, and only 2.9% of those who had not had prior bone mineral density testing were tested after their stroke. Bone mineral density testing was more likely in patients who were younger, who were female, and who experienced a low-trauma fracture in the year after their stroke.

In total, 15.5% of patients were prescribed osteoporosis drugs in the first year after their stroke. However, only 7.8% of those who had fractures before the stroke and 14.8% of those with fractures after the stroke received osteoporosis treatment after the stroke. Patients who were female, had prior osteoporosis, had experienced prior fracture, had previously undergone bone mineral density testing, or had experienced a fracture or fall after their stroke were more likely to receive osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

The authors found that the neither the severity of stroke nor the presence of other comorbidities was associated with an increased likelihood of screening or treatment of osteoporosis after the stroke.

Stroke is associated with up to a fourfold increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture, compared with healthy controls, most probably because of reduced mobility and an increased risk of falls, wrote Eshita Kapoor of the department of medicine at the University of Toronto and her coauthors.

“Screening and treatment may be particularly low poststroke because of under-recognition of osteoporosis as a consequence of stroke, a selective focus on the management of cardiovascular risk and stroke recovery, or factors such as dysphagia precluding use of oral bisphosphonates,” the authors wrote.

While the association is noted in U.S. stroke guidelines, there are few recommendations for treatment aside from fall prevention strategies, which the authors noted was a missed opportunity for prevention.

“Use of a risk prediction score to identify those at particularly high short-term risk of fractures after stroke may help to prioritize patients for osteoporosis testing and treatment,” they suggested.

The study was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and was supported by ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. One author declared consultancies for the pharmaceutical sector. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Kapoor E et al. Stroke. 2019 April 25. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024685
 

Although stroke is a risk factor for osteoporosis, falls, and fractures, very few people who have experienced a recent stroke are either screened for osteoporosis or treated, research suggests.

Writing in Stroke, researchers presented an analysis of Ontario registry data from 16,581 patients who were aged 65 years or older and presented with stroke between 2003 and 2013.

Overall, just 5.1% of patients underwent bone mineral density testing. Of the 1,577 patients who had experienced a prior fracture, 71 (4.7%) had bone mineral density testing, and only 2.9% of those who had not had prior bone mineral density testing were tested after their stroke. Bone mineral density testing was more likely in patients who were younger, who were female, and who experienced a low-trauma fracture in the year after their stroke.

In total, 15.5% of patients were prescribed osteoporosis drugs in the first year after their stroke. However, only 7.8% of those who had fractures before the stroke and 14.8% of those with fractures after the stroke received osteoporosis treatment after the stroke. Patients who were female, had prior osteoporosis, had experienced prior fracture, had previously undergone bone mineral density testing, or had experienced a fracture or fall after their stroke were more likely to receive osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

The authors found that the neither the severity of stroke nor the presence of other comorbidities was associated with an increased likelihood of screening or treatment of osteoporosis after the stroke.

Stroke is associated with up to a fourfold increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture, compared with healthy controls, most probably because of reduced mobility and an increased risk of falls, wrote Eshita Kapoor of the department of medicine at the University of Toronto and her coauthors.

“Screening and treatment may be particularly low poststroke because of under-recognition of osteoporosis as a consequence of stroke, a selective focus on the management of cardiovascular risk and stroke recovery, or factors such as dysphagia precluding use of oral bisphosphonates,” the authors wrote.

While the association is noted in U.S. stroke guidelines, there are few recommendations for treatment aside from fall prevention strategies, which the authors noted was a missed opportunity for prevention.

“Use of a risk prediction score to identify those at particularly high short-term risk of fractures after stroke may help to prioritize patients for osteoporosis testing and treatment,” they suggested.

The study was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and was supported by ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. One author declared consultancies for the pharmaceutical sector. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Kapoor E et al. Stroke. 2019 April 25. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024685
 

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are warning against the misapplication of the agency’s 2016 guidelines on opioid prescribing, as well as clarifying dosage recommendations for patients starting or stopping pain medications.

In a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 24, lead author Deborah Dowell, MD, chief medical officer for the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, conveyed concern that some policies and practices derived from the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain are inconsistent with the recommendations and often go beyond their scope.

Misapplication examples include inappropriately applying the guideline to patients in active cancer treatment, patients experiencing acute sickle cell crises, or patients experiencing postsurgical pain, Dr. Dowell wrote.

The guideline offers guidance to clinicians treating chronic pain in adults who are already receiving opioids long-term at high dosages, she noted. It includes advice on maximizing nonopioid treatment, reviewing risks associated with continuing high-dose opioids, and collaborating with patients who agree to taper dosage, among other guidance.

Any application of the guideline’s dosage recommendation that results in hard limits or “cutting off” opioids is also an incorrect use of the recommendations, according to Dr. Dowell.

While the guideline advises clinicians to start opioids at the lowest effective dosage and avoid increasing dosage to 90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or more, that statement does not suggest discontinuation of opioids already prescribed at high dosages, according to the CDC’s clarification.

The guidance also does not apply to patients receiving or starting medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.

The commentary comes after a trio of organizations raised concerns that insurers are inappropriately applying the recommendations to active cancer patients when making coverage determinations.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the American Society of Hematology, raised the issue in a letter to the CDC in February. In response, Dr. Dowell clarified that the recommendations are not intended to deny clinically appropriate opioid therapy to any patients who suffer chronic pain, but rather to ensure that physicians and patients consider all safe and effective treatment options.

In the perspective, Dr. Dowell wrote that the CDC is evaluating the intended and unintended impact of the 2016 opioid-prescribing guideline on clinician and patient outcomes and that the agency is committed to updating the recommendations when new evidence is available.
 

agallegos@mdedge.com

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are warning against the misapplication of the agency’s 2016 guidelines on opioid prescribing, as well as clarifying dosage recommendations for patients starting or stopping pain medications.

In a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 24, lead author Deborah Dowell, MD, chief medical officer for the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, conveyed concern that some policies and practices derived from the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain are inconsistent with the recommendations and often go beyond their scope.

Misapplication examples include inappropriately applying the guideline to patients in active cancer treatment, patients experiencing acute sickle cell crises, or patients experiencing postsurgical pain, Dr. Dowell wrote.

The guideline offers guidance to clinicians treating chronic pain in adults who are already receiving opioids long-term at high dosages, she noted. It includes advice on maximizing nonopioid treatment, reviewing risks associated with continuing high-dose opioids, and collaborating with patients who agree to taper dosage, among other guidance.

Any application of the guideline’s dosage recommendation that results in hard limits or “cutting off” opioids is also an incorrect use of the recommendations, according to Dr. Dowell.

While the guideline advises clinicians to start opioids at the lowest effective dosage and avoid increasing dosage to 90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or more, that statement does not suggest discontinuation of opioids already prescribed at high dosages, according to the CDC’s clarification.

The guidance also does not apply to patients receiving or starting medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.

The commentary comes after a trio of organizations raised concerns that insurers are inappropriately applying the recommendations to active cancer patients when making coverage determinations.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the American Society of Hematology, raised the issue in a letter to the CDC in February. In response, Dr. Dowell clarified that the recommendations are not intended to deny clinically appropriate opioid therapy to any patients who suffer chronic pain, but rather to ensure that physicians and patients consider all safe and effective treatment options.

In the perspective, Dr. Dowell wrote that the CDC is evaluating the intended and unintended impact of the 2016 opioid-prescribing guideline on clinician and patient outcomes and that the agency is committed to updating the recommendations when new evidence is available.
 

agallegos@mdedge.com

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are warning against the misapplication of the agency’s 2016 guidelines on opioid prescribing, as well as clarifying dosage recommendations for patients starting or stopping pain medications.

In a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 24, lead author Deborah Dowell, MD, chief medical officer for the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, conveyed concern that some policies and practices derived from the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain are inconsistent with the recommendations and often go beyond their scope.

Misapplication examples include inappropriately applying the guideline to patients in active cancer treatment, patients experiencing acute sickle cell crises, or patients experiencing postsurgical pain, Dr. Dowell wrote.

The guideline offers guidance to clinicians treating chronic pain in adults who are already receiving opioids long-term at high dosages, she noted. It includes advice on maximizing nonopioid treatment, reviewing risks associated with continuing high-dose opioids, and collaborating with patients who agree to taper dosage, among other guidance.

Any application of the guideline’s dosage recommendation that results in hard limits or “cutting off” opioids is also an incorrect use of the recommendations, according to Dr. Dowell.

While the guideline advises clinicians to start opioids at the lowest effective dosage and avoid increasing dosage to 90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or more, that statement does not suggest discontinuation of opioids already prescribed at high dosages, according to the CDC’s clarification.

The guidance also does not apply to patients receiving or starting medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.

The commentary comes after a trio of organizations raised concerns that insurers are inappropriately applying the recommendations to active cancer patients when making coverage determinations.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the American Society of Hematology, raised the issue in a letter to the CDC in February. In response, Dr. Dowell clarified that the recommendations are not intended to deny clinically appropriate opioid therapy to any patients who suffer chronic pain, but rather to ensure that physicians and patients consider all safe and effective treatment options.

In the perspective, Dr. Dowell wrote that the CDC is evaluating the intended and unintended impact of the 2016 opioid-prescribing guideline on clinician and patient outcomes and that the agency is committed to updating the recommendations when new evidence is available.
 

agallegos@mdedge.com