Cutis

The Diagnosis: Hypopigmented Mycosis Fungoides

The patient was started on clobetasol dipropionate cream 0.05% twice daily, which she did not tolerate due to a burning sensation on application. She then was started on narrowband UVB phototherapy 2 to 3 times weekly, and the hypopigmented areas began to improve. Narrowband UVB phototherapy was discontinued after 7 weeks due to the high cost to the patient, but the hypopigmented patches on the left thigh appeared to remit, and the patient did not return to the clinic for 6 months. She returned when the areas on the left thigh reappeared, along with new areas on the right buttock and right medial upper arm. Serial biopsies of the new patches also revealed a CD8⁺ atypical lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with hypopigmented patch-stage mycosis fungoides (MF). She was started on halobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily to affected areas, which she tolerated well. Complete blood count and peripheral blood smear were unremarkable, and the patient continued to deny systemic symptoms. Over the next year, the patient's cutaneous findings continued to wax and wane with topical treatment, and she was referred to a regional cancer treatment center for a second opinion from a hematopathologist. Hematopathologic and dermatopathologic review of the case, including hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, was highly consistent with hypopigmented MF (Figures 1-3).

Mycosis fungoides is an uncommon disease characterized by atypical clonal T cells exhibiting epidermotropism. Most commonly, MF is characterized by a CD4⁺ lymphocytic infiltrate. Mycosis fungoides can be difficult to diagnose in its early stages, as it may resemble benign inflammatory conditions (eg, chronic atopic dermatitis, nummular eczema) and often requires biopsy and additional studies, such as immunohistochemistry, to secure a diagnosis. Hypopigmented MF is regarded as a subtype of MF, as it can exhibit different clinical and pathologic characteristics from classical MF. In particular, the lymphocytic phenotype in hypopigmented MF is more likely to be CD8⁺. 

In general, the progression of MF is characterized as stage IA (patches or plaques involving less than 10% body surface area [BSA]), IB (patches or plaques involving ≥10% BSA without lymph node or visceral involvement), IIA (patches or plaques of any percentage of BSA with lymph node involvement), IIB (cutaneous tumors with or without lymph node involvement), III (erythroderma with low blood tumor burden), or IV (erythroderma with high blood tumor burden with or without visceral involvement). Hypopigmented MF generally presents in early patch stage and rarely progresses past stage IB, and thus generally has a favorable prognosis.^1,2 Kim et al³ demonstrated that evolution from patch to plaque stage MF is accompanied by a shift in lymphocytes from the T helper 1 (Th1) to T helper 2 phenotype; therefore the Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells are associated with lower risk for disease progression. Other investigators also have hypothesized that predominance of Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells may have an immunoregulatory effect, thus preventing evolution of disease from patch to plaque stage and explaining why hypopigmented MF, with a predominantly CD8⁺ phenotype, confers better prognosis with less chance for disease progression than classical MF.^4,5 The patch- or plaque-stage lesions of classical MF have a predilection for non-sun exposed areas (eg, buttocks, medial thighs, breasts),² whereas hypopigmented MF tends to present with hypopigmented or depigmented lesions mainly distributed on the trunk, arms, and legs. These lesions may become more visible following sun exposure.¹ The size of the hypopigmented lesions can vary, and patients may complain of pruritus with variable intensity.

Hypopigmented MF presents more commonly in younger populations, in contrast to classical MF.^6-8 However, like classical MF, hypopigmented MF appears to more frequently affect individuals with darker Fitzpatrick skin types.^1,9,10 Although it generally is accepted that hypopigmented MF does not favor either sex, some studies suggest that hypopigmented MF has a female predominance.^6,10

Classical MF is characterized by an epidermotropic infiltrate of CD4⁺ T helper cells,¹⁰ whereas CD8⁺ epidermotropism is considered hallmark in hypopigmented MF.^10-12 The other typical histopathologic features of hypopigmented MF generally are identical to those of classical MF, with solitary or small groups of atypical haloed lymphocytes within the basal layer, exocytosis of lymphocytes out of proportion to spongiosis, and papillary dermal fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry generally is helpful in distinguishing between classical MF and hypopigmented MF.

The clinical differential diagnosis for hypopigmented MF includes the early (inflammatory) stage of vitiligo, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, lichen sclerosus, pityriasis alba, and leprosy.

First-line treatment for hypopigmented MF consists of phototherapy/photochemotherapy and topical steroids.^9,13 Narrowband UVB phototherapy has been used with good success in pediatric patients.¹⁴ However, narrowband UVB may not be as effective in darker-skinned individuals; it has been hypothesized that this lack of efficacy could be due to the protective effects of increased melanin in the skin.¹ Other topical therapies may include topical carmustine and topical nitrogen mustard.

The Diagnosis: Hypopigmented Mycosis Fungoides

The patient was started on clobetasol dipropionate cream 0.05% twice daily, which she did not tolerate due to a burning sensation on application. She then was started on narrowband UVB phototherapy 2 to 3 times weekly, and the hypopigmented areas began to improve. Narrowband UVB phototherapy was discontinued after 7 weeks due to the high cost to the patient, but the hypopigmented patches on the left thigh appeared to remit, and the patient did not return to the clinic for 6 months. She returned when the areas on the left thigh reappeared, along with new areas on the right buttock and right medial upper arm. Serial biopsies of the new patches also revealed a CD8⁺ atypical lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with hypopigmented patch-stage mycosis fungoides (MF). She was started on halobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily to affected areas, which she tolerated well. Complete blood count and peripheral blood smear were unremarkable, and the patient continued to deny systemic symptoms. Over the next year, the patient's cutaneous findings continued to wax and wane with topical treatment, and she was referred to a regional cancer treatment center for a second opinion from a hematopathologist. Hematopathologic and dermatopathologic review of the case, including hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, was highly consistent with hypopigmented MF (Figures 1-3).

Mycosis fungoides is an uncommon disease characterized by atypical clonal T cells exhibiting epidermotropism. Most commonly, MF is characterized by a CD4⁺ lymphocytic infiltrate. Mycosis fungoides can be difficult to diagnose in its early stages, as it may resemble benign inflammatory conditions (eg, chronic atopic dermatitis, nummular eczema) and often requires biopsy and additional studies, such as immunohistochemistry, to secure a diagnosis. Hypopigmented MF is regarded as a subtype of MF, as it can exhibit different clinical and pathologic characteristics from classical MF. In particular, the lymphocytic phenotype in hypopigmented MF is more likely to be CD8⁺. 

In general, the progression of MF is characterized as stage IA (patches or plaques involving less than 10% body surface area [BSA]), IB (patches or plaques involving ≥10% BSA without lymph node or visceral involvement), IIA (patches or plaques of any percentage of BSA with lymph node involvement), IIB (cutaneous tumors with or without lymph node involvement), III (erythroderma with low blood tumor burden), or IV (erythroderma with high blood tumor burden with or without visceral involvement). Hypopigmented MF generally presents in early patch stage and rarely progresses past stage IB, and thus generally has a favorable prognosis.^1,2 Kim et al³ demonstrated that evolution from patch to plaque stage MF is accompanied by a shift in lymphocytes from the T helper 1 (Th1) to T helper 2 phenotype; therefore the Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells are associated with lower risk for disease progression. Other investigators also have hypothesized that predominance of Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells may have an immunoregulatory effect, thus preventing evolution of disease from patch to plaque stage and explaining why hypopigmented MF, with a predominantly CD8⁺ phenotype, confers better prognosis with less chance for disease progression than classical MF.^4,5 The patch- or plaque-stage lesions of classical MF have a predilection for non-sun exposed areas (eg, buttocks, medial thighs, breasts),² whereas hypopigmented MF tends to present with hypopigmented or depigmented lesions mainly distributed on the trunk, arms, and legs. These lesions may become more visible following sun exposure.¹ The size of the hypopigmented lesions can vary, and patients may complain of pruritus with variable intensity.

Hypopigmented MF presents more commonly in younger populations, in contrast to classical MF.^6-8 However, like classical MF, hypopigmented MF appears to more frequently affect individuals with darker Fitzpatrick skin types.^1,9,10 Although it generally is accepted that hypopigmented MF does not favor either sex, some studies suggest that hypopigmented MF has a female predominance.^6,10

Classical MF is characterized by an epidermotropic infiltrate of CD4⁺ T helper cells,¹⁰ whereas CD8⁺ epidermotropism is considered hallmark in hypopigmented MF.^10-12 The other typical histopathologic features of hypopigmented MF generally are identical to those of classical MF, with solitary or small groups of atypical haloed lymphocytes within the basal layer, exocytosis of lymphocytes out of proportion to spongiosis, and papillary dermal fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry generally is helpful in distinguishing between classical MF and hypopigmented MF.

The clinical differential diagnosis for hypopigmented MF includes the early (inflammatory) stage of vitiligo, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, lichen sclerosus, pityriasis alba, and leprosy.

First-line treatment for hypopigmented MF consists of phototherapy/photochemotherapy and topical steroids.^9,13 Narrowband UVB phototherapy has been used with good success in pediatric patients.¹⁴ However, narrowband UVB may not be as effective in darker-skinned individuals; it has been hypothesized that this lack of efficacy could be due to the protective effects of increased melanin in the skin.¹ Other topical therapies may include topical carmustine and topical nitrogen mustard.

The Diagnosis: Hypopigmented Mycosis Fungoides

The patient was started on clobetasol dipropionate cream 0.05% twice daily, which she did not tolerate due to a burning sensation on application. She then was started on narrowband UVB phototherapy 2 to 3 times weekly, and the hypopigmented areas began to improve. Narrowband UVB phototherapy was discontinued after 7 weeks due to the high cost to the patient, but the hypopigmented patches on the left thigh appeared to remit, and the patient did not return to the clinic for 6 months. She returned when the areas on the left thigh reappeared, along with new areas on the right buttock and right medial upper arm. Serial biopsies of the new patches also revealed a CD8⁺ atypical lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with hypopigmented patch-stage mycosis fungoides (MF). She was started on halobetasol ointment 0.05% twice daily to affected areas, which she tolerated well. Complete blood count and peripheral blood smear were unremarkable, and the patient continued to deny systemic symptoms. Over the next year, the patient's cutaneous findings continued to wax and wane with topical treatment, and she was referred to a regional cancer treatment center for a second opinion from a hematopathologist. Hematopathologic and dermatopathologic review of the case, including hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, was highly consistent with hypopigmented MF (Figures 1-3).

Mycosis fungoides is an uncommon disease characterized by atypical clonal T cells exhibiting epidermotropism. Most commonly, MF is characterized by a CD4⁺ lymphocytic infiltrate. Mycosis fungoides can be difficult to diagnose in its early stages, as it may resemble benign inflammatory conditions (eg, chronic atopic dermatitis, nummular eczema) and often requires biopsy and additional studies, such as immunohistochemistry, to secure a diagnosis. Hypopigmented MF is regarded as a subtype of MF, as it can exhibit different clinical and pathologic characteristics from classical MF. In particular, the lymphocytic phenotype in hypopigmented MF is more likely to be CD8⁺. 

In general, the progression of MF is characterized as stage IA (patches or plaques involving less than 10% body surface area [BSA]), IB (patches or plaques involving ≥10% BSA without lymph node or visceral involvement), IIA (patches or plaques of any percentage of BSA with lymph node involvement), IIB (cutaneous tumors with or without lymph node involvement), III (erythroderma with low blood tumor burden), or IV (erythroderma with high blood tumor burden with or without visceral involvement). Hypopigmented MF generally presents in early patch stage and rarely progresses past stage IB, and thus generally has a favorable prognosis.^1,2 Kim et al³ demonstrated that evolution from patch to plaque stage MF is accompanied by a shift in lymphocytes from the T helper 1 (Th1) to T helper 2 phenotype; therefore the Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells are associated with lower risk for disease progression. Other investigators also have hypothesized that predominance of Th1 phenotype, CD8⁺ T cells may have an immunoregulatory effect, thus preventing evolution of disease from patch to plaque stage and explaining why hypopigmented MF, with a predominantly CD8⁺ phenotype, confers better prognosis with less chance for disease progression than classical MF.^4,5 The patch- or plaque-stage lesions of classical MF have a predilection for non-sun exposed areas (eg, buttocks, medial thighs, breasts),² whereas hypopigmented MF tends to present with hypopigmented or depigmented lesions mainly distributed on the trunk, arms, and legs. These lesions may become more visible following sun exposure.¹ The size of the hypopigmented lesions can vary, and patients may complain of pruritus with variable intensity.

Hypopigmented MF presents more commonly in younger populations, in contrast to classical MF.^6-8 However, like classical MF, hypopigmented MF appears to more frequently affect individuals with darker Fitzpatrick skin types.^1,9,10 Although it generally is accepted that hypopigmented MF does not favor either sex, some studies suggest that hypopigmented MF has a female predominance.^6,10

Classical MF is characterized by an epidermotropic infiltrate of CD4⁺ T helper cells,¹⁰ whereas CD8⁺ epidermotropism is considered hallmark in hypopigmented MF.^10-12 The other typical histopathologic features of hypopigmented MF generally are identical to those of classical MF, with solitary or small groups of atypical haloed lymphocytes within the basal layer, exocytosis of lymphocytes out of proportion to spongiosis, and papillary dermal fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry generally is helpful in distinguishing between classical MF and hypopigmented MF.

The clinical differential diagnosis for hypopigmented MF includes the early (inflammatory) stage of vitiligo, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, lichen sclerosus, pityriasis alba, and leprosy.

First-line treatment for hypopigmented MF consists of phototherapy/photochemotherapy and topical steroids.^9,13 Narrowband UVB phototherapy has been used with good success in pediatric patients.¹⁴ However, narrowband UVB may not be as effective in darker-skinned individuals; it has been hypothesized that this lack of efficacy could be due to the protective effects of increased melanin in the skin.¹ Other topical therapies may include topical carmustine and topical nitrogen mustard.

Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare disease contributing to widespread fat necrosis in patients with underlying pancreatic disorders. This entity was first described in 1883,¹ but it was not until 1947 that it was reported in the English-language literature.² Patients with pancreatitis infrequently develop extrapancreatic manifestations. It has been estimated that only 2% to 3% of patients worldwide with an underlying pancreatic disease develop cutaneous lesions.³ Patients who develop pancreatic panniculitis typically present with tender, edematous, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs with the tendency for spontaneous ulceration. Lesions tend to exude a viscous, yellow-brown, oily substance that represents liquefactive necrosis of enzymatic fat in subcutaneous tissue. Cutaneous lesions may precede, occur simultaneously, or follow the development of an underlying pancreatic disorder. Rarely, patients may develop inflammatory arthritis secondary to intraosseous fat necrosis, completing the triad of findings diagnostic for panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis (PPP) syndrome. Although the underlying pancreatic pathology may vary, roughly 80% of cases worldwide have acute/chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly acinar cell carcinoma.^4-6 Less common pancreatic disorders include pancreatic pseudocyst, pancreatic divisum, and vascular pancreatic fistulas.⁷ Narváez et al⁸ found that of the 25 cases of PPP syndrome reported in the literature, 68% (17/25) were men, 32% (8/25) were women, 56% (14/25) were younger than 50 years, and 64% (16/25) had a history of prior or current alcohol abuse.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic pancreatitis of unknown etiology, and arthritis presented to our clinic for evaluation of painful skin nodules on the lower legs of 8 months’ duration, in addition to joint pain and swelling of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), metatarsophalangeal, and ankle joints. He had a history of numerous hospital admissions over the last 2 years for pancreatitis and was being managed by the rheumatology department for arthritic symptoms.

Physical examination revealed multiple 1- to 4-cm, ill-defined, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the bilateral lower legs (Figure 1) and right inferomedial thigh that were tender to palpation. Marked erythema and edema of the MCP and metatarsophalangeal joints (Figure 2) and bilateral ankles were observed. Diffuse 2+ pitting edema was present in the bilateral lower extremities, along with areas of hyperpigmentation overlying resolving lesions.

Laboratory data revealed an elevated lipase level (>16,000 U/L [reference range, 31–186 U/L]), amylase level (>4700 U/L [reference range, 27–131 U/L]), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (94 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]), and C-reactive protein level (93.5 mg/L [0.08–3.1 mg/L]). The patient had more than 6 episodes of recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis over the last 2 years, though symptoms of abdominal pain were minimal to nonexistent. Liver function tests and alcohol, calcium, and triglyceride levels all were within reference range. Rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies were negative.

Ultrasonography showed no evidence of cholelithiasis. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a 1.8×1.4-cm hypodense lesion within the pancreatic head with calcifications and mild proximal pancreatic ductal dilatation (Figure 3). However, multiple magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations and endoscopic ultrasounds with fine-needle aspiration specimens were performed, all negative for malignancy. Computed tomography of the left ankle demonstrated evidence of bony cortical destruction in the lateral aspect of the posterior calcaneus. Bone biopsy specimens demonstrated mild chronic inflammation with no evidence of osteomyelitis. A serum uric acid level was found to be 4.4 mg/dL (reference range, 4.0–8.0 mg/dL) and a joint aspirate demonstrated turbid fluid with lipoid material and no evidence of crystals or organisms on culture. Furthermore, a 4-mm punch biopsy of a nodule on the right leg revealed extensive lobular and septal liquefactive adipocyte necrosis with scattered neutrophils and lymphocytes (Figure 4). Aggregates of fine granular basophilic material were observed with prominent adipocyte degeneration and calcification.

Symptomatic treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) along with intralesional, topical, and oral corticosteroids had proven ineffective in the management of this patient. He was subsequently referred to the surgery department for a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) with notable improvement in pancreatic enzyme levels, lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and arthritis weeks after surgery.

Comment

A triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis characterizes a rare entity known as PPP syndrome. Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare form of subcutaneous lobular fat necrosis associated with various underlying pancreatic disorders. Approximately 0.3% to 3.0% of patients with an underlying pancreatic disorder are affected with pancreatic panniculitis.⁹ Pancreatic panniculitis has been found in roughly 2% to 3% of patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly the acinar cell type.¹⁰ Narváez et al⁸ reported that nearly two-thirds of patients diagnosed with PPP syndrome have minimal to absent abdominal symptoms that often lead to misdiagnosis and affect the overall prognosis of patients with pancreatic disease. Any delay in the diagnosis of PPP syndrome leads to a worse prognosis, with a mortality rate reported to be approximately 24%.⁸ Potts et al⁵ provided a review of 27 patients with pancreatic panniculitis in which all 8 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 42% (8/19) of patients with pancreatitis died.

Pancreatic panniculitis in the setting of PPP syndrome commonly presents with erythematous to brown, exquisitely tender, edematous, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs. Lesions can range in size from several millimeters to 5 cm. The subcutaneous nodules may spontaneously ulcerate and exude oily viscous material from the liquefactive necrosis of adipocytes. In approximately 40% of patients, skin lesions are the presenting feature.¹¹ Lesions typically resolve only after the pancreatic inflammation regresses, leaving behind atrophic hyperpigmented scars.³ Other presenting symptoms may include joint pain, pitting edema, and subcutaneous nodules, which can precede the diagnosis by up to 9 months.

The exact pathogenesis of PPP syndrome remains unclear. The most widely recognized hypothesis suggests that pancreatic enzymes (eg, trypsin, amylase, lipase, phospholipase A) released from the damaged pancreas are transported through the bloodstream to distant visceral and soft tissue sites, leading to lipolysis and inflammation to the surrounding subcutis and bone marrow.³ Ferrari et al¹² reported this effect as a product of the accumulation of high levels of free fatty acids within the joint space by the action of lipolytic pancreatic enzymes on adipose cell membranes, resulting in acute arthritis.

Histopathologic findings of pancreatic panniculitis vary based on the acuity of the disease. Acute lesions typically demonstrate lobular and septal panniculitis. Szymanski and Bluefarb¹³ described the pathognomonic histologic findings of focal liquefactive necrosis and anucleate necrotic adipocytes surrounded by a shadowy and thickened cell membrane signifying the characteristic ghost cells. Fine basophilic material also may be seen intermixed with the necrotic adipocytes, representing saponified calcium. A brisk inflammatory infiltrate involving lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils tends to surround the areas of necrotic adipocytes. Chronic lesions often demonstrate a paucity of fat necrosis and ghost cells and more granulomatous infiltrate. Langerhans giant cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes predominate in the subcutaneous fat.

Laboratory findings associated with pancreatic panniculitis may include elevated serum amylase, lipase, and/or trypsin levels. Not all the enzymes have to be elevated simultaneously. On occasion, one enzyme may be within reference range while the others are elevated. Rarely, patients may have an elevated lipase level with no signs of underlying pancreatic disease, which demonstrates that panniculitis does not correlate with the enzyme levels. In all cases of suspected pancreatic panniculitis, a complete laboratory workup is recommended including lipase, amylase, and trypsin serum levels. Eosinophilia may be a prominent finding in patients with pancreatic panniculitis and tends to occur in association with an underlying pancreatic carcinoma. Patients with pancreatic panniculitis associated with pancreatic carcinoma tend to have more severe, diffuse, and persistent subcutaneous nodules that often are refractory to treatment with frequent recurrence. A rare constellation of findings known as Schmid triad is comprised of panniculitis, polyarthritis, and eosinophilia and typically portends a poor prognosis secondary to an underlying pancreatic tumor.¹⁴ Cutaneous nodules may predate the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma by several months, thus signifying the need for a high index of suspicion in patients with lower leg subcutaneous nodules.

Joint disease most commonly involves the ankles, knees, wrists, and MCP joints.^5,6,11 It has been suggested that arthritic symptoms are from periarticular fat necrosis or a direct extension from the necrotic subcutaneous tissue to the adjacent joint space.¹⁵ Dahl et al³ reported the composition of joint effusion fluid in 3 patients with PPP syndrome. The aspirate in all 3 patients contained viscous yellow material similar to the necrotic adipose tissue seen draining from subcutaneous nodules. Joint aspirate analysis demonstrated increased concentration of free fatty acids in the joint fluid consistent with severe lipolysis.³

The PPP syndrome acronym may be misleading to physicians, as arthritis is not always polyarticular. Dahl et al³ reported that monoarticular or oligoarticular arthritic symptoms were present in 56% of patients studied. In rare cases, the arthritic symptoms antedated the diagnosis of clinically asymptomatic pancreatic disease. Arthritis can be either symmetric or asymmetric and infrequently follows a chronic course, leading to radiographic lytic lesions and symptoms that often are unresponsive to conventional therapy.¹⁶

Treatment of PPP syndrome is largely supportive, with a focus on correcting the underlying pancreatic disease. It is imperative to identify any complicating factors contributing to high levels of circulating pancreatic enzymes. Pseudocysts must be addressed if discovered in these patients, as they often perpetuate the substantial release of pancreatic enzymes into the serum, leading to characteristic subcutaneous fat necrosis and arthritis. Sepsis also is a concern, likely secondary to bacterial colonization of the ulcerated subcutaneous nodules and compromised skin barrier. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids have been used for symptomatic relief but usually are ineffective and have not been shown to reduce the duration of the disease.^12,16 Octreotide has been utilized and may potentially reduce pancreatic enzyme secretion leading to improvement in cutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions.¹⁷ Plasmapheresis has been used as an adjuvant treatment in patients with persistent hyperamylasemia and hyperlipasemia, but reports are anecdotal. Often reserved for severe disease, cholecystectomy, pancreatic duct removal, and pancreaticoduodenectomy have demonstrated success in the management of chronic pancreatitis and panniculitis. Dahl et al³ reported 2 cases in which cholecystectomy was performed with complete resolution of the skin and pancreatic disease. Our patient was initially treated symptomatically with NSAIDs and corticosteroids but there was no clinical response. The patient eventually underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy 9 months after the onset of symptoms with complete resolution of joint pain and swelling, greater than 50% resolution of his lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and remarkable reduction in amylase and lipase levels on 1-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis syndrome is a rare diagnosis characterized by a triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis. Adjuvant therapies for PPP syndrome, such as NSAIDs, corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and octreotide, have been used with equivocal results, but definitive treatment requires correction of the primary pancreatic disorder. More importantly, many pancreatic diseases can cause pancreatic panniculitis, but extensive, refractory, or ulcerated cases could be an early indicator of an occult pancreatic malignancy and should prompt early evaluation with a multidisciplinary approach. This approach should incorporate management from dermatology, internal medicine, rheumatology, gastroenterology, surgery, and primary care.

Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare disease contributing to widespread fat necrosis in patients with underlying pancreatic disorders. This entity was first described in 1883,¹ but it was not until 1947 that it was reported in the English-language literature.² Patients with pancreatitis infrequently develop extrapancreatic manifestations. It has been estimated that only 2% to 3% of patients worldwide with an underlying pancreatic disease develop cutaneous lesions.³ Patients who develop pancreatic panniculitis typically present with tender, edematous, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs with the tendency for spontaneous ulceration. Lesions tend to exude a viscous, yellow-brown, oily substance that represents liquefactive necrosis of enzymatic fat in subcutaneous tissue. Cutaneous lesions may precede, occur simultaneously, or follow the development of an underlying pancreatic disorder. Rarely, patients may develop inflammatory arthritis secondary to intraosseous fat necrosis, completing the triad of findings diagnostic for panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis (PPP) syndrome. Although the underlying pancreatic pathology may vary, roughly 80% of cases worldwide have acute/chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly acinar cell carcinoma.^4-6 Less common pancreatic disorders include pancreatic pseudocyst, pancreatic divisum, and vascular pancreatic fistulas.⁷ Narváez et al⁸ found that of the 25 cases of PPP syndrome reported in the literature, 68% (17/25) were men, 32% (8/25) were women, 56% (14/25) were younger than 50 years, and 64% (16/25) had a history of prior or current alcohol abuse.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic pancreatitis of unknown etiology, and arthritis presented to our clinic for evaluation of painful skin nodules on the lower legs of 8 months’ duration, in addition to joint pain and swelling of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), metatarsophalangeal, and ankle joints. He had a history of numerous hospital admissions over the last 2 years for pancreatitis and was being managed by the rheumatology department for arthritic symptoms.

Physical examination revealed multiple 1- to 4-cm, ill-defined, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the bilateral lower legs (Figure 1) and right inferomedial thigh that were tender to palpation. Marked erythema and edema of the MCP and metatarsophalangeal joints (Figure 2) and bilateral ankles were observed. Diffuse 2+ pitting edema was present in the bilateral lower extremities, along with areas of hyperpigmentation overlying resolving lesions.

Laboratory data revealed an elevated lipase level (>16,000 U/L [reference range, 31–186 U/L]), amylase level (>4700 U/L [reference range, 27–131 U/L]), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (94 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]), and C-reactive protein level (93.5 mg/L [0.08–3.1 mg/L]). The patient had more than 6 episodes of recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis over the last 2 years, though symptoms of abdominal pain were minimal to nonexistent. Liver function tests and alcohol, calcium, and triglyceride levels all were within reference range. Rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies were negative.

Ultrasonography showed no evidence of cholelithiasis. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a 1.8×1.4-cm hypodense lesion within the pancreatic head with calcifications and mild proximal pancreatic ductal dilatation (Figure 3). However, multiple magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations and endoscopic ultrasounds with fine-needle aspiration specimens were performed, all negative for malignancy. Computed tomography of the left ankle demonstrated evidence of bony cortical destruction in the lateral aspect of the posterior calcaneus. Bone biopsy specimens demonstrated mild chronic inflammation with no evidence of osteomyelitis. A serum uric acid level was found to be 4.4 mg/dL (reference range, 4.0–8.0 mg/dL) and a joint aspirate demonstrated turbid fluid with lipoid material and no evidence of crystals or organisms on culture. Furthermore, a 4-mm punch biopsy of a nodule on the right leg revealed extensive lobular and septal liquefactive adipocyte necrosis with scattered neutrophils and lymphocytes (Figure 4). Aggregates of fine granular basophilic material were observed with prominent adipocyte degeneration and calcification.

Symptomatic treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) along with intralesional, topical, and oral corticosteroids had proven ineffective in the management of this patient. He was subsequently referred to the surgery department for a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) with notable improvement in pancreatic enzyme levels, lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and arthritis weeks after surgery.

Comment

A triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis characterizes a rare entity known as PPP syndrome. Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare form of subcutaneous lobular fat necrosis associated with various underlying pancreatic disorders. Approximately 0.3% to 3.0% of patients with an underlying pancreatic disorder are affected with pancreatic panniculitis.⁹ Pancreatic panniculitis has been found in roughly 2% to 3% of patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly the acinar cell type.¹⁰ Narváez et al⁸ reported that nearly two-thirds of patients diagnosed with PPP syndrome have minimal to absent abdominal symptoms that often lead to misdiagnosis and affect the overall prognosis of patients with pancreatic disease. Any delay in the diagnosis of PPP syndrome leads to a worse prognosis, with a mortality rate reported to be approximately 24%.⁸ Potts et al⁵ provided a review of 27 patients with pancreatic panniculitis in which all 8 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 42% (8/19) of patients with pancreatitis died.

Pancreatic panniculitis in the setting of PPP syndrome commonly presents with erythematous to brown, exquisitely tender, edematous, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs. Lesions can range in size from several millimeters to 5 cm. The subcutaneous nodules may spontaneously ulcerate and exude oily viscous material from the liquefactive necrosis of adipocytes. In approximately 40% of patients, skin lesions are the presenting feature.¹¹ Lesions typically resolve only after the pancreatic inflammation regresses, leaving behind atrophic hyperpigmented scars.³ Other presenting symptoms may include joint pain, pitting edema, and subcutaneous nodules, which can precede the diagnosis by up to 9 months.

The exact pathogenesis of PPP syndrome remains unclear. The most widely recognized hypothesis suggests that pancreatic enzymes (eg, trypsin, amylase, lipase, phospholipase A) released from the damaged pancreas are transported through the bloodstream to distant visceral and soft tissue sites, leading to lipolysis and inflammation to the surrounding subcutis and bone marrow.³ Ferrari et al¹² reported this effect as a product of the accumulation of high levels of free fatty acids within the joint space by the action of lipolytic pancreatic enzymes on adipose cell membranes, resulting in acute arthritis.

Histopathologic findings of pancreatic panniculitis vary based on the acuity of the disease. Acute lesions typically demonstrate lobular and septal panniculitis. Szymanski and Bluefarb¹³ described the pathognomonic histologic findings of focal liquefactive necrosis and anucleate necrotic adipocytes surrounded by a shadowy and thickened cell membrane signifying the characteristic ghost cells. Fine basophilic material also may be seen intermixed with the necrotic adipocytes, representing saponified calcium. A brisk inflammatory infiltrate involving lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils tends to surround the areas of necrotic adipocytes. Chronic lesions often demonstrate a paucity of fat necrosis and ghost cells and more granulomatous infiltrate. Langerhans giant cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes predominate in the subcutaneous fat.

Laboratory findings associated with pancreatic panniculitis may include elevated serum amylase, lipase, and/or trypsin levels. Not all the enzymes have to be elevated simultaneously. On occasion, one enzyme may be within reference range while the others are elevated. Rarely, patients may have an elevated lipase level with no signs of underlying pancreatic disease, which demonstrates that panniculitis does not correlate with the enzyme levels. In all cases of suspected pancreatic panniculitis, a complete laboratory workup is recommended including lipase, amylase, and trypsin serum levels. Eosinophilia may be a prominent finding in patients with pancreatic panniculitis and tends to occur in association with an underlying pancreatic carcinoma. Patients with pancreatic panniculitis associated with pancreatic carcinoma tend to have more severe, diffuse, and persistent subcutaneous nodules that often are refractory to treatment with frequent recurrence. A rare constellation of findings known as Schmid triad is comprised of panniculitis, polyarthritis, and eosinophilia and typically portends a poor prognosis secondary to an underlying pancreatic tumor.¹⁴ Cutaneous nodules may predate the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma by several months, thus signifying the need for a high index of suspicion in patients with lower leg subcutaneous nodules.

Joint disease most commonly involves the ankles, knees, wrists, and MCP joints.^5,6,11 It has been suggested that arthritic symptoms are from periarticular fat necrosis or a direct extension from the necrotic subcutaneous tissue to the adjacent joint space.¹⁵ Dahl et al³ reported the composition of joint effusion fluid in 3 patients with PPP syndrome. The aspirate in all 3 patients contained viscous yellow material similar to the necrotic adipose tissue seen draining from subcutaneous nodules. Joint aspirate analysis demonstrated increased concentration of free fatty acids in the joint fluid consistent with severe lipolysis.³

The PPP syndrome acronym may be misleading to physicians, as arthritis is not always polyarticular. Dahl et al³ reported that monoarticular or oligoarticular arthritic symptoms were present in 56% of patients studied. In rare cases, the arthritic symptoms antedated the diagnosis of clinically asymptomatic pancreatic disease. Arthritis can be either symmetric or asymmetric and infrequently follows a chronic course, leading to radiographic lytic lesions and symptoms that often are unresponsive to conventional therapy.¹⁶

Treatment of PPP syndrome is largely supportive, with a focus on correcting the underlying pancreatic disease. It is imperative to identify any complicating factors contributing to high levels of circulating pancreatic enzymes. Pseudocysts must be addressed if discovered in these patients, as they often perpetuate the substantial release of pancreatic enzymes into the serum, leading to characteristic subcutaneous fat necrosis and arthritis. Sepsis also is a concern, likely secondary to bacterial colonization of the ulcerated subcutaneous nodules and compromised skin barrier. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids have been used for symptomatic relief but usually are ineffective and have not been shown to reduce the duration of the disease.^12,16 Octreotide has been utilized and may potentially reduce pancreatic enzyme secretion leading to improvement in cutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions.¹⁷ Plasmapheresis has been used as an adjuvant treatment in patients with persistent hyperamylasemia and hyperlipasemia, but reports are anecdotal. Often reserved for severe disease, cholecystectomy, pancreatic duct removal, and pancreaticoduodenectomy have demonstrated success in the management of chronic pancreatitis and panniculitis. Dahl et al³ reported 2 cases in which cholecystectomy was performed with complete resolution of the skin and pancreatic disease. Our patient was initially treated symptomatically with NSAIDs and corticosteroids but there was no clinical response. The patient eventually underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy 9 months after the onset of symptoms with complete resolution of joint pain and swelling, greater than 50% resolution of his lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and remarkable reduction in amylase and lipase levels on 1-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis syndrome is a rare diagnosis characterized by a triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis. Adjuvant therapies for PPP syndrome, such as NSAIDs, corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and octreotide, have been used with equivocal results, but definitive treatment requires correction of the primary pancreatic disorder. More importantly, many pancreatic diseases can cause pancreatic panniculitis, but extensive, refractory, or ulcerated cases could be an early indicator of an occult pancreatic malignancy and should prompt early evaluation with a multidisciplinary approach. This approach should incorporate management from dermatology, internal medicine, rheumatology, gastroenterology, surgery, and primary care.

Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare disease contributing to widespread fat necrosis in patients with underlying pancreatic disorders. This entity was first described in 1883,¹ but it was not until 1947 that it was reported in the English-language literature.² Patients with pancreatitis infrequently develop extrapancreatic manifestations. It has been estimated that only 2% to 3% of patients worldwide with an underlying pancreatic disease develop cutaneous lesions.³ Patients who develop pancreatic panniculitis typically present with tender, edematous, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs with the tendency for spontaneous ulceration. Lesions tend to exude a viscous, yellow-brown, oily substance that represents liquefactive necrosis of enzymatic fat in subcutaneous tissue. Cutaneous lesions may precede, occur simultaneously, or follow the development of an underlying pancreatic disorder. Rarely, patients may develop inflammatory arthritis secondary to intraosseous fat necrosis, completing the triad of findings diagnostic for panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis (PPP) syndrome. Although the underlying pancreatic pathology may vary, roughly 80% of cases worldwide have acute/chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly acinar cell carcinoma.^4-6 Less common pancreatic disorders include pancreatic pseudocyst, pancreatic divisum, and vascular pancreatic fistulas.⁷ Narváez et al⁸ found that of the 25 cases of PPP syndrome reported in the literature, 68% (17/25) were men, 32% (8/25) were women, 56% (14/25) were younger than 50 years, and 64% (16/25) had a history of prior or current alcohol abuse.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic pancreatitis of unknown etiology, and arthritis presented to our clinic for evaluation of painful skin nodules on the lower legs of 8 months’ duration, in addition to joint pain and swelling of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), metatarsophalangeal, and ankle joints. He had a history of numerous hospital admissions over the last 2 years for pancreatitis and was being managed by the rheumatology department for arthritic symptoms.

Physical examination revealed multiple 1- to 4-cm, ill-defined, erythematous to brown, subcutaneous nodules on the bilateral lower legs (Figure 1) and right inferomedial thigh that were tender to palpation. Marked erythema and edema of the MCP and metatarsophalangeal joints (Figure 2) and bilateral ankles were observed. Diffuse 2+ pitting edema was present in the bilateral lower extremities, along with areas of hyperpigmentation overlying resolving lesions.

Laboratory data revealed an elevated lipase level (>16,000 U/L [reference range, 31–186 U/L]), amylase level (>4700 U/L [reference range, 27–131 U/L]), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (94 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]), and C-reactive protein level (93.5 mg/L [0.08–3.1 mg/L]). The patient had more than 6 episodes of recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis over the last 2 years, though symptoms of abdominal pain were minimal to nonexistent. Liver function tests and alcohol, calcium, and triglyceride levels all were within reference range. Rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies were negative.

Ultrasonography showed no evidence of cholelithiasis. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a 1.8×1.4-cm hypodense lesion within the pancreatic head with calcifications and mild proximal pancreatic ductal dilatation (Figure 3). However, multiple magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations and endoscopic ultrasounds with fine-needle aspiration specimens were performed, all negative for malignancy. Computed tomography of the left ankle demonstrated evidence of bony cortical destruction in the lateral aspect of the posterior calcaneus. Bone biopsy specimens demonstrated mild chronic inflammation with no evidence of osteomyelitis. A serum uric acid level was found to be 4.4 mg/dL (reference range, 4.0–8.0 mg/dL) and a joint aspirate demonstrated turbid fluid with lipoid material and no evidence of crystals or organisms on culture. Furthermore, a 4-mm punch biopsy of a nodule on the right leg revealed extensive lobular and septal liquefactive adipocyte necrosis with scattered neutrophils and lymphocytes (Figure 4). Aggregates of fine granular basophilic material were observed with prominent adipocyte degeneration and calcification.

Symptomatic treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) along with intralesional, topical, and oral corticosteroids had proven ineffective in the management of this patient. He was subsequently referred to the surgery department for a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) with notable improvement in pancreatic enzyme levels, lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and arthritis weeks after surgery.

Comment

A triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis characterizes a rare entity known as PPP syndrome. Pancreatic panniculitis is a rare form of subcutaneous lobular fat necrosis associated with various underlying pancreatic disorders. Approximately 0.3% to 3.0% of patients with an underlying pancreatic disorder are affected with pancreatic panniculitis.⁹ Pancreatic panniculitis has been found in roughly 2% to 3% of patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma, most commonly the acinar cell type.¹⁰ Narváez et al⁸ reported that nearly two-thirds of patients diagnosed with PPP syndrome have minimal to absent abdominal symptoms that often lead to misdiagnosis and affect the overall prognosis of patients with pancreatic disease. Any delay in the diagnosis of PPP syndrome leads to a worse prognosis, with a mortality rate reported to be approximately 24%.⁸ Potts et al⁵ provided a review of 27 patients with pancreatic panniculitis in which all 8 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 42% (8/19) of patients with pancreatitis died.

Pancreatic panniculitis in the setting of PPP syndrome commonly presents with erythematous to brown, exquisitely tender, edematous, subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs. Lesions can range in size from several millimeters to 5 cm. The subcutaneous nodules may spontaneously ulcerate and exude oily viscous material from the liquefactive necrosis of adipocytes. In approximately 40% of patients, skin lesions are the presenting feature.¹¹ Lesions typically resolve only after the pancreatic inflammation regresses, leaving behind atrophic hyperpigmented scars.³ Other presenting symptoms may include joint pain, pitting edema, and subcutaneous nodules, which can precede the diagnosis by up to 9 months.

The exact pathogenesis of PPP syndrome remains unclear. The most widely recognized hypothesis suggests that pancreatic enzymes (eg, trypsin, amylase, lipase, phospholipase A) released from the damaged pancreas are transported through the bloodstream to distant visceral and soft tissue sites, leading to lipolysis and inflammation to the surrounding subcutis and bone marrow.³ Ferrari et al¹² reported this effect as a product of the accumulation of high levels of free fatty acids within the joint space by the action of lipolytic pancreatic enzymes on adipose cell membranes, resulting in acute arthritis.

Histopathologic findings of pancreatic panniculitis vary based on the acuity of the disease. Acute lesions typically demonstrate lobular and septal panniculitis. Szymanski and Bluefarb¹³ described the pathognomonic histologic findings of focal liquefactive necrosis and anucleate necrotic adipocytes surrounded by a shadowy and thickened cell membrane signifying the characteristic ghost cells. Fine basophilic material also may be seen intermixed with the necrotic adipocytes, representing saponified calcium. A brisk inflammatory infiltrate involving lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils tends to surround the areas of necrotic adipocytes. Chronic lesions often demonstrate a paucity of fat necrosis and ghost cells and more granulomatous infiltrate. Langerhans giant cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes predominate in the subcutaneous fat.

Laboratory findings associated with pancreatic panniculitis may include elevated serum amylase, lipase, and/or trypsin levels. Not all the enzymes have to be elevated simultaneously. On occasion, one enzyme may be within reference range while the others are elevated. Rarely, patients may have an elevated lipase level with no signs of underlying pancreatic disease, which demonstrates that panniculitis does not correlate with the enzyme levels. In all cases of suspected pancreatic panniculitis, a complete laboratory workup is recommended including lipase, amylase, and trypsin serum levels. Eosinophilia may be a prominent finding in patients with pancreatic panniculitis and tends to occur in association with an underlying pancreatic carcinoma. Patients with pancreatic panniculitis associated with pancreatic carcinoma tend to have more severe, diffuse, and persistent subcutaneous nodules that often are refractory to treatment with frequent recurrence. A rare constellation of findings known as Schmid triad is comprised of panniculitis, polyarthritis, and eosinophilia and typically portends a poor prognosis secondary to an underlying pancreatic tumor.¹⁴ Cutaneous nodules may predate the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma by several months, thus signifying the need for a high index of suspicion in patients with lower leg subcutaneous nodules.

Joint disease most commonly involves the ankles, knees, wrists, and MCP joints.^5,6,11 It has been suggested that arthritic symptoms are from periarticular fat necrosis or a direct extension from the necrotic subcutaneous tissue to the adjacent joint space.¹⁵ Dahl et al³ reported the composition of joint effusion fluid in 3 patients with PPP syndrome. The aspirate in all 3 patients contained viscous yellow material similar to the necrotic adipose tissue seen draining from subcutaneous nodules. Joint aspirate analysis demonstrated increased concentration of free fatty acids in the joint fluid consistent with severe lipolysis.³

The PPP syndrome acronym may be misleading to physicians, as arthritis is not always polyarticular. Dahl et al³ reported that monoarticular or oligoarticular arthritic symptoms were present in 56% of patients studied. In rare cases, the arthritic symptoms antedated the diagnosis of clinically asymptomatic pancreatic disease. Arthritis can be either symmetric or asymmetric and infrequently follows a chronic course, leading to radiographic lytic lesions and symptoms that often are unresponsive to conventional therapy.¹⁶

Treatment of PPP syndrome is largely supportive, with a focus on correcting the underlying pancreatic disease. It is imperative to identify any complicating factors contributing to high levels of circulating pancreatic enzymes. Pseudocysts must be addressed if discovered in these patients, as they often perpetuate the substantial release of pancreatic enzymes into the serum, leading to characteristic subcutaneous fat necrosis and arthritis. Sepsis also is a concern, likely secondary to bacterial colonization of the ulcerated subcutaneous nodules and compromised skin barrier. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids have been used for symptomatic relief but usually are ineffective and have not been shown to reduce the duration of the disease.^12,16 Octreotide has been utilized and may potentially reduce pancreatic enzyme secretion leading to improvement in cutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions.¹⁷ Plasmapheresis has been used as an adjuvant treatment in patients with persistent hyperamylasemia and hyperlipasemia, but reports are anecdotal. Often reserved for severe disease, cholecystectomy, pancreatic duct removal, and pancreaticoduodenectomy have demonstrated success in the management of chronic pancreatitis and panniculitis. Dahl et al³ reported 2 cases in which cholecystectomy was performed with complete resolution of the skin and pancreatic disease. Our patient was initially treated symptomatically with NSAIDs and corticosteroids but there was no clinical response. The patient eventually underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy 9 months after the onset of symptoms with complete resolution of joint pain and swelling, greater than 50% resolution of his lower leg subcutaneous nodules, and remarkable reduction in amylase and lipase levels on 1-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis syndrome is a rare diagnosis characterized by a triad of pancreatic panniculitis, pancreatitis, and polyarthritis. Adjuvant therapies for PPP syndrome, such as NSAIDs, corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and octreotide, have been used with equivocal results, but definitive treatment requires correction of the primary pancreatic disorder. More importantly, many pancreatic diseases can cause pancreatic panniculitis, but extensive, refractory, or ulcerated cases could be an early indicator of an occult pancreatic malignancy and should prompt early evaluation with a multidisciplinary approach. This approach should incorporate management from dermatology, internal medicine, rheumatology, gastroenterology, surgery, and primary care.