Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:56
Display Headline
What is the optimal timing of elective cesarean delivery at term?

Approximately 1.3 million cesarean deliveries are performed each year in the United States—40% of them repeat procedures. As the number of cesarean deliveries continues to rise, the timing of elective cesarean delivery—including the increasing percentage of repeat cesareans—gains even more importance. The study by Tita and colleagues focuses on this population.

Unless fetal lung maturity has been confirmed, elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation is associated with a higher rate of neonatal respiratory problems. In this observational study, performed at 19 US centers from 1999 to 2002, and funded by the National Institutes of Health, infants of women who underwent elective cesarean delivery at 37 or more weeks’ gestation were assessed for the primary outcome—a composite neonatal outcome that included the occurrence of any of the following:

  • death
  • respiratory distress syndrome
  • transient tachypnea of the newborn
  • hypoglycemia
  • newborn sepsis
  • confirmed seizures
  • necrotizing enterocolitis
  • hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation or ventilator support within 24 hours of birth
  • umbilical cord–blood arterial pH
  • 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or below
  • admission to NICU
  • hospitalization for 5 or more days.

Of 13,258 elective cesarean deliveries performed at term, 35.8% occurred before 39 completed weeks of gestation (6.3% at 37 weeks, 29.5% at 38 weeks) and 49.1% at 39 weeks. Women who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be married, white, and to have initiated prenatal care early.

Compared with infants delivered at 39 weeks, those born at 37 to 38 weeks’ gestation had a greater risk of the primary (composite) outcome. At 37 weeks, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–2.5). At 38 weeks, the adjusted OR was 1.5 (1.3–1.7).

The authors estimated that, at 37 weeks’ gestation, postponing elective delivery until 39 weeks might prevent 48% of cases of the primary outcome; this percentage was estimated to be 27% at 38 weeks’ gestation.

Patient preference determines timing in some cases

Cesarean delivery accounts for almost one third of US births, and most women who have had such a delivery opt to repeat it in their next pregnancy. As an editorial accompanying this article points out, women in this study who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be private patients and had likely asked their own obstetrician to perform the delivery.1 Obstetricians who wish to promote patient satisfaction are likely to honor such a request, recognizing that waiting until later would increase the likelihood of labor, which would exclude the possibility of an elective procedure.

Limitations of the study

Because this study lacked data about testing for fetal lung maturity, it is unclear whether the higher rate of adverse outcomes with elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks could be explained by failure to assess for fetal lung maturity.

It also appears that the delay of delivery to 39 weeks or beyond may be associated with an increased risk of stillbirth. In other populations, this risk has been estimated to be roughly 0.5 of every 1,000 births for each advancing week of gestation.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Obstetricians and their patients should weigh the known risks of elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation against the small risk of late stillbirth. At the same time, it is important to factor in the patient’s preferences about when delivery occurs and who performs it.—ANDREW M. KAUNITZ, MD

References

1. Greene MF. Making small risks even smaller [editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:183-184.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

39 weeks This multicenter cohort study found that, when elective cesarean delivery was performed at term (37 weeks or more) but before 39 weeks’ gestation, the likelihood of respiratory complications, newborn sepsis, NICU admission, and other adverse outcomes increased by a factor of 1.8 to 4.2 for births at 37 weeks, and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.1 for births at 38 weeks, compared with delivery at 39 weeks. However, the only death in the study involved an infant delivered at 39 weeks’ gestation.

Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al, for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–120.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD
Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Issue
OBG Management - 21(04)
Publications
Page Number
20-21
Legacy Keywords
Andrew M. Kaunitz MD; Examining the Evidence; elective cesarean delivery; optimal timing; cesarean delivery; respiratory complications; newborn sepsis; NICU admission; fetal lung maturity; National Institutes of Health; neonatal outcome; stillbirth; patient satisfaction; adverse outcomes; primary outcome
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

39 weeks This multicenter cohort study found that, when elective cesarean delivery was performed at term (37 weeks or more) but before 39 weeks’ gestation, the likelihood of respiratory complications, newborn sepsis, NICU admission, and other adverse outcomes increased by a factor of 1.8 to 4.2 for births at 37 weeks, and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.1 for births at 38 weeks, compared with delivery at 39 weeks. However, the only death in the study involved an infant delivered at 39 weeks’ gestation.

Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al, for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–120.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD
Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Author and Disclosure Information

39 weeks This multicenter cohort study found that, when elective cesarean delivery was performed at term (37 weeks or more) but before 39 weeks’ gestation, the likelihood of respiratory complications, newborn sepsis, NICU admission, and other adverse outcomes increased by a factor of 1.8 to 4.2 for births at 37 weeks, and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.1 for births at 38 weeks, compared with delivery at 39 weeks. However, the only death in the study involved an infant delivered at 39 weeks’ gestation.

Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al, for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–120.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD
Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine–Jacksonville. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Approximately 1.3 million cesarean deliveries are performed each year in the United States—40% of them repeat procedures. As the number of cesarean deliveries continues to rise, the timing of elective cesarean delivery—including the increasing percentage of repeat cesareans—gains even more importance. The study by Tita and colleagues focuses on this population.

Unless fetal lung maturity has been confirmed, elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation is associated with a higher rate of neonatal respiratory problems. In this observational study, performed at 19 US centers from 1999 to 2002, and funded by the National Institutes of Health, infants of women who underwent elective cesarean delivery at 37 or more weeks’ gestation were assessed for the primary outcome—a composite neonatal outcome that included the occurrence of any of the following:

  • death
  • respiratory distress syndrome
  • transient tachypnea of the newborn
  • hypoglycemia
  • newborn sepsis
  • confirmed seizures
  • necrotizing enterocolitis
  • hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation or ventilator support within 24 hours of birth
  • umbilical cord–blood arterial pH
  • 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or below
  • admission to NICU
  • hospitalization for 5 or more days.

Of 13,258 elective cesarean deliveries performed at term, 35.8% occurred before 39 completed weeks of gestation (6.3% at 37 weeks, 29.5% at 38 weeks) and 49.1% at 39 weeks. Women who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be married, white, and to have initiated prenatal care early.

Compared with infants delivered at 39 weeks, those born at 37 to 38 weeks’ gestation had a greater risk of the primary (composite) outcome. At 37 weeks, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–2.5). At 38 weeks, the adjusted OR was 1.5 (1.3–1.7).

The authors estimated that, at 37 weeks’ gestation, postponing elective delivery until 39 weeks might prevent 48% of cases of the primary outcome; this percentage was estimated to be 27% at 38 weeks’ gestation.

Patient preference determines timing in some cases

Cesarean delivery accounts for almost one third of US births, and most women who have had such a delivery opt to repeat it in their next pregnancy. As an editorial accompanying this article points out, women in this study who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be private patients and had likely asked their own obstetrician to perform the delivery.1 Obstetricians who wish to promote patient satisfaction are likely to honor such a request, recognizing that waiting until later would increase the likelihood of labor, which would exclude the possibility of an elective procedure.

Limitations of the study

Because this study lacked data about testing for fetal lung maturity, it is unclear whether the higher rate of adverse outcomes with elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks could be explained by failure to assess for fetal lung maturity.

It also appears that the delay of delivery to 39 weeks or beyond may be associated with an increased risk of stillbirth. In other populations, this risk has been estimated to be roughly 0.5 of every 1,000 births for each advancing week of gestation.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Obstetricians and their patients should weigh the known risks of elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation against the small risk of late stillbirth. At the same time, it is important to factor in the patient’s preferences about when delivery occurs and who performs it.—ANDREW M. KAUNITZ, MD

Approximately 1.3 million cesarean deliveries are performed each year in the United States—40% of them repeat procedures. As the number of cesarean deliveries continues to rise, the timing of elective cesarean delivery—including the increasing percentage of repeat cesareans—gains even more importance. The study by Tita and colleagues focuses on this population.

Unless fetal lung maturity has been confirmed, elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation is associated with a higher rate of neonatal respiratory problems. In this observational study, performed at 19 US centers from 1999 to 2002, and funded by the National Institutes of Health, infants of women who underwent elective cesarean delivery at 37 or more weeks’ gestation were assessed for the primary outcome—a composite neonatal outcome that included the occurrence of any of the following:

  • death
  • respiratory distress syndrome
  • transient tachypnea of the newborn
  • hypoglycemia
  • newborn sepsis
  • confirmed seizures
  • necrotizing enterocolitis
  • hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation or ventilator support within 24 hours of birth
  • umbilical cord–blood arterial pH
  • 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or below
  • admission to NICU
  • hospitalization for 5 or more days.

Of 13,258 elective cesarean deliveries performed at term, 35.8% occurred before 39 completed weeks of gestation (6.3% at 37 weeks, 29.5% at 38 weeks) and 49.1% at 39 weeks. Women who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be married, white, and to have initiated prenatal care early.

Compared with infants delivered at 39 weeks, those born at 37 to 38 weeks’ gestation had a greater risk of the primary (composite) outcome. At 37 weeks, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–2.5). At 38 weeks, the adjusted OR was 1.5 (1.3–1.7).

The authors estimated that, at 37 weeks’ gestation, postponing elective delivery until 39 weeks might prevent 48% of cases of the primary outcome; this percentage was estimated to be 27% at 38 weeks’ gestation.

Patient preference determines timing in some cases

Cesarean delivery accounts for almost one third of US births, and most women who have had such a delivery opt to repeat it in their next pregnancy. As an editorial accompanying this article points out, women in this study who delivered before 39 weeks were more likely to be private patients and had likely asked their own obstetrician to perform the delivery.1 Obstetricians who wish to promote patient satisfaction are likely to honor such a request, recognizing that waiting until later would increase the likelihood of labor, which would exclude the possibility of an elective procedure.

Limitations of the study

Because this study lacked data about testing for fetal lung maturity, it is unclear whether the higher rate of adverse outcomes with elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks could be explained by failure to assess for fetal lung maturity.

It also appears that the delay of delivery to 39 weeks or beyond may be associated with an increased risk of stillbirth. In other populations, this risk has been estimated to be roughly 0.5 of every 1,000 births for each advancing week of gestation.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Obstetricians and their patients should weigh the known risks of elective cesarean delivery before 39 weeks’ gestation against the small risk of late stillbirth. At the same time, it is important to factor in the patient’s preferences about when delivery occurs and who performs it.—ANDREW M. KAUNITZ, MD

References

1. Greene MF. Making small risks even smaller [editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:183-184.

References

1. Greene MF. Making small risks even smaller [editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:183-184.

Issue
OBG Management - 21(04)
Issue
OBG Management - 21(04)
Page Number
20-21
Page Number
20-21
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
What is the optimal timing of elective cesarean delivery at term?
Display Headline
What is the optimal timing of elective cesarean delivery at term?
Legacy Keywords
Andrew M. Kaunitz MD; Examining the Evidence; elective cesarean delivery; optimal timing; cesarean delivery; respiratory complications; newborn sepsis; NICU admission; fetal lung maturity; National Institutes of Health; neonatal outcome; stillbirth; patient satisfaction; adverse outcomes; primary outcome
Legacy Keywords
Andrew M. Kaunitz MD; Examining the Evidence; elective cesarean delivery; optimal timing; cesarean delivery; respiratory complications; newborn sepsis; NICU admission; fetal lung maturity; National Institutes of Health; neonatal outcome; stillbirth; patient satisfaction; adverse outcomes; primary outcome
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media