Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/09/2023 - 15:22
Display Headline
Should antenatal testing be performed in patients with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 35?

Evidence summary

Association between higher maternal BMI and increased risk for stillbirth

The purpose of antenatal testing is to decrease the risk for stillbirth between visits. Because of the resources involved and the risk for false-positives when testing low-risk patients, antenatal testing is reserved for pregnant people with higher risk for stillbirth.

In a retrospective cohort study of more than 2.8 million singleton births including 9030 stillbirths, pregnant people with an ­elevated BMI had an increased risk for stillbirth compared to those with a normal BMI. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.62-1.83) for those with a BMI of 30.0 to 34.9; 2.04 (95% CI, 1.8-2.21) for those with a BMI of 35.0 to 39.9; and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.28-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 40.1

A meta-analysis of 38 studies, which included data on 16,274 stillbirths, found that a 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with an increased risk for stillbirth (relative risk, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18-1.30).2

Another meta-analysis included 6 cohort studies involving more than 1 million pregnancies and 3 case-control studies involving 2530 stillbirths and 2837 controls from 1980-2005. There was an association between increasing BMI and stillbirth: the odds ratio (OR) was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.59-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.3

However, a retrospective cohort study of 182,362 singleton births including 442 stillbirths found no association between stillbirth and increasing BMI. The OR was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.87-1.37) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.4 However, this cohort study may have been underpowered to detect an association between stillbirth and BMI.

Recommendations from others

In 2021, ACOG suggested that weekly antenatal testing may be considered from 34w0d for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40.0 and from 37w0d for pregnant people with a BMI between 35.0 and 39.9.5 The 2021 ACOG Practice Bulletin on Obesity in Pregnancy rates this recommendation as Level C—based primarily on consensus and expert opinion.6

A 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Green-top Guideline recognizes “definitive recommendations for fetal surveillance are hampered by the lack of randomized controlled trials demonstrating that antepartum fetal surveillance decreases perinatal morbidity or mortality in late-term and post-term gestations…. There are no definitive studies determining the optimal type or frequency of such testing and no evidence specific for women with obesity.”7

A 2019 Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada practice guideline states “stillbirth is more common with maternal obesity” and recommends “increased fetal surveillance … in the third trimester if reduced fetal movements are reported.” The guideline notes “the role for non-stress tests … in surveillance of well-being in this population is uncertain.” Also, for pregnant people with a BMI > 30, “assessment of fetal well-being is … recommended weekly from 37 weeks until delivery.” Finally, increased fetal surveillance is recommended in the setting of increased BMI and an abnormal pulsatility index of the umbilical artery and/or maternal uterine artery.8

Editor’s takeaway

Evidence demonstrates that increased maternal BMI is associated with increased stillbirths. However, evidence has not shown that third-trimester antenatal testing decreases this morbidity and mortality. Expert opinion varies, with ACOG recommending weekly antenatal testing from 34 and 37 weeks for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40 and of 35 to 39.9, respectively.

References

1. Yao R, Ananth C, Park B, et al; Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog. 2014.01.044

2. Aune D, Saugstad O, Henriksen T, et al. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311:1536-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269

3. Chu S, Kim S, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.027

4. Mahomed K, Chan G, Norton M. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth—a reappraisal—a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;255:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2020.09.044

5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Indications for outpatient antenatal fetal surveillance: ACOG committee opinion, number 828. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e177-e197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004407

6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Obesity in pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin, number 230. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e128-e144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004395

7. Denison F, Aedla N, Keag O, et al; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Care of women with obesity in pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 72. BJOG. 2019;126:e62-e106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15386

8. Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline No. 391–Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 1: pre-conception and prenatal care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:1623-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc. 2019.03.026

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Lee Dresang, MD
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

Lia Vellardita, MA
Ebling Library, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

DEPUTY EDITOR
Rick Guthmann, MD, MPH

Advocate Health Care Illinois Masonic Medical Center Program, Chicago

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 72(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
95-96
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Lee Dresang, MD
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

Lia Vellardita, MA
Ebling Library, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

DEPUTY EDITOR
Rick Guthmann, MD, MPH

Advocate Health Care Illinois Masonic Medical Center Program, Chicago

Author and Disclosure Information

Lee Dresang, MD
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

Lia Vellardita, MA
Ebling Library, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

DEPUTY EDITOR
Rick Guthmann, MD, MPH

Advocate Health Care Illinois Masonic Medical Center Program, Chicago

Article PDF
Article PDF

Evidence summary

Association between higher maternal BMI and increased risk for stillbirth

The purpose of antenatal testing is to decrease the risk for stillbirth between visits. Because of the resources involved and the risk for false-positives when testing low-risk patients, antenatal testing is reserved for pregnant people with higher risk for stillbirth.

In a retrospective cohort study of more than 2.8 million singleton births including 9030 stillbirths, pregnant people with an ­elevated BMI had an increased risk for stillbirth compared to those with a normal BMI. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.62-1.83) for those with a BMI of 30.0 to 34.9; 2.04 (95% CI, 1.8-2.21) for those with a BMI of 35.0 to 39.9; and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.28-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 40.1

A meta-analysis of 38 studies, which included data on 16,274 stillbirths, found that a 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with an increased risk for stillbirth (relative risk, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18-1.30).2

Another meta-analysis included 6 cohort studies involving more than 1 million pregnancies and 3 case-control studies involving 2530 stillbirths and 2837 controls from 1980-2005. There was an association between increasing BMI and stillbirth: the odds ratio (OR) was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.59-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.3

However, a retrospective cohort study of 182,362 singleton births including 442 stillbirths found no association between stillbirth and increasing BMI. The OR was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.87-1.37) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.4 However, this cohort study may have been underpowered to detect an association between stillbirth and BMI.

Recommendations from others

In 2021, ACOG suggested that weekly antenatal testing may be considered from 34w0d for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40.0 and from 37w0d for pregnant people with a BMI between 35.0 and 39.9.5 The 2021 ACOG Practice Bulletin on Obesity in Pregnancy rates this recommendation as Level C—based primarily on consensus and expert opinion.6

A 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Green-top Guideline recognizes “definitive recommendations for fetal surveillance are hampered by the lack of randomized controlled trials demonstrating that antepartum fetal surveillance decreases perinatal morbidity or mortality in late-term and post-term gestations…. There are no definitive studies determining the optimal type or frequency of such testing and no evidence specific for women with obesity.”7

A 2019 Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada practice guideline states “stillbirth is more common with maternal obesity” and recommends “increased fetal surveillance … in the third trimester if reduced fetal movements are reported.” The guideline notes “the role for non-stress tests … in surveillance of well-being in this population is uncertain.” Also, for pregnant people with a BMI > 30, “assessment of fetal well-being is … recommended weekly from 37 weeks until delivery.” Finally, increased fetal surveillance is recommended in the setting of increased BMI and an abnormal pulsatility index of the umbilical artery and/or maternal uterine artery.8

Editor’s takeaway

Evidence demonstrates that increased maternal BMI is associated with increased stillbirths. However, evidence has not shown that third-trimester antenatal testing decreases this morbidity and mortality. Expert opinion varies, with ACOG recommending weekly antenatal testing from 34 and 37 weeks for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40 and of 35 to 39.9, respectively.

Evidence summary

Association between higher maternal BMI and increased risk for stillbirth

The purpose of antenatal testing is to decrease the risk for stillbirth between visits. Because of the resources involved and the risk for false-positives when testing low-risk patients, antenatal testing is reserved for pregnant people with higher risk for stillbirth.

In a retrospective cohort study of more than 2.8 million singleton births including 9030 stillbirths, pregnant people with an ­elevated BMI had an increased risk for stillbirth compared to those with a normal BMI. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.62-1.83) for those with a BMI of 30.0 to 34.9; 2.04 (95% CI, 1.8-2.21) for those with a BMI of 35.0 to 39.9; and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.28-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 40.1

A meta-analysis of 38 studies, which included data on 16,274 stillbirths, found that a 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with an increased risk for stillbirth (relative risk, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18-1.30).2

Another meta-analysis included 6 cohort studies involving more than 1 million pregnancies and 3 case-control studies involving 2530 stillbirths and 2837 controls from 1980-2005. There was an association between increasing BMI and stillbirth: the odds ratio (OR) was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.59-2.74) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.3

However, a retrospective cohort study of 182,362 singleton births including 442 stillbirths found no association between stillbirth and increasing BMI. The OR was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for those with a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.87-1.37) for those with a BMI ≥ 30.0, compared to those with a normal BMI.4 However, this cohort study may have been underpowered to detect an association between stillbirth and BMI.

Recommendations from others

In 2021, ACOG suggested that weekly antenatal testing may be considered from 34w0d for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40.0 and from 37w0d for pregnant people with a BMI between 35.0 and 39.9.5 The 2021 ACOG Practice Bulletin on Obesity in Pregnancy rates this recommendation as Level C—based primarily on consensus and expert opinion.6

A 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Green-top Guideline recognizes “definitive recommendations for fetal surveillance are hampered by the lack of randomized controlled trials demonstrating that antepartum fetal surveillance decreases perinatal morbidity or mortality in late-term and post-term gestations…. There are no definitive studies determining the optimal type or frequency of such testing and no evidence specific for women with obesity.”7

A 2019 Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada practice guideline states “stillbirth is more common with maternal obesity” and recommends “increased fetal surveillance … in the third trimester if reduced fetal movements are reported.” The guideline notes “the role for non-stress tests … in surveillance of well-being in this population is uncertain.” Also, for pregnant people with a BMI > 30, “assessment of fetal well-being is … recommended weekly from 37 weeks until delivery.” Finally, increased fetal surveillance is recommended in the setting of increased BMI and an abnormal pulsatility index of the umbilical artery and/or maternal uterine artery.8

Editor’s takeaway

Evidence demonstrates that increased maternal BMI is associated with increased stillbirths. However, evidence has not shown that third-trimester antenatal testing decreases this morbidity and mortality. Expert opinion varies, with ACOG recommending weekly antenatal testing from 34 and 37 weeks for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40 and of 35 to 39.9, respectively.

References

1. Yao R, Ananth C, Park B, et al; Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog. 2014.01.044

2. Aune D, Saugstad O, Henriksen T, et al. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311:1536-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269

3. Chu S, Kim S, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.027

4. Mahomed K, Chan G, Norton M. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth—a reappraisal—a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;255:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2020.09.044

5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Indications for outpatient antenatal fetal surveillance: ACOG committee opinion, number 828. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e177-e197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004407

6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Obesity in pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin, number 230. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e128-e144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004395

7. Denison F, Aedla N, Keag O, et al; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Care of women with obesity in pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 72. BJOG. 2019;126:e62-e106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15386

8. Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline No. 391–Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 1: pre-conception and prenatal care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:1623-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc. 2019.03.026

References

1. Yao R, Ananth C, Park B, et al; Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog. 2014.01.044

2. Aune D, Saugstad O, Henriksen T, et al. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311:1536-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269

3. Chu S, Kim S, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.027

4. Mahomed K, Chan G, Norton M. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth—a reappraisal—a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;255:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2020.09.044

5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Indications for outpatient antenatal fetal surveillance: ACOG committee opinion, number 828. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e177-e197. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004407

6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Obesity in pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin, number 230. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e128-e144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004395

7. Denison F, Aedla N, Keag O, et al; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Care of women with obesity in pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 72. BJOG. 2019;126:e62-e106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15386

8. Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline No. 391–Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 1: pre-conception and prenatal care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:1623-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc. 2019.03.026

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 72(2)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 72(2)
Page Number
95-96
Page Number
95-96
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Should antenatal testing be performed in patients with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 35?
Display Headline
Should antenatal testing be performed in patients with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 35?
Sections
PURLs Copyright
Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network
Inside the Article

EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW:

Possibly. Elevated BMI is associated with an increased risk for stillbirth (strength of recommendation [SOR], B; cohort studies and meta-analysis of cohort studies). Three studies found an association between elevated BMI and stillbirth and one did not. However, no studies demonstrate that antenatal testing in pregnant people with higher BMIs decreases stillbirth rates, or that no harm is caused by unnecessary testing or resultant interventions.

Still, in 2021, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggested weekly antenatal testing may be considered from 34w0d for pregnant people with a BMI ≥ 40.0 and from 37w0d for pregnant people with a BMI between 35.0 and 39.9 (SOR, C; consensus guideline). Thus, doing the antenatal testing recommended in the ACOG guideline in an attempt to prevent stillbirth is reasonable, given evidence that elevated BMI is associated with stillbirth.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media