Resident participation linked to more postsurgery complications

BOSTON – Resident participation in emergency general surgery cases was independently associated with a host of complications – pulmonary embolism, surgical site infections, and unplanned reoperation in a secondary analysis of the American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database.

Adequate exposure of residents to emergency general surgery is crucial for surgical training, but academic operating teams should be mindful of this association, Dr. George Kasotakis said at the annual meeting of the American Surgical Association.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

Three recent papers have shown resident participation modestly increases complications in elective surgery, but their impact is not well understood for emergency general surgery, where patient physiology is typically deranged and timely surgery is imperative.

To examine this, Dr. Kasotakis and his colleagues at Boston University identified 141,010 patients who underwent emergency general surgery procedures in the 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Due to the nonrandom assignment of more complex cases to resident participation, patients were matched 1:1 based on age; gender; use of alcohol, tobacco, and steroids; inpatient status; obesity; diabetes; renal failure; cardiopulmonary disease; and expected probability for morbidity and mortality. Regression models were fitted for each outcome and adjusted for the same risk factors and operative time.

The most common procedures in the matched cohort were appendectomy (40%), exploratory laparotomy (8.75%), bowel resection (9.2%), cholecystectomy (6%), and lysis of adhesions (6%).

Thirty-day mortality was similar with and without residents (3.25% vs. 2.96%; P = .082), but hospital length of stay was longer by about a half a day with residents (4.97 days vs. 4.59 days; P = .019), said Dr. Kasotakis, an acute care surgeon and intensivist.

More importantly, resident participation added about 20 minutes to operative (75 minutes vs. 59 minutes; P less than .001) and anesthesia times (122 minutes vs. 100 minutes; P less than .001).

Intraoperative transfusions were more common with residents (3.43% vs. 2.55%; P less than .001), perhaps because of longer operating room times, and, as a result, fewer postoperative transfusions were needed (1.12% vs. 1.28% P = .031), he said. Unplanned reoperations, however, were more common with residents, as well (4.22% vs. 3.80%; P = .002).

Postsurgical superficial wound infections (3.5% vs. 2.78%; P less than .001) and organ space surgical site infections (2.27% vs. 1.77%; P less than .001) were more common in the resident group, while wound dehiscence was not (0.63% vs. 0.69%; P = .266), Dr. Kasotakis noted.

Pulmonary complications were significantly more common in the resident group including postoperative pneumonia (1.85% vs. 1.67%; P = .04), reintubation (1.64% vs. 1.15%; P less than .001), and mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours (2.87% vs. 2.06%; P less than .001).

The same was true for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (0.80% vs. 0.62%; P = .002) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.43% vs. 0.28%; P less than .001).

Urinary tract infections (UTI) were higher with resident participation (1.45% vs. 1.14%; P less than .001), as was sepsis (2.42% vs. 2.13%; P = .005), likely because of the increase in surgical infections, Dr. Kasotakis said.

Thankfully, significant cardiac complications and septic shock were not more common with residents, he said.

Adjusted analyses

After adjusting for operative duration, case complexity and pre-existing comorbidities, residents did not increase length of stay (odds ratio, 0.07; P = .242) or septic events (OR, 1.07; P = .155), but their participation was still independently associated with about 20% more superficial surgical site infections (odds ratio, 1.23; P less than .001), organ space infections (OR, 1.21; P less than .001), UTIs (OR, 1.23; P = .001), and intraoperative transfusions (OR, 1.20; P = .001), he said.

Also, about 8% more patients required a return trip to the operating room when residents participated (OR, 1.08; P = .041).

"These outcomes can perhaps be attributed to their underdeveloped surgical skills," Dr. Kasotakis said.

The incidence of DVT and PE were also higher by about 25% (OR, 1.25; P = .011) and 40% (OR, 1.42; P = .005), respectively, perhaps because of delayed DVT prophylaxis initiation because of concerns of hemostasis or missed doses due to additional return trips to the emergency department, he suggested.

Interestingly, reintubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation rates were increased by about 40% (OR, 1.38; OR, 1.43; both P less than .001), perhaps due to prolonged operative times or greater resuscitation requirements, he added.

Dr. Kasotakis was quick to point out that this was a secondary analysis of a data set not originally intended to assess the effect of trainee participation, that no information was available on the degree of resident involvement during surgery or in perioperative care, and that participating institutions were skewed toward tertiary centers, which typically receive more complex cases.

"Staff surgeons should supervise as needed and minimize unnecessary [emergency department] time. And residents, for their part, should be well prepared for emergency procedures through simulation training and aim to maximize their operating room efficiency," he suggested.

The results sparked a flurry of rebuttals led off by discussant Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, chief of endocrine surgery and director of health sciences research at Duke University, Durham, N.C., who said they conflict with other analyses showing little to no impact from residents in elective cases.

"If not interpreted with care, policy makers, payers, and the public could construe that surgical care at academic health centers is compromised by trainees, which could have unfortunate ramifications for everyone in the room as well as the trainees and the patients," she said.

Dr. Sosa expressed concern about drawing causal inferences from an observational study in the setting of possible selection bias and said attempts to match for case complexity using CPT codes do not necessarily account for say, "the difference between a routine appendectomy that takes 15 to 30 minutes and a complex one that takes 3 hours for a perforation."

Some attendees questioned why the authors didn’t match the institutions in the analysis and chose to ascribe all of the outcomes to residents, with a round of applause following the suggestion that the paper should be entitled Academic centers increase emergency surgery complications. Other attendees questioned whether the poor outcomes are a reflection of resident training and supervision.

Finally, Dr. George Velmahos, chief of trauma, emergency surgery, and surgical critical care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, questioned whether, based on these findings, hospitals have a responsibility from a medical/legal standpoint to inform emergency surgery patients that a resident is in the operating room and may impact outcomes.

Dr. Kasotakis responded that institutions may want to add a clause to consent paperwork stating that residents and trainees will be participating in the case.

The complete manuscript of this study and its presentation at the American Surgical Association’s 134^th Annual Meeting, April 2014, in Boston, is anticipated to be published in the Annals of Surgery, pending editorial review.

Dr. Kasotakis and his coauthors reported no conflicting interests.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

BOSTON – Resident participation in emergency general surgery cases was independently associated with a host of complications – pulmonary embolism, surgical site infections, and unplanned reoperation in a secondary analysis of the American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database.

Adequate exposure of residents to emergency general surgery is crucial for surgical training, but academic operating teams should be mindful of this association, Dr. George Kasotakis said at the annual meeting of the American Surgical Association.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

Three recent papers have shown resident participation modestly increases complications in elective surgery, but their impact is not well understood for emergency general surgery, where patient physiology is typically deranged and timely surgery is imperative.

To examine this, Dr. Kasotakis and his colleagues at Boston University identified 141,010 patients who underwent emergency general surgery procedures in the 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Due to the nonrandom assignment of more complex cases to resident participation, patients were matched 1:1 based on age; gender; use of alcohol, tobacco, and steroids; inpatient status; obesity; diabetes; renal failure; cardiopulmonary disease; and expected probability for morbidity and mortality. Regression models were fitted for each outcome and adjusted for the same risk factors and operative time.

The most common procedures in the matched cohort were appendectomy (40%), exploratory laparotomy (8.75%), bowel resection (9.2%), cholecystectomy (6%), and lysis of adhesions (6%).

Thirty-day mortality was similar with and without residents (3.25% vs. 2.96%; P = .082), but hospital length of stay was longer by about a half a day with residents (4.97 days vs. 4.59 days; P = .019), said Dr. Kasotakis, an acute care surgeon and intensivist.

More importantly, resident participation added about 20 minutes to operative (75 minutes vs. 59 minutes; P less than .001) and anesthesia times (122 minutes vs. 100 minutes; P less than .001).

Intraoperative transfusions were more common with residents (3.43% vs. 2.55%; P less than .001), perhaps because of longer operating room times, and, as a result, fewer postoperative transfusions were needed (1.12% vs. 1.28% P = .031), he said. Unplanned reoperations, however, were more common with residents, as well (4.22% vs. 3.80%; P = .002).

Postsurgical superficial wound infections (3.5% vs. 2.78%; P less than .001) and organ space surgical site infections (2.27% vs. 1.77%; P less than .001) were more common in the resident group, while wound dehiscence was not (0.63% vs. 0.69%; P = .266), Dr. Kasotakis noted.

Pulmonary complications were significantly more common in the resident group including postoperative pneumonia (1.85% vs. 1.67%; P = .04), reintubation (1.64% vs. 1.15%; P less than .001), and mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours (2.87% vs. 2.06%; P less than .001).

The same was true for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (0.80% vs. 0.62%; P = .002) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.43% vs. 0.28%; P less than .001).

Urinary tract infections (UTI) were higher with resident participation (1.45% vs. 1.14%; P less than .001), as was sepsis (2.42% vs. 2.13%; P = .005), likely because of the increase in surgical infections, Dr. Kasotakis said.

Thankfully, significant cardiac complications and septic shock were not more common with residents, he said.

Adjusted analyses

After adjusting for operative duration, case complexity and pre-existing comorbidities, residents did not increase length of stay (odds ratio, 0.07; P = .242) or septic events (OR, 1.07; P = .155), but their participation was still independently associated with about 20% more superficial surgical site infections (odds ratio, 1.23; P less than .001), organ space infections (OR, 1.21; P less than .001), UTIs (OR, 1.23; P = .001), and intraoperative transfusions (OR, 1.20; P = .001), he said.

Also, about 8% more patients required a return trip to the operating room when residents participated (OR, 1.08; P = .041).

"These outcomes can perhaps be attributed to their underdeveloped surgical skills," Dr. Kasotakis said.

The incidence of DVT and PE were also higher by about 25% (OR, 1.25; P = .011) and 40% (OR, 1.42; P = .005), respectively, perhaps because of delayed DVT prophylaxis initiation because of concerns of hemostasis or missed doses due to additional return trips to the emergency department, he suggested.

Interestingly, reintubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation rates were increased by about 40% (OR, 1.38; OR, 1.43; both P less than .001), perhaps due to prolonged operative times or greater resuscitation requirements, he added.

Dr. Kasotakis was quick to point out that this was a secondary analysis of a data set not originally intended to assess the effect of trainee participation, that no information was available on the degree of resident involvement during surgery or in perioperative care, and that participating institutions were skewed toward tertiary centers, which typically receive more complex cases.

"Staff surgeons should supervise as needed and minimize unnecessary [emergency department] time. And residents, for their part, should be well prepared for emergency procedures through simulation training and aim to maximize their operating room efficiency," he suggested.

The results sparked a flurry of rebuttals led off by discussant Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, chief of endocrine surgery and director of health sciences research at Duke University, Durham, N.C., who said they conflict with other analyses showing little to no impact from residents in elective cases.

"If not interpreted with care, policy makers, payers, and the public could construe that surgical care at academic health centers is compromised by trainees, which could have unfortunate ramifications for everyone in the room as well as the trainees and the patients," she said.

Dr. Sosa expressed concern about drawing causal inferences from an observational study in the setting of possible selection bias and said attempts to match for case complexity using CPT codes do not necessarily account for say, "the difference between a routine appendectomy that takes 15 to 30 minutes and a complex one that takes 3 hours for a perforation."

Some attendees questioned why the authors didn’t match the institutions in the analysis and chose to ascribe all of the outcomes to residents, with a round of applause following the suggestion that the paper should be entitled Academic centers increase emergency surgery complications. Other attendees questioned whether the poor outcomes are a reflection of resident training and supervision.

Finally, Dr. George Velmahos, chief of trauma, emergency surgery, and surgical critical care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, questioned whether, based on these findings, hospitals have a responsibility from a medical/legal standpoint to inform emergency surgery patients that a resident is in the operating room and may impact outcomes.

Dr. Kasotakis responded that institutions may want to add a clause to consent paperwork stating that residents and trainees will be participating in the case.

The complete manuscript of this study and its presentation at the American Surgical Association’s 134^th Annual Meeting, April 2014, in Boston, is anticipated to be published in the Annals of Surgery, pending editorial review.

Dr. Kasotakis and his coauthors reported no conflicting interests.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

BOSTON – Resident participation in emergency general surgery cases was independently associated with a host of complications – pulmonary embolism, surgical site infections, and unplanned reoperation in a secondary analysis of the American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database.

Adequate exposure of residents to emergency general surgery is crucial for surgical training, but academic operating teams should be mindful of this association, Dr. George Kasotakis said at the annual meeting of the American Surgical Association.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

Three recent papers have shown resident participation modestly increases complications in elective surgery, but their impact is not well understood for emergency general surgery, where patient physiology is typically deranged and timely surgery is imperative.

To examine this, Dr. Kasotakis and his colleagues at Boston University identified 141,010 patients who underwent emergency general surgery procedures in the 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Due to the nonrandom assignment of more complex cases to resident participation, patients were matched 1:1 based on age; gender; use of alcohol, tobacco, and steroids; inpatient status; obesity; diabetes; renal failure; cardiopulmonary disease; and expected probability for morbidity and mortality. Regression models were fitted for each outcome and adjusted for the same risk factors and operative time.

The most common procedures in the matched cohort were appendectomy (40%), exploratory laparotomy (8.75%), bowel resection (9.2%), cholecystectomy (6%), and lysis of adhesions (6%).

Thirty-day mortality was similar with and without residents (3.25% vs. 2.96%; P = .082), but hospital length of stay was longer by about a half a day with residents (4.97 days vs. 4.59 days; P = .019), said Dr. Kasotakis, an acute care surgeon and intensivist.

More importantly, resident participation added about 20 minutes to operative (75 minutes vs. 59 minutes; P less than .001) and anesthesia times (122 minutes vs. 100 minutes; P less than .001).

Intraoperative transfusions were more common with residents (3.43% vs. 2.55%; P less than .001), perhaps because of longer operating room times, and, as a result, fewer postoperative transfusions were needed (1.12% vs. 1.28% P = .031), he said. Unplanned reoperations, however, were more common with residents, as well (4.22% vs. 3.80%; P = .002).

Postsurgical superficial wound infections (3.5% vs. 2.78%; P less than .001) and organ space surgical site infections (2.27% vs. 1.77%; P less than .001) were more common in the resident group, while wound dehiscence was not (0.63% vs. 0.69%; P = .266), Dr. Kasotakis noted.

Pulmonary complications were significantly more common in the resident group including postoperative pneumonia (1.85% vs. 1.67%; P = .04), reintubation (1.64% vs. 1.15%; P less than .001), and mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours (2.87% vs. 2.06%; P less than .001).

The same was true for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (0.80% vs. 0.62%; P = .002) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.43% vs. 0.28%; P less than .001).

Urinary tract infections (UTI) were higher with resident participation (1.45% vs. 1.14%; P less than .001), as was sepsis (2.42% vs. 2.13%; P = .005), likely because of the increase in surgical infections, Dr. Kasotakis said.

Thankfully, significant cardiac complications and septic shock were not more common with residents, he said.

Adjusted analyses

After adjusting for operative duration, case complexity and pre-existing comorbidities, residents did not increase length of stay (odds ratio, 0.07; P = .242) or septic events (OR, 1.07; P = .155), but their participation was still independently associated with about 20% more superficial surgical site infections (odds ratio, 1.23; P less than .001), organ space infections (OR, 1.21; P less than .001), UTIs (OR, 1.23; P = .001), and intraoperative transfusions (OR, 1.20; P = .001), he said.

Also, about 8% more patients required a return trip to the operating room when residents participated (OR, 1.08; P = .041).

"These outcomes can perhaps be attributed to their underdeveloped surgical skills," Dr. Kasotakis said.

The incidence of DVT and PE were also higher by about 25% (OR, 1.25; P = .011) and 40% (OR, 1.42; P = .005), respectively, perhaps because of delayed DVT prophylaxis initiation because of concerns of hemostasis or missed doses due to additional return trips to the emergency department, he suggested.

Interestingly, reintubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation rates were increased by about 40% (OR, 1.38; OR, 1.43; both P less than .001), perhaps due to prolonged operative times or greater resuscitation requirements, he added.

Dr. Kasotakis was quick to point out that this was a secondary analysis of a data set not originally intended to assess the effect of trainee participation, that no information was available on the degree of resident involvement during surgery or in perioperative care, and that participating institutions were skewed toward tertiary centers, which typically receive more complex cases.

"Staff surgeons should supervise as needed and minimize unnecessary [emergency department] time. And residents, for their part, should be well prepared for emergency procedures through simulation training and aim to maximize their operating room efficiency," he suggested.

The results sparked a flurry of rebuttals led off by discussant Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, chief of endocrine surgery and director of health sciences research at Duke University, Durham, N.C., who said they conflict with other analyses showing little to no impact from residents in elective cases.

"If not interpreted with care, policy makers, payers, and the public could construe that surgical care at academic health centers is compromised by trainees, which could have unfortunate ramifications for everyone in the room as well as the trainees and the patients," she said.

Dr. Sosa expressed concern about drawing causal inferences from an observational study in the setting of possible selection bias and said attempts to match for case complexity using CPT codes do not necessarily account for say, "the difference between a routine appendectomy that takes 15 to 30 minutes and a complex one that takes 3 hours for a perforation."

Some attendees questioned why the authors didn’t match the institutions in the analysis and chose to ascribe all of the outcomes to residents, with a round of applause following the suggestion that the paper should be entitled Academic centers increase emergency surgery complications. Other attendees questioned whether the poor outcomes are a reflection of resident training and supervision.

Finally, Dr. George Velmahos, chief of trauma, emergency surgery, and surgical critical care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, questioned whether, based on these findings, hospitals have a responsibility from a medical/legal standpoint to inform emergency surgery patients that a resident is in the operating room and may impact outcomes.

Dr. Kasotakis responded that institutions may want to add a clause to consent paperwork stating that residents and trainees will be participating in the case.

The complete manuscript of this study and its presentation at the American Surgical Association’s 134^th Annual Meeting, April 2014, in Boston, is anticipated to be published in the Annals of Surgery, pending editorial review.

Dr. Kasotakis and his coauthors reported no conflicting interests.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com