Pros and Cons of Telemental Health Care

When telemental health care (TMH) works, it works well, the research agrees. For rural patients who often do not have easy access to health care TMH can be a lifesaver. The VA uses TMH to deliver care to veterans in rural VA medical centers, community-based outpatient clinics, and residential areas.  However, TMH is still relatively new in many rural communities, say researchers from University of Mississippi in Oxford and Augusta University in Georgia, and few studies have examined the delivery tool from an administrative standpoint. The literature suggests TMH will save money—the exploratory study, however, suggests otherwise.

The researchers interviewed 6 providers selected from the 15 community mental health (MH) centers (CMHCs) in rural Mississippi as well as an independent MH counselor who develops policy for the Mississippi Counselors Association. They asked respondents about the feasibility of TMH in the Mississippi Delta; in particular, the benefits, the costs, and the role of the state in facilitating the service. The researchers also collected data from a grant-funded pilot project conducted in the Mississippi Delta region by the Delta Health Alliance, a nonprofit organization in partnership with the University of Mississippi Medical Center, which ran from 2008 to 2011. Telepsychiatry sessions are not currently being used in the region, but before the project ended, it was responsible for > 1,000 videoconferencing clinical sessions.

The initial counseling sessions were “awkward” for some patients, the interviewees said, and some clients felt the consultation was “less personal.” Getting used to the technology may take some time. Once clients acclimated the feedback was positive.

The health care providers were concerned by not being able to observe in-person nonverbal clues, such as poor hygiene, that would normally help them evaluate the client’s health. The nurse at the CMHC helped fill a gap, the researchers say, created by technology.

The researchers determined that the benefit side was weighty: For instance, patients had better access to well-trained MH professionals and to the state hospital, and family could visit inpatients via videoconferencing. Staff had better access to professional development and training.

However, cost issues were a definite concern. The project would not have been feasible without grant funding, the researchers say. Medicaid reimburses for TMH services but not for technology setup costs and maintenance. Moreover, the interviews with administrators, the researchers say, indicated that TMH did not save the organization money. Costs for the equipment, installation, rent, and other supplies were prohibitive.

Although start-up costs are high, overall systematic costs go down, with savings on travel-related costs, including fewer missed appointments. Broadband technology, videoconferencing software, webcams, and education all take money. “If policymakers are serious” about TMH, the researchers conclude, they should allocate appropriate funding and resources.

Source:
Holland J, Hatcher W, Meares WL. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2018;41(1):52-86.

When telemental health care (TMH) works, it works well, the research agrees. For rural patients who often do not have easy access to health care TMH can be a lifesaver. The VA uses TMH to deliver care to veterans in rural VA medical centers, community-based outpatient clinics, and residential areas.  However, TMH is still relatively new in many rural communities, say researchers from University of Mississippi in Oxford and Augusta University in Georgia, and few studies have examined the delivery tool from an administrative standpoint. The literature suggests TMH will save money—the exploratory study, however, suggests otherwise.

The researchers interviewed 6 providers selected from the 15 community mental health (MH) centers (CMHCs) in rural Mississippi as well as an independent MH counselor who develops policy for the Mississippi Counselors Association. They asked respondents about the feasibility of TMH in the Mississippi Delta; in particular, the benefits, the costs, and the role of the state in facilitating the service. The researchers also collected data from a grant-funded pilot project conducted in the Mississippi Delta region by the Delta Health Alliance, a nonprofit organization in partnership with the University of Mississippi Medical Center, which ran from 2008 to 2011. Telepsychiatry sessions are not currently being used in the region, but before the project ended, it was responsible for > 1,000 videoconferencing clinical sessions.

The initial counseling sessions were “awkward” for some patients, the interviewees said, and some clients felt the consultation was “less personal.” Getting used to the technology may take some time. Once clients acclimated the feedback was positive.

The health care providers were concerned by not being able to observe in-person nonverbal clues, such as poor hygiene, that would normally help them evaluate the client’s health. The nurse at the CMHC helped fill a gap, the researchers say, created by technology.

The researchers determined that the benefit side was weighty: For instance, patients had better access to well-trained MH professionals and to the state hospital, and family could visit inpatients via videoconferencing. Staff had better access to professional development and training.

However, cost issues were a definite concern. The project would not have been feasible without grant funding, the researchers say. Medicaid reimburses for TMH services but not for technology setup costs and maintenance. Moreover, the interviews with administrators, the researchers say, indicated that TMH did not save the organization money. Costs for the equipment, installation, rent, and other supplies were prohibitive.

Although start-up costs are high, overall systematic costs go down, with savings on travel-related costs, including fewer missed appointments. Broadband technology, videoconferencing software, webcams, and education all take money. “If policymakers are serious” about TMH, the researchers conclude, they should allocate appropriate funding and resources.

Source:
Holland J, Hatcher W, Meares WL. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2018;41(1):52-86.

When telemental health care (TMH) works, it works well, the research agrees. For rural patients who often do not have easy access to health care TMH can be a lifesaver. The VA uses TMH to deliver care to veterans in rural VA medical centers, community-based outpatient clinics, and residential areas.  However, TMH is still relatively new in many rural communities, say researchers from University of Mississippi in Oxford and Augusta University in Georgia, and few studies have examined the delivery tool from an administrative standpoint. The literature suggests TMH will save money—the exploratory study, however, suggests otherwise.

The researchers interviewed 6 providers selected from the 15 community mental health (MH) centers (CMHCs) in rural Mississippi as well as an independent MH counselor who develops policy for the Mississippi Counselors Association. They asked respondents about the feasibility of TMH in the Mississippi Delta; in particular, the benefits, the costs, and the role of the state in facilitating the service. The researchers also collected data from a grant-funded pilot project conducted in the Mississippi Delta region by the Delta Health Alliance, a nonprofit organization in partnership with the University of Mississippi Medical Center, which ran from 2008 to 2011. Telepsychiatry sessions are not currently being used in the region, but before the project ended, it was responsible for > 1,000 videoconferencing clinical sessions.

The initial counseling sessions were “awkward” for some patients, the interviewees said, and some clients felt the consultation was “less personal.” Getting used to the technology may take some time. Once clients acclimated the feedback was positive.

The health care providers were concerned by not being able to observe in-person nonverbal clues, such as poor hygiene, that would normally help them evaluate the client’s health. The nurse at the CMHC helped fill a gap, the researchers say, created by technology.

The researchers determined that the benefit side was weighty: For instance, patients had better access to well-trained MH professionals and to the state hospital, and family could visit inpatients via videoconferencing. Staff had better access to professional development and training.

However, cost issues were a definite concern. The project would not have been feasible without grant funding, the researchers say. Medicaid reimburses for TMH services but not for technology setup costs and maintenance. Moreover, the interviews with administrators, the researchers say, indicated that TMH did not save the organization money. Costs for the equipment, installation, rent, and other supplies were prohibitive.

Although start-up costs are high, overall systematic costs go down, with savings on travel-related costs, including fewer missed appointments. Broadband technology, videoconferencing software, webcams, and education all take money. “If policymakers are serious” about TMH, the researchers conclude, they should allocate appropriate funding and resources.

Source:
Holland J, Hatcher W, Meares WL. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2018;41(1):52-86.