No one owns diabetes care
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 13:43
Display Headline
Primary care physicians equal to specialists for insulin management

SAN FRANCISCO – Adults with diabetes who started insulin achieved similar levels of glycemic control within 6 months whether they were managed by primary care physicians or specialists, according to a post hoc analysis of data on 17,374 patients.

Primary care physicians had more face-to-face visits and phone contacts with patients and took more time to train patients on insulin use, compared with specialists, which may be why patients seen by primary care physicians had more insulin dose adjustments and were less likely to develop hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Louise Faerch

The data were collected prior to starting insulin and at 12 and 24 weeks after insulin initiation in the 10-country observational SOLVE (Study of Once-Daily Levemir) study (Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2012;14:654-61), which primarily studied the timing of starting insulin.

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased by a mean of 1.3% in the 13,230 patients managed by specialists and by 1.2% in the 4,144 patients seen in primary care. Fasting blood glucose levels decreased by a mean of 3.1 mmol/L in the specialist group and by 2.9 mmol/L in the primary care group, reported Dr. Faerch of Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.

Patients seen by primary care providers were 25% less likely to have a hypoglycemic episode after starting insulin, compared with the specialist group, a difference that was significant, she said. The incidences of minor or severe hypoglycemia fell insignificantly in the primary care group, compared with before insulin initiation. In the specialist group, the incidence of minor hypoglycemia increased significantly and the incidence of severe hypoglycemia decreased significantly, compared with before insulin initiation.

The starting dose of insulin increased by 24 weeks in both groups but significantly more in the primary care group than in the specialist group, by a difference of 0.06 units/kg, after adjustment for the effects of confounding characteristics.

Patients in the primary care group lost a mean of 1.1 kg, compared with 0.4 kg in the specialist group, and had a 7% greater odds of losing at least 1 kg than did the specialist group, a significant difference.

Rates of office visits or phone contacts and the number of insulin dose changes were significantly higher in the primary care group at the 12- and 24-week follow-ups, she reported. The insulin dose was adjusted a mean of five times within 12 weeks and three times in the next 12 weeks in the primary care group, compared with three adjustments within 12 weeks and another two adjustments by 24 weeks in the specialist group.

Primary care physicians spent an average of approximately 18 minutes in training each patient on self-injection, 13 minutes on dose adjustments, and 22 minutes on other aspects of insulin treatment (such as diet and glucose monitoring), while specialists spent approximately 14 minutes on self-injection, 11 minutes on dose adjustment, and 16 minutes on other aspects of treatment.

Clinicians in the study were asked to follow the guidelines for diabetes treatment in their countries. Other than that, treatment choices were at the discretion of each physician, Dr. Faerch said.

Before starting insulin, patients in the primary care group were significantly older (64 years) than those in the specialist group (61 years); were heavier (88 kg vs. 79 kg, respectively); and were significantly more likely to have a history of macrovascular complications (30% vs. 26%), hypoglycemia (5.6% vs. 4.7%), and severe hypoglycemia (0.1 events vs. 0 events per person-year). Patients in the primary care group were more likely to be on just one oral antidiabetic drug (40%), compared with the specialist group (27%).

The study controlled for the effects of confounders including age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, history of hypoglycemia or macrovascular disease, number of oral antidiabetic drugs being taken at baseline, change in the number of oral antidiabetics used, time of insulin initiation, HbA1c levels at baseline, and insulin dose.

Dr. Faerch works for Novo Nordisk, which funded the study and markets diabetes medications.

sboschert@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @sherryboschert

Body

Dr. Sanjeev Mehta
Does it matter what type of provider you are when one is initiating or escalating insulin therapy? I think those are very appropriate and thought-provoking questions. Are we doing it the same way, at the same time, and considering the patients’ preferences in the same manner? The study suggests that we’re doing it roughly equally. That’s reassuring.

It’s probably an overstatement to say that in the current era, or any era where 80% of diabetes care is provided by primary care physicians, that care should be owned by one or the other type of physician, if not a midlevel provider. I think that having evidence-based protocols to guide therapy and incorporate patient preferences is really where we need to focus.

Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta of the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, made these comments in an interview at the meeting. He reported having no financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
diabetes, insulin, glycemic control, insulin use, hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Body

Dr. Sanjeev Mehta
Does it matter what type of provider you are when one is initiating or escalating insulin therapy? I think those are very appropriate and thought-provoking questions. Are we doing it the same way, at the same time, and considering the patients’ preferences in the same manner? The study suggests that we’re doing it roughly equally. That’s reassuring.

It’s probably an overstatement to say that in the current era, or any era where 80% of diabetes care is provided by primary care physicians, that care should be owned by one or the other type of physician, if not a midlevel provider. I think that having evidence-based protocols to guide therapy and incorporate patient preferences is really where we need to focus.

Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta of the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, made these comments in an interview at the meeting. He reported having no financial disclosures.

Body

Dr. Sanjeev Mehta
Does it matter what type of provider you are when one is initiating or escalating insulin therapy? I think those are very appropriate and thought-provoking questions. Are we doing it the same way, at the same time, and considering the patients’ preferences in the same manner? The study suggests that we’re doing it roughly equally. That’s reassuring.

It’s probably an overstatement to say that in the current era, or any era where 80% of diabetes care is provided by primary care physicians, that care should be owned by one or the other type of physician, if not a midlevel provider. I think that having evidence-based protocols to guide therapy and incorporate patient preferences is really where we need to focus.

Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta of the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, made these comments in an interview at the meeting. He reported having no financial disclosures.

Title
No one owns diabetes care
No one owns diabetes care

SAN FRANCISCO – Adults with diabetes who started insulin achieved similar levels of glycemic control within 6 months whether they were managed by primary care physicians or specialists, according to a post hoc analysis of data on 17,374 patients.

Primary care physicians had more face-to-face visits and phone contacts with patients and took more time to train patients on insulin use, compared with specialists, which may be why patients seen by primary care physicians had more insulin dose adjustments and were less likely to develop hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Louise Faerch

The data were collected prior to starting insulin and at 12 and 24 weeks after insulin initiation in the 10-country observational SOLVE (Study of Once-Daily Levemir) study (Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2012;14:654-61), which primarily studied the timing of starting insulin.

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased by a mean of 1.3% in the 13,230 patients managed by specialists and by 1.2% in the 4,144 patients seen in primary care. Fasting blood glucose levels decreased by a mean of 3.1 mmol/L in the specialist group and by 2.9 mmol/L in the primary care group, reported Dr. Faerch of Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.

Patients seen by primary care providers were 25% less likely to have a hypoglycemic episode after starting insulin, compared with the specialist group, a difference that was significant, she said. The incidences of minor or severe hypoglycemia fell insignificantly in the primary care group, compared with before insulin initiation. In the specialist group, the incidence of minor hypoglycemia increased significantly and the incidence of severe hypoglycemia decreased significantly, compared with before insulin initiation.

The starting dose of insulin increased by 24 weeks in both groups but significantly more in the primary care group than in the specialist group, by a difference of 0.06 units/kg, after adjustment for the effects of confounding characteristics.

Patients in the primary care group lost a mean of 1.1 kg, compared with 0.4 kg in the specialist group, and had a 7% greater odds of losing at least 1 kg than did the specialist group, a significant difference.

Rates of office visits or phone contacts and the number of insulin dose changes were significantly higher in the primary care group at the 12- and 24-week follow-ups, she reported. The insulin dose was adjusted a mean of five times within 12 weeks and three times in the next 12 weeks in the primary care group, compared with three adjustments within 12 weeks and another two adjustments by 24 weeks in the specialist group.

Primary care physicians spent an average of approximately 18 minutes in training each patient on self-injection, 13 minutes on dose adjustments, and 22 minutes on other aspects of insulin treatment (such as diet and glucose monitoring), while specialists spent approximately 14 minutes on self-injection, 11 minutes on dose adjustment, and 16 minutes on other aspects of treatment.

Clinicians in the study were asked to follow the guidelines for diabetes treatment in their countries. Other than that, treatment choices were at the discretion of each physician, Dr. Faerch said.

Before starting insulin, patients in the primary care group were significantly older (64 years) than those in the specialist group (61 years); were heavier (88 kg vs. 79 kg, respectively); and were significantly more likely to have a history of macrovascular complications (30% vs. 26%), hypoglycemia (5.6% vs. 4.7%), and severe hypoglycemia (0.1 events vs. 0 events per person-year). Patients in the primary care group were more likely to be on just one oral antidiabetic drug (40%), compared with the specialist group (27%).

The study controlled for the effects of confounders including age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, history of hypoglycemia or macrovascular disease, number of oral antidiabetic drugs being taken at baseline, change in the number of oral antidiabetics used, time of insulin initiation, HbA1c levels at baseline, and insulin dose.

Dr. Faerch works for Novo Nordisk, which funded the study and markets diabetes medications.

sboschert@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @sherryboschert

SAN FRANCISCO – Adults with diabetes who started insulin achieved similar levels of glycemic control within 6 months whether they were managed by primary care physicians or specialists, according to a post hoc analysis of data on 17,374 patients.

Primary care physicians had more face-to-face visits and phone contacts with patients and took more time to train patients on insulin use, compared with specialists, which may be why patients seen by primary care physicians had more insulin dose adjustments and were less likely to develop hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch reported at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

Dr. Louise Faerch

The data were collected prior to starting insulin and at 12 and 24 weeks after insulin initiation in the 10-country observational SOLVE (Study of Once-Daily Levemir) study (Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2012;14:654-61), which primarily studied the timing of starting insulin.

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased by a mean of 1.3% in the 13,230 patients managed by specialists and by 1.2% in the 4,144 patients seen in primary care. Fasting blood glucose levels decreased by a mean of 3.1 mmol/L in the specialist group and by 2.9 mmol/L in the primary care group, reported Dr. Faerch of Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.

Patients seen by primary care providers were 25% less likely to have a hypoglycemic episode after starting insulin, compared with the specialist group, a difference that was significant, she said. The incidences of minor or severe hypoglycemia fell insignificantly in the primary care group, compared with before insulin initiation. In the specialist group, the incidence of minor hypoglycemia increased significantly and the incidence of severe hypoglycemia decreased significantly, compared with before insulin initiation.

The starting dose of insulin increased by 24 weeks in both groups but significantly more in the primary care group than in the specialist group, by a difference of 0.06 units/kg, after adjustment for the effects of confounding characteristics.

Patients in the primary care group lost a mean of 1.1 kg, compared with 0.4 kg in the specialist group, and had a 7% greater odds of losing at least 1 kg than did the specialist group, a significant difference.

Rates of office visits or phone contacts and the number of insulin dose changes were significantly higher in the primary care group at the 12- and 24-week follow-ups, she reported. The insulin dose was adjusted a mean of five times within 12 weeks and three times in the next 12 weeks in the primary care group, compared with three adjustments within 12 weeks and another two adjustments by 24 weeks in the specialist group.

Primary care physicians spent an average of approximately 18 minutes in training each patient on self-injection, 13 minutes on dose adjustments, and 22 minutes on other aspects of insulin treatment (such as diet and glucose monitoring), while specialists spent approximately 14 minutes on self-injection, 11 minutes on dose adjustment, and 16 minutes on other aspects of treatment.

Clinicians in the study were asked to follow the guidelines for diabetes treatment in their countries. Other than that, treatment choices were at the discretion of each physician, Dr. Faerch said.

Before starting insulin, patients in the primary care group were significantly older (64 years) than those in the specialist group (61 years); were heavier (88 kg vs. 79 kg, respectively); and were significantly more likely to have a history of macrovascular complications (30% vs. 26%), hypoglycemia (5.6% vs. 4.7%), and severe hypoglycemia (0.1 events vs. 0 events per person-year). Patients in the primary care group were more likely to be on just one oral antidiabetic drug (40%), compared with the specialist group (27%).

The study controlled for the effects of confounders including age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, history of hypoglycemia or macrovascular disease, number of oral antidiabetic drugs being taken at baseline, change in the number of oral antidiabetics used, time of insulin initiation, HbA1c levels at baseline, and insulin dose.

Dr. Faerch works for Novo Nordisk, which funded the study and markets diabetes medications.

sboschert@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @sherryboschert

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Primary care physicians equal to specialists for insulin management
Display Headline
Primary care physicians equal to specialists for insulin management
Legacy Keywords
diabetes, insulin, glycemic control, insulin use, hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch,
Legacy Keywords
diabetes, insulin, glycemic control, insulin use, hypoglycemia, Dr. Louise Faerch,
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ADA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Changes in HbA1c after starting insulin are similar whether the patient sees a primary care physician or a specialist.

Major finding: HbA1c levels decreased by 1.2% at 24 weeks in patients managed by a primary care physician and 1.3% in those managed by a specialist.

Data source: A post hoc analysis of data from an observational study of 17,374 patients with diabetes starting insulin in 10 countries.

Disclosures: Dr. Faerch works for Novo Nordisk, which funded the study and markets diabetes medications.