Platelet-rich plasma reduces sternal wound infection risk

ORLANDO – The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma following cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of sternal wound complications – and with a 50% reduction in the costs associated with such complications – in a study of 2,000 patients.

The findings suggest that routine use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) should be considered for all patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgical procedures, Dr. Amit N. Patel said at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Over a 7-year period, an initial 1,000 patients undergoing open cardiac operations requiring sternotomy received standard-of-care sternal closure, including preoperative antibiotic treatment and protocol-driven glycemic management. The second 1,000 patients received the same standard-of-care sternal closure plus PRP, which was applied to the sternum at the time of closure.

Compared with the control group, the patients who received PRP had a significantly reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infections (0.6% vs. 2.0%) and superficial wound drainage (2.0% vs. 8.0%), as well as a lower readmission rate (0.8% vs. 4.0%), said Dr. Patel of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

On multivariate analysis, the use of PRP was an independent predictor of a reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infection, he reported.

Furthermore, the total cost associated with caring for wound complications was reduced by about 50% in the PRP group ($593,791 vs. $1,256,960), he added.

The treatment and control groups were similar with respect to age, weight, diabetes, renal dysfunction, smoking status, and steroid use. However, the treatment group had more ventricular assist device implantations and open aortic operations. No complications associated with the use of PRP were reported.

Given the increased morbidity, mortality and costs associated with sternal wound complications following cardiac surgery, the findings have important implications for improving outcomes, Dr. Patel said, noting that the findings support those of several prior studies demonstrating that autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes successful wound healing through improved ossification.

"The problem is, how do you prepare it, how do you apply it, and how do you use it reproducibly?" he said.

In the current study, the Magellan Platelet Separator System was used, and it provided such reproducibility – at a cost of $385 per application, he noted.

Though limited by the single-center, nonrandomized, and nonblinded nature of the study, the findings are bolstered by the large sample size and the fact that the study was conducted at a tertiary referral center, he said.

"The overall potential of PRP in this large sample size was very positive," he concluded.

Dr. Patel reported having no disclosures.

ORLANDO – The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma following cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of sternal wound complications – and with a 50% reduction in the costs associated with such complications – in a study of 2,000 patients.

The findings suggest that routine use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) should be considered for all patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgical procedures, Dr. Amit N. Patel said at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Over a 7-year period, an initial 1,000 patients undergoing open cardiac operations requiring sternotomy received standard-of-care sternal closure, including preoperative antibiotic treatment and protocol-driven glycemic management. The second 1,000 patients received the same standard-of-care sternal closure plus PRP, which was applied to the sternum at the time of closure.

Compared with the control group, the patients who received PRP had a significantly reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infections (0.6% vs. 2.0%) and superficial wound drainage (2.0% vs. 8.0%), as well as a lower readmission rate (0.8% vs. 4.0%), said Dr. Patel of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

On multivariate analysis, the use of PRP was an independent predictor of a reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infection, he reported.

Furthermore, the total cost associated with caring for wound complications was reduced by about 50% in the PRP group ($593,791 vs. $1,256,960), he added.

The treatment and control groups were similar with respect to age, weight, diabetes, renal dysfunction, smoking status, and steroid use. However, the treatment group had more ventricular assist device implantations and open aortic operations. No complications associated with the use of PRP were reported.

Given the increased morbidity, mortality and costs associated with sternal wound complications following cardiac surgery, the findings have important implications for improving outcomes, Dr. Patel said, noting that the findings support those of several prior studies demonstrating that autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes successful wound healing through improved ossification.

"The problem is, how do you prepare it, how do you apply it, and how do you use it reproducibly?" he said.

In the current study, the Magellan Platelet Separator System was used, and it provided such reproducibility – at a cost of $385 per application, he noted.

Though limited by the single-center, nonrandomized, and nonblinded nature of the study, the findings are bolstered by the large sample size and the fact that the study was conducted at a tertiary referral center, he said.

"The overall potential of PRP in this large sample size was very positive," he concluded.

Dr. Patel reported having no disclosures.

ORLANDO – The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma following cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of sternal wound complications – and with a 50% reduction in the costs associated with such complications – in a study of 2,000 patients.

The findings suggest that routine use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) should be considered for all patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgical procedures, Dr. Amit N. Patel said at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Over a 7-year period, an initial 1,000 patients undergoing open cardiac operations requiring sternotomy received standard-of-care sternal closure, including preoperative antibiotic treatment and protocol-driven glycemic management. The second 1,000 patients received the same standard-of-care sternal closure plus PRP, which was applied to the sternum at the time of closure.

Compared with the control group, the patients who received PRP had a significantly reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infections (0.6% vs. 2.0%) and superficial wound drainage (2.0% vs. 8.0%), as well as a lower readmission rate (0.8% vs. 4.0%), said Dr. Patel of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

On multivariate analysis, the use of PRP was an independent predictor of a reduced incidence of deep sternal wound infection, he reported.

Furthermore, the total cost associated with caring for wound complications was reduced by about 50% in the PRP group ($593,791 vs. $1,256,960), he added.

The treatment and control groups were similar with respect to age, weight, diabetes, renal dysfunction, smoking status, and steroid use. However, the treatment group had more ventricular assist device implantations and open aortic operations. No complications associated with the use of PRP were reported.

Given the increased morbidity, mortality and costs associated with sternal wound complications following cardiac surgery, the findings have important implications for improving outcomes, Dr. Patel said, noting that the findings support those of several prior studies demonstrating that autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes successful wound healing through improved ossification.

"The problem is, how do you prepare it, how do you apply it, and how do you use it reproducibly?" he said.

In the current study, the Magellan Platelet Separator System was used, and it provided such reproducibility – at a cost of $385 per application, he noted.

Though limited by the single-center, nonrandomized, and nonblinded nature of the study, the findings are bolstered by the large sample size and the fact that the study was conducted at a tertiary referral center, he said.

"The overall potential of PRP in this large sample size was very positive," he concluded.

Dr. Patel reported having no disclosures.