Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads