Does arrhythmia predict Fontan failure?
Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:44

 

People who have undergone the Fontan procedure have been known to be prone to developing arrhythmias, but few studies have evaluated their prognosis, so researchers from Australia and New Zealand analyzed results of more than 1,000 patients with Fontan circulation and found that two-thirds did not have any arrhythmia at 20 years, and that, among those who did have arrhythmias, almost three-quarters survived 10 years.

Body

 

When interpreting the data that the Australian and New Zealand researchers analyzed, one must be cautious about viewing arrhythmia as an early indicator for Fontan revision, Mark E. Alexander, MD, of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1364-5).

The outcome of a Fontan revision after an arrhythmia “becomes self-fulfilling,” Dr. Alexander said. He questioned what the revision procedure would be when the initial operation was an extracardiac Fontan. “The complex risks of that procedure continue to keep decisions regarding Fontan revisions challenging,” he said. He also noted the study did not analyze the association of ventricular function and arrhythmias “in a substantive way.”

And Dr. Alexander did not interpret the study results as an endorsement of the extracardiac Fontan or a rejection of the lateral tunnel approach. The early adoption of the extracardiac Fontan by the groups the authors represented is itself a limitation of the study, he said. Challenges with follow-up of extracardiac techniques in this and other studies “limit our ability to declare a ‘victor’ in that debate,” he said. “It does remind the electrophysiologist that he or she needs to master the techniques of entering the pulmonary venous atrium in these patients.”

The precision of calculating risk after an operation grows weaker with time, he said, and at 15-20 years morbidity starts to increase and follow-up becomes “more diffuse,” Dr. Alexander said. “That reality means we look forward to this group continuing to enhance our understanding of how our changing management decisions can aid our patients.”

Dr. Alexander had no financial relationships to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

When interpreting the data that the Australian and New Zealand researchers analyzed, one must be cautious about viewing arrhythmia as an early indicator for Fontan revision, Mark E. Alexander, MD, of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1364-5).

The outcome of a Fontan revision after an arrhythmia “becomes self-fulfilling,” Dr. Alexander said. He questioned what the revision procedure would be when the initial operation was an extracardiac Fontan. “The complex risks of that procedure continue to keep decisions regarding Fontan revisions challenging,” he said. He also noted the study did not analyze the association of ventricular function and arrhythmias “in a substantive way.”

And Dr. Alexander did not interpret the study results as an endorsement of the extracardiac Fontan or a rejection of the lateral tunnel approach. The early adoption of the extracardiac Fontan by the groups the authors represented is itself a limitation of the study, he said. Challenges with follow-up of extracardiac techniques in this and other studies “limit our ability to declare a ‘victor’ in that debate,” he said. “It does remind the electrophysiologist that he or she needs to master the techniques of entering the pulmonary venous atrium in these patients.”

The precision of calculating risk after an operation grows weaker with time, he said, and at 15-20 years morbidity starts to increase and follow-up becomes “more diffuse,” Dr. Alexander said. “That reality means we look forward to this group continuing to enhance our understanding of how our changing management decisions can aid our patients.”

Dr. Alexander had no financial relationships to disclose.

Body

 

When interpreting the data that the Australian and New Zealand researchers analyzed, one must be cautious about viewing arrhythmia as an early indicator for Fontan revision, Mark E. Alexander, MD, of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1364-5).

The outcome of a Fontan revision after an arrhythmia “becomes self-fulfilling,” Dr. Alexander said. He questioned what the revision procedure would be when the initial operation was an extracardiac Fontan. “The complex risks of that procedure continue to keep decisions regarding Fontan revisions challenging,” he said. He also noted the study did not analyze the association of ventricular function and arrhythmias “in a substantive way.”

And Dr. Alexander did not interpret the study results as an endorsement of the extracardiac Fontan or a rejection of the lateral tunnel approach. The early adoption of the extracardiac Fontan by the groups the authors represented is itself a limitation of the study, he said. Challenges with follow-up of extracardiac techniques in this and other studies “limit our ability to declare a ‘victor’ in that debate,” he said. “It does remind the electrophysiologist that he or she needs to master the techniques of entering the pulmonary venous atrium in these patients.”

The precision of calculating risk after an operation grows weaker with time, he said, and at 15-20 years morbidity starts to increase and follow-up becomes “more diffuse,” Dr. Alexander said. “That reality means we look forward to this group continuing to enhance our understanding of how our changing management decisions can aid our patients.”

Dr. Alexander had no financial relationships to disclose.

Title
Does arrhythmia predict Fontan failure?
Does arrhythmia predict Fontan failure?

 

People who have undergone the Fontan procedure have been known to be prone to developing arrhythmias, but few studies have evaluated their prognosis, so researchers from Australia and New Zealand analyzed results of more than 1,000 patients with Fontan circulation and found that two-thirds did not have any arrhythmia at 20 years, and that, among those who did have arrhythmias, almost three-quarters survived 10 years.

 

People who have undergone the Fontan procedure have been known to be prone to developing arrhythmias, but few studies have evaluated their prognosis, so researchers from Australia and New Zealand analyzed results of more than 1,000 patients with Fontan circulation and found that two-thirds did not have any arrhythmia at 20 years, and that, among those who did have arrhythmias, almost three-quarters survived 10 years.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The development of arrhythmia is associated with a heightened risk of failure of Fontan circulation after a Fontan procedure.

Major finding: At 20 years, freedom from any arrhythmia was 66%, and after the onset of any arrhythmia freedom from Fontan failure was 55%.

Data source: 1,034 patients who had undergone a Fontan procedure from 1975 to 2014 as recorded in the Australian and New Zealand Fontan Registry.

Disclosures: Coauthor Andrew Bullock, MBBS, reported receiving consulting fees from Actelion. All other others have no financial relationships to disclose.